FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=49197
Not a thing unreasonable with vetting the criminal the wants to run the country on your behalf.css75 wrote:CAA Flagship wrote:https://www.latimes.com/california/stor ... newsom-law
Trump’s tax returns required under new California election law
Courts will kill it, that is not in the constitution. Gavin and the libs are going to lose this one.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So the constitution is not valid in ,your eyes. The biotch lost, get over it.houndawg wrote:Not a thing unreasonable with vetting the criminal the wants to run the country on your behalf.css75 wrote:
Courts will kill it, that is not in the constitution. Gavin and the libs are going to lose this one.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
BDKJMU wrote:-convicted felon & offender released from custody now = "formerly incarcerated person" or a "justice-involved person" or a “returning resident.”
-drug addicts & substance abusers now = “a person with a history of substance use.”
-juvenile delinquent now = a “young person with justice system involvement,” or a “young person impacted by the juvenile justice system.”
So of your car is broken into in San Fran, you will be “a person who has come in contact with a returning resident who was involved with the justice system and who is currently under supervision with a history of substance use.”
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san-fr ... ved-person
https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bann ... and-pee-mySalon owner Elizabeth Novak says she’s moving her business out of Sacramento, California because she can no longer deal with the capital city’s homeless problem.
Monday, in an interview with Fox News, Novak discussed a viral video she made calling out Governor Gavin Newsom (D) and explaining how she has to “clean up the poop and pee off my doorstep” left by the homeless:
“I’ve had a business in downtown Sacramento for 15 years. I just want to tell you what happens when I get to work: I have to clean up the poop and the pee off of my doorstep.
“I have to politely ask people, who I care for, I care for these people who are homeless, to move their tent. So, I want to know what you’re going to do for us.”
This is just the first result of the police not policing anymoreCol Hogan wrote:A Sacramento business owner is moving because she can no longer take having to clean shit and piss from the front of her business each day all because the local government won’t (or can’t) do anything to help her...
https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bann ... and-pee-mySalon owner Elizabeth Novak says she’s moving her business out of Sacramento, California because she can no longer deal with the capital city’s homeless problem.
Monday, in an interview with Fox News, Novak discussed a viral video she made calling out Governor Gavin Newsom (D) and explaining how she has to “clean up the poop and pee off my doorstep” left by the homeless:
“I’ve had a business in downtown Sacramento for 15 years. I just want to tell you what happens when I get to work: I have to clean up the poop and the pee off of my doorstep.
“I have to politely ask people, who I care for, I care for these people who are homeless, to move their tent. So, I want to know what you’re going to do for us.”
mainejeff2 wrote:Huckabilly going to Fox News.....won't she be a sight to behold! Will make all those leggy blondes look even better!
CID1990 wrote:This is just the first result of the police not policing anymoreCol Hogan wrote:A Sacramento business owner is moving because she can no longer take having to clean shit and piss from the front of her business each day all because the local government won’t (or can’t) do anything to help her...
https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bann ... and-pee-my
Just wait... it will get worse
Eventually they won’t even respond to “dead body on my lawn” calls
And why should they?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
... Don't more than 30 countries have some kind of Fur Ban in place ..?BDKJMU wrote:"...A bill that would ban the sale of fur coats, hats, handbags, gloves and earmuffs, accessories with fur trim and most other uses is whipping through the California legislature, on the heels of similar bans in the state’s two largest cities — Los Angeles and San Francisco....."
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-a ... and-states
California
If only. Was this on any referendum? Was it part of any politician's campaign promise?Chizzang wrote:Don't more than 30 countries have some kind of Fur Ban in place ..?BDKJMU wrote:"...A bill that would ban the sale of fur coats, hats, handbags, gloves and earmuffs, accessories with fur trim and most other uses is whipping through the California legislature, on the heels of similar bans in the state’s two largest cities — Los Angeles and San Francisco....."
