If what's being referenced by the allusion to "collusion" is the allegation that there was collusion between people in the Trump campaign and Russia, the author appears to be going along with the myth that the Mueller Report showed "no collusion." It did not. It documented collusion between Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign director, and Konstantin Kilimnik. Subsequent results of Congressional investigations validated the account. See https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/nation ... p-n1264371. The idea that the allegation of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia has been debunked and shown to be a "hoax" is false.CID1990 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 09, 2021 6:16 pm WSJ article ..
To criticize the collusion hoax would be to cut oneself off from the institutional gravy train of the entire Democratic and media establishment, since all are implicated, with the exception of a handful of left-wing reporters who are dismissed as cranks for seeing what’s in front of their eyes.
Remember, it was Stacey Abrams, not Donald Trump, who invented a successful modern career model by rejecting the legitimacy of her election defeat.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What Stacey Abrams did is not the same as what Trump did at all. She refused to concede in one sense. but did say she knew that her opponent would legally be certified as the winner. Here statement was:
She did not attempt to change the result of the election. She did not allege voter fraud. Instead, she alleged voter suppression. She alleged that things were done to keep some people from voting at all. She did launch legal action against Georgia's election system. But it was not an effort to change the results of her election. It was an effort to prevent what she saw as voter suppression efforts in the future."Concession means to acknowledge an action is right, true or proper. As a woman of conscience and faith, I cannot concede. But my assessment is that the law currently allows no further viable remedy,"
That is very different than what Trump did and as continued to do.
This thing of saying that what Abrams did is what Trump is doing is just false.
Here's another article on what Abrams did:
https://apnews.com/article/north-americ ... 5cb0204307
She did not try to challenge the certified outcome. Saying she acted like Trump is acting is completely false.Abrams, meanwhile, sent volunteers across the state in search of voters whose ballots were rejected. She filed suit in federal court to force county elections boards to count absentee ballots with incorrect birthdates. Her campaign even planned for possible litigation to challenge the election’s certified outcome.
Abrams didn’t take that route. She said she had concluded “the law currently allows no further viable remedy.” Instead, she said she would fight to restore integrity to Georgia’s election system in a new initiative called Fair Fight Georgia.
