FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=52090
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Sun Dec 27, 2020 9:37 am Can’t be many candidates.
Donks:
-AOC - although she a coont.
-Tulsi Gabbard.
Conks:
-Freshman conk Rep Lauren Boebert, 34, who owns Shooters Grill in Rifle, CO. She unseated a 5 term conk incumbent in the conk primary before winning election last month, and has pledged to join the Freedom Caucus.
What could go wrong? 
And where did she go to school?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com ... rests/amp/Boebert’s future husband Jayson also had brushes with law enforcement. In January 2004 he was arrested after allegedly exposing his penis to two women at a bowling alley, according to an arrest affidavit. Lauren Boebert (then aged 17 and known as Lauren Opal Roberts) was also there. Jayson Boebert pled guilty to public indecency and lewd exposure, earning himself four days in jail and two years probation.
In February 2004, he was booked on a domestic violence charge, against Lauren Boebert. He “did unlawfully strike, shove or kick … and subjected her to physical contact,” a spokesman for the Garfield Associate County Court clerk told The Post. They had been dating at the time.
Jayson Boebert ultimately served seven days in jail. The busts were first unearthed by Colorado blogger Anne Landman.
Lauren Boebert took her revenge in May 2004 during an altercation with Jayson at his home in which she scratched his face and chest and trashed his residence, according to a police report. She was slapped with third-degree assault, criminal mischief and underage drinking charges. A rep for the Garfield County Combined Court said they could not reveal any information about the case’s final disposition.
The Boeberts married in 2005, and have four children.
She is full on Q-Anon psycho crazy traitorous seditionish criminalUNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 1:25 pmkalm wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 12:55 pm
Can’t believe this happening...
“Rep. Lauren Boebert says Twitter account locked until Inauguration Day
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (KRDO) -- Rep. Lauren Boebert's says Twitter has locked her account for nearly a week until the end of Inauguration Day.”
https://krdo.com/news/2021/01/13/lauren ... igshmwz9IwIs she wrong?But she fired back on Monday saying Democrats and "Hollywood elites" are hypocrites and are also to blame for escalating political division.
That might be true but I was asking if she was wrong in stating that "unelected tech oligarchs should not have such massive power over global discourse."
UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:24 amThat might be true but I was asking if she was wrong in stating that "unelected tech oligarchs should not have such massive power over global discourse."
AOChe, Omar and the like are traitorous, seditionist criminals but they're taking the Manchurian approaching to destroying this country.
You won’t like the remedy...anti-trust enforcement that regulates the free market. Your additional allies in this will be Bernie and AOC and it also requires big government.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:24 amThat might be true but I was asking if she was wrong in stating that "unelected tech oligarchs should not have such massive power over global discourse."
AOChe, Omar and the like are traitorous, seditionist criminals but they're taking the Manchurian approaching to destroying this country.
why, pray tell, is THAT the remedy?kalm wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 1:18 pmYou won’t like the remedy...anti-trust enforcement that regulates the free market. Your additional allies in this will be Bernie and AOC and it also requires big government.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:24 am
That might be true but I was asking if she was wrong in stating that "unelected tech oligarchs should not have such massive power over global discourse."
AOChe, Omar and the like are traitorous, seditionist criminals but they're taking the Manchurian approaching to destroying this country.
Why do you hate capitalism?
I don't dislike anti-trust enforcement. The problem is in defining collusion or monopoly and understanding how quickly the tech world changes. Mega search and social media companies have so much influence/control over what and how information is presented to the public. The best approach to maintaining free speech and accurate information might not be to just break up the mega-companies. We need to step back and consider the big picture, not our own selfish objectives (like Bernie and AOC tend to do).kalm wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 1:18 pmYou won’t like the remedy...anti-trust enforcement that regulates the free market. Your additional allies in this will be Bernie and AOC and it also requires big government.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:24 am
That might be true but I was asking if she was wrong in stating that "unelected tech oligarchs should not have such massive power over global discourse."