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-a ... and-states
California
I don't thinks its that unusual is it?
and if people in a state vote for it - who cares..?
Marijuana is legal all over the place now - it has to start somewhere
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/11/busi ... ntrol.htmlEconomists from both the left and the right have a well-established aversion to rent control, arguing that such policies ignore the message of rising prices, which is to build more housing. Studies in San Francisco and elsewhere show that price caps often prompt landlords to abandon the rental business by converting their units to owner-occupied homes. And since rent controls typically have no income threshold, they have been faulted for benefiting high-income tenants.
“Rent control is definitely having a moment across the country,” said Jim Lapides, a vice president at the National Multifamily Housing Council, which opposes such restrictions. “But we’re seeing folks turn to really shortsighted policy that will end up making the very problem worse.”
I'm surprised we didn't already have this in place.BDKJMU wrote:"...A bill that would ban the sale of fur coats, hats, handbags, gloves and earmuffs, accessories with fur trim and most other uses is whipping through the California legislature, on the heels of similar bans in the state’s two largest cities — Los Angeles and San Francisco....."
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-a ... and-states
California
But will he draw the line at taking a dump?BDKJMU wrote:Have to take a leak in San Francisco? Feel free to piss anywhere in public.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/11/san- ... urination/
Nope. That's the San Francisco treat.Ivytalk wrote:But will he draw the line at taking a dump?BDKJMU wrote:Have to take a leak in San Francisco? Feel free to piss anywhere in public.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/11/san- ... urination/
1) You should be able to pee in public places as long as you're not wagging your dick around for all to see. Freedom! Be a man!BDKJMU wrote:Have to take a leak in San Francisco? Feel free to piss anywhere in public.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/11/san- ... urination/
Or you could tackle the homeless problem by...wait for it...providing homeless housing...with toilets. It's a win-win.Is it easier to do that in places that are super cold? I mean, homelessness and getting people into homeless housing is an easier problem in places like Medicine Hat as compared to a San Fran or LA simply because of the extreme cold outside. Of course the homeless will want to be indoors in those cases. In LA, you could conceivably be outside all year and it wouldn't be a worry. Are homeless shelters and housing at full capacity in San Fran and LA?kalm wrote:1) You should be able to pee in public places as long as you're not wagging your dick around for all to see. Freedom! Be a man!BDKJMU wrote:Have to take a leak in San Francisco? Feel free to piss anywhere in public.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/11/san- ... urination/
2) How much does it cost to prosecute a public urination case or any of the other "quality of life" crimes as the article describes them? Let's throw someone in jail for a month for camping in public.
A city in Alberta (maybe Lethbridge or Medicine Hat?) discovered this a few years back and virtually eliminated homelessness and saved money by building beds.
GannonFan wrote:Is it easier to do that in places that are super cold? I mean, homelessness and getting people into homeless housing is an easier problem in places like Medicine Hat as compared to a San Fran or LA simply because of the extreme cold outside. Of course the homeless will want to be indoors in those cases. In LA, you could conceivably be outside all year and it wouldn't be a worry. Are homeless shelters and housing at full capacity in San Fran and LA?kalm wrote:
1) You should be able to pee in public places as long as you're not wagging your dick around for all to see. Freedom! Be a man!
2) How much does it cost to prosecute a public urination case or any of the other "quality of life" crimes as the article describes them? Let's throw someone in jail for a month for camping in public.
A city in Alberta (maybe Lethbridge or Medicine Hat?) discovered this a few years back and virtually eliminated homelessness and saved money by building beds.
Again, how do you know that they aren't offering shelters? You seem to be making a pretty big leap of thought here in the rush to castigate Christians as well as people who live in states where it gets cold. If a person wants to sleep outside, aren't they going to naturally go where it's warm anyway?dbackjon wrote:GannonFan wrote:
Is it easier to do that in places that are super cold? I mean, homelessness and getting people into homeless housing is an easier problem in places like Medicine Hat as compared to a San Fran or LA simply because of the extreme cold outside. Of course the homeless will want to be indoors in those cases. In LA, you could conceivably be outside all year and it wouldn't be a worry. Are homeless shelters and housing at full capacity in San Fran and LA?
