UNI88 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 10:54 pm
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:44 pm
Well, the Somalian encouraged confrontation against the Jews. .
Omar and the Squat's antisemitism is another thing.
Anyone who called the protests "mostly peaceful" while cities were burning was rationalizing and defending the actions of the less peaceful protesters. Focusing on whether AOChe's words encouraged specific actions of the protesters is deflecting from the truth that supporting the protests without condemning the rioting and looting was de facto support for the rioters. I'm sorry if that reality makes Kalm "uncomfortable".
Hey, man. Reading a fellow Republican’s satire on MGT and immediately pivoting to AOC is your discomfort game. I was merely trying to kindly help you out.
I read a little on AOC’s thoughts on the riots. They reminded me of my own regarding defunding the police. My first thought was ‘man is that some poor branding.’ Next thought was ‘but I suppose asking for “police reform” was already tried, and hadn’t really solved much. It’s not all that surprising that the ante was raised.’
To carry your logic further, condemning AOC for not denouncing violence enough (btw, she did not condone the violence) without recognizing the causes of the civil unrest must represent de facto support for police violence.
Ghandi wanted to make the British “uncomfortable.” Ghandi must have been a violence supporting terrorist?