kalm wrote:SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 11:10 am
I'm shocked the global warming crowd can't come up with a better story than "they actually get money for research".
This reeks of the Newsweek article years ago in which they made a big deal out of $50 million going to prove global warming was a farce, only to NOT mention that $ 2 Billion was spent in the same time period to try and prove global warming.
If the science stands, it doesn't matter who is backing it, but as has happened in many instances, the global warming crowd does not like to show their work... like documented liar Michael Mann.
We’ve been through this before...
Name one scientific org that doesn’t recognize gw.
Find one well credentialed gw denier scientist who is not easily connected to fossil fuels.
Mann was vindicated (but, but, but hockey sticks!)
I love how you tout science and say Mann was vindicated in the same breath.
The argument over AGW isn’t in the whether- it is in the “what”. Claiming that there is some legion of people in the scientific community out there denying AGW on its face is a straw man and you know it.
AGW is real, and we have no clue how it will manifest itself. <<<that right there is science. Pure as the wind driven snow. Anything else is suppositional bullshit and Mann is a fraud.
Im not sure why you rise to the defense of the people you do. Maybe you’re just a closet populist and you think nobody is on to you
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk