UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:32 pm
SDHornet wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:55 pm
Defending Houndie now?
He's wrong. There was a legit
"can't get back to normal until there is a vax" narrative that was going on. As with every other China Virus policy, the goalposts moved to "hey it reduces symptoms an severity" because the jab doesn't stop the China Virus.
Houndy is like an patient drooling in his pudding cup. He needs all the help he can get.
Yes there was and that was short-sighted and foolish. Adjusting as we go is smart. Being arrogant and just telling people they should do what you say without question or a real explanation is arrogant. Fauxi is obviously arrogant.
The vaccines were supposed to:
1) protect the vaccinated and 2) stop the spread. It's pretty obvious that they aren't working as well as people thought at stopping the spread but they have done a good job at protecting the vaccinated. Focusing almost exclusively on the failure at #2 to question of the efficacy of the vaccines is being intentionally misleading.
1) The overwhelming majority of covid cases in the ICUs and on ventilators are the unvaccinated. You're letting your personal animus cloud your perception.
2) No vaccine is 100% effective - we've been told that from Day 1. And don't forget the variants, at least three so far, which develop in the petri dish of the unvaccinated.
The evidence is overwhelming that the vaccines do what they are supposed to do.
Its supposed to be "drooling in his porridge". I do get that you need to paraphrase in order to avoid to avoid the embarrassment of using metaphors introduced here by the one to whom your feeble attempt at insult is directed. But still, at the same time--
The best way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - Noam Chomsky