January 6 - How much do you care?

[kalm]

What did she lie about?

Well we’ll never know, i guess, because they wouldn’t call the 17 people who would have contradicted her story and destroyed the committee’s narrative.

17? Link to a list?

Why do you think they weren’t called to testify?

[AZGrizFan]

Well we’ll never know, i guess, because they wouldn’t call the 17 people who would have contradicted her story and destroyed the committee’s narrative.

17? Link to a list?

Why do you think they weren’t called to testify?

I already said why. It would contradict her story and destroy their boogeyman narrative.

[kalm]

17? Link to a list?

Why do you think they weren’t called to testify?

I already said why. It would contradict her story and destroy their boogeyman narrative.

Yes…prolly thought nobody would notice and they’d get away with it too!

[Baldy]

Is lying to Congress under oath really the right choice?

What did she lie about?

About what she didn't see.

[kalm]

What did she lie about?

About what she didn't see.

You mean the car incident?

[kalm]

USSS likely won’t be the only agency under DOJ scrutiny over scrubbed phones.

[AZGrizFan]

I already said why. It would contradict her story and destroy their boogeyman narrative.

Yes…prolly thought nobody would notice and they’d get away with it too!

Well to their core audience, they DID.

[HI54UNI]

USSS likely won’t be the only agency under DOJ scrutiny over scrubbed phones.

Like the scrubbed Mueller phones you were so concerned about as well, nothing will happen.

[houndawg]

What did she lie about?

About what she didn't see.

Good point - didn't the SS say that their guys were ready to contradict her story under oath? What's the latest on that, Baldy?

[kalm]

USSS likely won’t be the only agency under DOJ scrutiny over scrubbed phones.

Like the scrubbed Mueller phones you were so concerned about as well, nothing will happen.

Sure.

[kalm]

About what she didn't see.

Good point - didn't the SS say that their guys were ready to contradict her story under oath? What's the latest on that, Baldy?

It’s almost a certainty they’re under a DOJ investigation and at least one of them has already testified. That’s the missing part for many. The J6 committee is only a fact finding mission. It doesn’t end there.

Besides…this is just one small, rather insignificant part of a larger investigation. But hey…if that’s all you have to hang your hat on, throw it on that peg again and again I guess.

[kalm]

Timeline of National Guard deployment requests.

[UNI88]

Good point - didn't the SS say that their guys were ready to contradict her story under oath? What's the latest on that, Baldy?

It’s almost a certainty they’re under a DOJ investigation and at least one of them has already testified. That’s the missing part for many. The J6 committee is only a fact finding mission. It doesn’t end there.

Besides…this is just one small, rather insignificant part of a larger investigation. But hey…if that’s all you have to hang your hat on, throw it on that peg again and again I guess.

Only? You forgot it's also a propaganda circus. And I'm sure it's a few other things as well.

And I support the J6 Committee. The investigation is needed but the motives of the committee as structured and functioning are far from pure or focused on fact-finding. Conks are just as much to blame for that reality as Donks but it is reality.

[kalm]

It’s almost a certainty they’re under a DOJ investigation and at least one of them has already testified. That’s the missing part for many. The J6 committee is only a fact finding mission. It doesn’t end there.

Besides…this is just one small, rather insignificant part of a larger investigation. But hey…if that’s all you have to hang your hat on, throw it on that peg again and again I guess.

Only? You forgot it's also a propaganda circus. And I'm sure it's a few other things as well.

And I support the J6 Committee. The investigation is needed but the motives of the committee as structured and functioning are far from pure or focused on fact-finding. Conks are just as much to blame for that reality as Donks but it is reality.

What are they propagandizing?

[UNI88]

Only? You forgot it's also a propaganda circus. And I'm sure it's a few other things as well.

And I support the J6 Committee. The investigation is needed but the motives of the committee as structured and functioning are far from pure or focused on fact-finding. Conks are just as much to blame for that reality as Donks but it is reality.

What are they propagandizing?

If you don't know then you've had too much illiberal kool-aid.

[kalm]

What are they propagandizing?

If you don't know then you've had too much illiberal kool-aid.

I approached it with a healthy degree of skepticism like most things. I saw the political theatrics from the start. Dems benefit from the outcomes and facts that are discovered.

I’ll ask again, what is the committee propagandizing? How should it had differed?

[UNI88]

If you don't know then you've had too much illiberal kool-aid.

I approached it with a healthy degree of skepticism like most things. I saw the political theatrics from the start. Dems benefit from the outcomes and facts that are discovered.

I’ll ask again, what is the committee propagandizing? How should it had differed?

Having hearsay testimony that supports the point you're trying to make while not having eye witness testimony that might refute the hearsay.