And how many of LA/SF homeless came from some shithole cold/wet weather state/province that DIDN'T offer shelters, so they migrated to places that the weather is decent year-round?
I know a good portion of Phoenix's homeless are transplants.
Maybe if the good Christian people elsewhere would devote resources of their own they could help. But easier to pawn them off on other states then get to act superior.
Not all. Many would rather stay in areas they are familiar, but lack of shelters makes that impossible.GannonFan wrote:Again, how do you know that they aren't offering shelters? You seem to be making a pretty big leap of thought here in the rush to castigate Christians as well as people who live in states where it gets cold. If a person wants to sleep outside, aren't they going to naturally go where it's warm anyway?dbackjon wrote:
And how many of LA/SF homeless came from some shithole cold/wet weather state/province that DIDN'T offer shelters, so they migrated to places that the weather is decent year-round?
I know a good portion of Phoenix's homeless are transplants.
Maybe if the good Christian people elsewhere would devote resources of their own they could help. But easier to pawn them off on other states then get to act superior.
You didn't answer his question.dbackjon wrote:Not all. Many would rather stay in areas they are familiar, but lack of shelters makes that impossible.GannonFan wrote:
Again, how do you know that they aren't offering shelters? You seem to be making a pretty big leap of thought here in the rush to castigate Christians as well as people who live in states where it gets cold. If a person wants to sleep outside, aren't they going to naturally go where it's warm anyway?
I can't speak of every city in depth in terms of how they treat homelessness, but this is a good article on how it's done in Philly. Not perfect, as there are still people on the street, but there are fewer than in other cities of comparable size. Nothing at all in the article that points to Christians as the cause for people living on the street - heck, there's even a nice little write-up on a good Catholic nun who helped lead the charge to get more housing options for the homeless (not just shelters, but subsidized, longer term housing), and had to do so in the face of resistance from the Democratic majority in the city, including the then future mayor John Street. Philly does have an advantage over the SF and LA's of the world - there is still affordable housing in the city. That's a big deal out in CA, and again, has nothing to do with Christians from cold cities foisting their homeless onto those cities.dbackjon wrote:Not all. Many would rather stay in areas they are familiar, but lack of shelters makes that impossible.GannonFan wrote:
Again, how do you know that they aren't offering shelters? You seem to be making a pretty big leap of thought here in the rush to castigate Christians as well as people who live in states where it gets cold. If a person wants to sleep outside, aren't they going to naturally go where it's warm anyway?
Lethbridge has the highest, longest bridge in North America. At least it did back in the 70s.kalm wrote:1) You should be able to pee in public places as long as you're not wagging your dick around for all to see. Freedom! Be a man!BDKJMU wrote:Have to take a leak in San Francisco? Feel free to piss anywhere in public.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/11/san- ... urination/
2) How much does it cost to prosecute a public urination case or any of the other "quality of life" crimes as the article describes them? Let's throw someone in jail for a month for camping in public.
A city in Alberta (maybe Lethbridge or Medicine Hat?) discovered this a few years back and virtually eliminated homelessness and saved money by building beds.
And you know that, because you slept under it.houndawg wrote:Lethbridge has the highest, longest bridge in North America. At least it did back in the 70s.kalm wrote:
1) You should be able to pee in public places as long as you're not wagging your dick around for all to see. Freedom! Be a man!
2) How much does it cost to prosecute a public urination case or any of the other "quality of life" crimes as the article describes them? Let's throw someone in jail for a month for camping in public.
A city in Alberta (maybe Lethbridge or Medicine Hat?) discovered this a few years back and virtually eliminated homelessness and saved money by building beds.