FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=51832
Exactly. And BLM IGNORES the elephant in the room - black on black crime. And instead chooses to focus on the .1% of black deaths caused by racist cops by claiming that the “entire system is racist”. Is there any other explanation as to why they would do that other than the fact that death by cop can exploited for political gain?
I don't see black on black, yellow on black, red on black in what they are about, on their web page. I do see they are against white supremacist, vigilante and wrongful govt attacks on minorities.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 20, 2020 10:53 amExactly. And BLM IGNORES the elephant in the room - black on black crime. And instead chooses to focus on the .1% of black deaths caused by racist cops by claiming that the “entire system is racist”. Is there any other explanation as to why they would do that other than the fact that death by cop can exploited for political gain?
I guess the real question is this: Why isn’t Chicago rioting over the black-on-black crime that happens there every weekend that dwarfs what happens between blacks and police in a year?Gil Dobie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 20, 2020 11:21 amI don't see black on black, yellow on black, red on black in what they are about, on their web page. I do see they are against white supremacist, vigilante and wrongful govt attacks on minorities.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 20, 2020 10:53 am
Exactly. And BLM IGNORES the elephant in the room - black on black crime. And instead chooses to focus on the .1% of black deaths caused by racist cops by claiming that the “entire system is racist”. Is there any other explanation as to why they would do that other than the fact that death by cop can exploited for political gain?
Doesn't sound like protesting regular crime is their purpose.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 20, 2020 11:47 amI guess the real question is this: Why isn’t Chicago rioting over the black-on-black crime that happens there every weekend that dwarfs what happens between blacks and police in a year?
Why do they only riot when one is killed by a policeman? Why are the not equally (or 99.4x more) outraged that the black-on-black crime in their city continues unabated with zero concern expressed?
No. And inquiring minds want to know WHY. If 99.4% of black crime/deaths mean nothing to BLM, then they are the most ironically named organization since the CFPB. So back to the OP, their name shouldn’t be BLM, but instead BLMBOITAOOTFAAKBRC.....fuck the 99.4%, right? Their deaths don’t mean shit. Apparently. It’s why, as a white man, I have a very difficult time believing in BLMs STATED objective and instead have to believe their visible objective, which is to create anarchy ONLY when a black man is killed by a cop. Regardless of whether it was justified or not.Gil Dobie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 20, 2020 11:52 amDoesn't sound like protesting regular crime is their purpose.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 20, 2020 11:47 am
I guess the real question is this: Why isn’t Chicago rioting over the black-on-black crime that happens there every weekend that dwarfs what happens between blacks and police in a year?
Why do they only riot when one is killed by a policeman? Why are the not equally (or 99.4x more) outraged that the black-on-black crime in their city continues unabated with zero concern expressed?
I think the name Black Lives Matter, confuses people with their actual purposeAZGrizFan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 20, 2020 4:46 pmNo. And inquiring minds want to know WHY. If 99.4% of black crime/deaths mean nothing to BLM, then they are the most ironically named organization since the CFPB. So back to the OP, their name shouldn’t be BLM, but instead BLMBOITAOOTFAAKBRC.....fuck the 99.4%, right? Their deaths don’t mean shit. Apparently. It’s why, as a white man, I have a very difficult time believing in BLMs STATED objective and instead have to believe their visible objective, which is to create anarchy ONLY when a black man is killed by a cop. Regardless of whether it was justified or not.
Black lives truly do NOT matter to them. What else could you possibly deduce from their actions?
I'll tell you why. Back when Obama gave a speech on Father's day, he brought up the fact that many black children were fatherless and they needed to do better. What happened after that? Jesse Jackson threatened to cut that ni#$ers nuts off.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 20, 2020 4:46 pmNo. And inquiring minds want to know WHY. If 99.4% of black crime/deaths mean nothing to BLM, then they are the most ironically named organization since the CFPB. So back to the OP, their name shouldn’t be BLM, but instead BLMBOITAOOTFAAKBRC.....fuck the 99.4%, right? Their deaths don’t mean shit. Apparently. It’s why, as a white man, I have a very difficult time believing in BLMs STATED objective and instead have to believe their visible objective, which is to create anarchy ONLY when a black man is killed by a cop. Regardless of whether it was justified or not.
Black lives truly do NOT matter to them. What else could you possibly deduce from their actions?
powerful. That man gets it. Good for him, and I hope he's successful in his efforts...