The point of these hearings isn't justice or the truth it's to make Trump look bad, rile up the base, and sway moderate/independent voters. It could have been serious and professional but they've turned it into a circus. It's another example of why I have almost ZERO faith in our elected officials' ability to do anything well.

[AZGrizFan]

If you don't know then you've had too much illiberal kool-aid.

I approached it with a healthy degree of skepticism like most things. I saw the political theatrics from the start. Dems benefit from the outcomes and facts that are discovered.

I’ll ask again, what is the committee propagandizing? How should it had differed?

Oh come on. You can NOT be this stupid.

[houndawg]

It’s almost a certainty they’re under a DOJ investigation and at least one of them has already testified. That’s the missing part for many. The J6 committee is only a fact finding mission. It doesn’t end there.

Besides…this is just one small, rather insignificant part of a larger investigation. But hey…if that’s all you have to hang your hat on, throw it on that peg again and again I guess.

Only? You forgot it's also a propaganda circus. And I'm sure it's a few other things as well.

And I support the J6 Committee. The investigation is needed but the motives of the committee as structured and functioning are far from pure or focused on fact-finding. Conks are just as much to blame for that reality as Donks but it is reality.

Stop the presses! We got us another Benghazi!!


(ain't payback a bitch?)

[houndawg]

What are they propagandizing?

If you don't know then you've had too much illiberal kool-aid.

You don't know either?

Its Benghazi all over again...waiting for help while the terrorists looted US property

[houndawg]

I approached it with a healthy degree of skepticism like most things. I saw the political theatrics from the start. Dems benefit from the outcomes and facts that are discovered.

I’ll ask again, what is the committee propagandizing? How should it had differed?

Oh come on. You can NOT be this stupid.

Try harder Z - it can be explained with small words if you think it through...

[houndawg]

I approached it with a healthy degree of skepticism like most things. I saw the political theatrics from the start. Dems benefit from the outcomes and facts that are discovered.

I’ll ask again, what is the committee propagandizing? How should it had differed?

Having hearsay testimony that supports the point you're trying to make while not having eye witness testimony that might refute the hearsay.

The point of these hearings isn't justice or the truth it's to make Trump look bad, rile up the base, and sway moderate/independent voters. It could have been serious and professional but they've turned it into a circus. It's another example of why I have almost ZERO faith in our elected officials' ability to do anything well.

Yes, thats why I asked for an update on the SS guys that were ready to refute that hearsay under oath.

Then klam comes along and tells us they've all lawyered up.

your turn...

[kalm]

Having hearsay testimony that supports the point you're trying to make while not having eye witness testimony that might refute the hearsay.

The point of these hearings isn't justice or the truth it's to make Trump look bad, rile up the base, and sway moderate/independent voters. It could have been serious and professional but they've turned it into a circus. It's another example of why I have almost ZERO faith in our elected officials' ability to do anything well.

Yes, thats why I asked for an update on the SS guys that were ready to refute that hearsay under oath.

Then klam comes along and tells us they've all lawyered up.

your turn...

And again…it’s a tiny part of a bigger story. USSS and DoD cover up, the Alex Jones texts have already been subpoenaed…etc. BTW, Jones claimed the 5th 100 tines in his testimony to the J6 committee.

Hell of a circus.

[Baldy]

Good point - didn't the SS say that their guys were ready to contradict her story under oath? What's the latest on that, Baldy?

It’s almost a certainty they’re under a DOJ investigation and at least one of them has already testified. That’s the missing part for many. The J6 committee is only a fact finding mission. It doesn’t end there.

Besides…this is just one small, rather insignificant part of a larger investigation. But hey…if that’s all you have to hang your hat on, throw it on that peg again and again I guess.

This is a highly scripted dramatized prime time show trial complete with Hollywood producers. It's just one big long drawn out campaign ad for the Donks right before the midterm elections. Paid for with your tax dollars. Do you not realize this?

[UNI88]

Yes, thats why I asked for an update on the SS guys that were ready to refute that hearsay under oath.

Then klam comes along and tells us they've all lawyered up.

your turn...

And again…it’s a tiny part of a bigger story. USSS and DoD cover up, the Alex Jones texts have already been subpoenaed…etc. BTW, Jones claimed the 5th 100 tines in his testimony to the J6 committee.

Hell of a circus.

Like a broke clock Houndie is right - it is similar to Benghazi, the email server, etc. A lot of subterfuge and cover-ups.

You want to make a big deal about what the USSS and DoD have done but didn't have nearly as big of a problem with what DoJ did during the trump investigations.

The J6 committee and hearings are a circus on both sides of the aisle and in places that should be above reproach.