AOChe, Omar and the like are traitorous, seditionist criminals but they're taking the Manchurian approaching to destroying this country.
Why do you hate capitalism?
So anti trust enforcement is a part of true capitalism? Tell me more.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 1:26 pmI don't dislike anti-trust enforcement. The problem is in defining collusion or monopoly and understanding how quickly the tech world changes. Mega search and social media companies have so much influence/control over what and how information is presented to the public. The best approach to maintaining free speech and accurate information might not be to just break up the mega-companies. We need to step back and consider the big picture, not our own selfish objectives (like Bernie and AOC tend to do).
How long has it been since Microsoft was considered the evil empire that needed to be reigned in. Now it's Google, Facebook, etc. How long will it be before they're replaced by new technology or platforms. How do we develop a framework that isn't just a reactionary response to today's issues but also consider's tomorrow's potential issues?
If you haven't noticed, I'm a big fan of true capitalism.
Well, monopoly and collusion (and cronyism) are the enemies of true capitalism but you already know that so I'd be preaching to the choir.kalm wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 1:35 pmSo anti trust enforcement is a part of true capitalism? Tell me more.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 1:26 pm
I don't dislike anti-trust enforcement. The problem is in defining collusion or monopoly and understanding how quickly the tech world changes. Mega search and social media companies have so much influence/control over what and how information is presented to the public. The best approach to maintaining free speech and accurate information might not be to just break up the mega-companies. We need to step back and consider the big picture, not our own selfish objectives (like Bernie and AOC tend to do).
How long has it been since Microsoft was considered the evil empire that needed to be reigned in. Now it's Google, Facebook, etc. How long will it be before they're replaced by new technology or platforms. How do we develop a framework that isn't just a reactionary response to today's issues but also consider's tomorrow's potential issues?
If you haven't noticed, I'm a big fan of true capitalism.
Monopoly can also be the result of true capitalism. Isn’t true capitalism allowing the market to pick winners and losers? To the winners go the spoils. If something becomes too big, the market will fix it?
If "big government is the solution", I'll stick with whatever the "problem" is.kalm wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 1:35 pmSo anti trust enforcement is a part of true capitalism? Tell me more.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 1:26 pm
I don't dislike anti-trust enforcement. The problem is in defining collusion or monopoly and understanding how quickly the tech world changes. Mega search and social media companies have so much influence/control over what and how information is presented to the public. The best approach to maintaining free speech and accurate information might not be to just break up the mega-companies. We need to step back and consider the big picture, not our own selfish objectives (like Bernie and AOC tend to do).
How long has it been since Microsoft was considered the evil empire that needed to be reigned in. Now it's Google, Facebook, etc. How long will it be before they're replaced by new technology or platforms. How do we develop a framework that isn't just a reactionary response to today's issues but also consider's tomorrow's potential issues?
If you haven't noticed, I'm a big fan of true capitalism.
I dunno. Mace just looks better than Boebert. Yes, she's older. But she's older and she looks better. Boebert's face borders on downright ugly. I actually saw Mace interviewed on TV today and I don't think that picture does her justice. She's a pretty woman. Boebert is not.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:42 pmFor Congress and being 43, according to her wiki page, not bad. Nice rack. AOC is 31, and Boebert is 34, so they've got that youth advantage.
Now that Gabbard is out of Congress, Mace would appear to be a candidate for 3rd place. Certainly top 5. Who else is there?
Speaking of - I just heard that she was in a bad car accident last week.JoltinJoe wrote: ↑Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:05 pmBDKJMU wrote: ↑Sun Dec 27, 2020 9:37 am Can’t be many candidates.
Donks:
-AOC - although she a coont.
-Tulsi Gabbard.
Conks:
-Freshman conk Rep Lauren Boebert, 34, who owns Shooters Grill in Rifle, CO. She unseated a 5 term conk incumbent in the conk primary before winning election last month, and has pledged to join the Freedom Caucus.
So she packs heat and her name sounds like Lorena Bobbitt.
