Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://www.politico.com/gallery/2016/07 ... 26?slide=0

Ginsburg embarrasses herself and American justice.

She blathers on, in multiple media outlets, and then says that in the future she'll be more circumspect.

WHAT future? She's 150 years old.

Typical Liberal...intentionally say something and then say that they'll be more careful next time.


THIS IS WHAT JSO WANTS ON THE SUPREME COURT.

I don't agree with her judicial philosophy but she was absolutely correct in what she had to say about Trump.

The fact that Trump won the Republican Party nomination and is a serious threat to actually end up as President is a much bigger embarrassment to the United States than anything Ginsburg did or can say or do. The fact that Trump is where he is says something very negative about the population itself. It's bad.

JohnStOnge wrote:I don't agree with her judicial philosophy but she was absolutely correct in what she had to say about Trump.

The fact that Trump won the Republican Party nomination and is a serious threat to actually end up as President is a much bigger embarrassment to the United States than anything Ginsburg did or can say or do. The fact that Trump is where he is says something very negative about the population itself. It's bad.

So what are you going to do about that population, Dr. Mengele?

Ivytalk wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:I don't agree with her judicial philosophy but she was absolutely correct in what she had to say about Trump.

The fact that Trump won the Republican Party nomination and is a serious threat to actually end up as President is a much bigger embarrassment to the United States than anything Ginsburg did or can say or do. The fact that Trump is where he is says something very negative about the population itself. It's bad.

So what are you going to do about that population, Dr. Mengele?

Leather lampshades!

There's obviously nothing I or anybody else can do. But we should all be concerned that there are so may people in the population who would actually vote for Donald Trump to be President. And even if it ends up being a Clinton blowout the concern will remain. That this guy is getting anything more than like 5% support from the fringe is a severe indictment on the population of the United States. It does not portend wll for the future of this country.

JohnStOnge wrote:There's obviously nothing I or anybody else can do. But we should all be concerned that there are so may people in the population who would actually vote for Donald Trump to be President. And even if it ends up being a Clinton blowout the concern will remain. That this guy is getting anything more than like 5% support from the fringe is a severe indictment on the population of the United States. It does not portend wll for the future of this country.

Thank you, Mr. Himmler.

So much fir an impartial supreme court, she is a joke.

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Jjoey52 wrote:So much fir an impartial supreme court, she is a joke.

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Who ever said the Supreme Court was fair and impartial..?
The last Justice that died was about as impartial as Jimmy Swaggert

I thought this was the kind of thing that got you hot and sweaty for Trump, Cluck?

Speaking without a filter, without caring about offending, without a care for any unwritten rules, etc.





Now you're going to have a cry because an old lady said something mean?

Skjellyfetti wrote:I thought this was the kind of thing that got you hot and sweaty for Trump, Cluck?

Speaking without a filter, without caring about offending, without a care for any unwritten rules, etc.





Now you're going to have a cry because an old lady said something mean?

Im going to just assume you are playing dumb, and you actually do know the difference between a politician and a scotus justice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JohnStOnge wrote:There's obviously nothing I or anybody else can do. But we should all be concerned that there are so may people in the population who would actually vote for Donald Trump to be President. And even if it ends up being a Clinton blowout the concern will remain. That this guy is getting anything more than like 5% support from the fringe is a severe indictment on the population of the United States. It does not portend wll for the future of this country.

It's called the "southern strategy", John. You spend 40 years carefully crafting a base of the ignorant and bigoted, focusing on the ones that are dumb enough to believe that what is good for billionaires is good for Bubba, and then the whole damn thing blows up in your face when some yankee from New York comes along and steals the stupid fvcks right out from under you.

The cream of the jest indeed.

houndawg wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:There's obviously nothing I or anybody else can do. But we should all be concerned that there are so may people in the population who would actually vote for Donald Trump to be President. And even if it ends up being a Clinton blowout the concern will remain. That this guy is getting anything more than like 5% support from the fringe is a severe indictment on the population of the United States. It does not portend wll for the future of this country.

It's called the "southern strategy", John. You spend 40 years carefully crafting a base of the ignorant and bigoted, focusing on the ones that are dumb enough to believe that what is good for billionaires is good for Bubba, and then the whole damn thing blows up in your face when some yankee from New York comes along and steals the stupid fvcks right out from under you.

The cream of the jest indeed.

Bazinga..!!!
(as they say in New York)

CID1990 wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:I thought this was the kind of thing that got you hot and sweaty for Trump, Cluck?

Speaking without a filter, without caring about offending, without a care for any unwritten rules, etc.





Now you're going to have a cry because an old lady said something mean?

Im going to just assume you are playing dumb, and you actually do know the difference between a politician and a scotus justice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah! Scotus justices go hunting with Dick Cheney and attend gala weekends hosted by think tanks!

Amirite?

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Im going to just assume you are playing dumb, and you actually do know the difference between a politician and a scotus justice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah! Scotus justices go hunting with Dick Cheney and attend gala weekends hosted by think tanks!

Amirite?

And leave their wives at home.

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Im going to just assume you are playing dumb, and you actually do know the difference between a politician and a scotus justice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah! Scotus justices go hunting with Dick Cheney and attend gala weekends hosted by think tanks!

Amirite?

I see Felchy ha company on the short bus today.

CID1990 wrote:

kalm wrote:
Yeah! Scotus justices go hunting with Dick Cheney and attend gala weekends hosted by think tanks!

Amirite?

I see Felchy ha company on the short bus today.

Oh no, I get what your saying. Scotus justices should stay away from appearing political....

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
I see Felchy ha company on the short bus today.

Oh no, I get what your saying. Scotus justices should stay away from appearing political....

...on the eve of a potentially close election.


But yeah- let's minimize it with BUT BUSH

houndawg wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:There's obviously nothing I or anybody else can do. But we should all be concerned that there are so may people in the population who would actually vote for Donald Trump to be President. And even if it ends up being a Clinton blowout the concern will remain. That this guy is getting anything more than like 5% support from the fringe is a severe indictment on the population of the United States. It does not portend wll for the future of this country.

It's called the "southern strategy", John. You spend 40 years carefully crafting a base of the ignorant and bigoted, focusing on the ones that are dumb enough to believe that what is good for billionaires is good for Bubba, and then the whole damn thing blows up in your face when some yankee from New York comes along and steals the stupid fvcks right out from under you.

The cream of the jest indeed.

Says the one who will line up at the trough right beside JSO and pull the lever for the candidate from Wall Street.

Lets all stop the charade...

Yes Ginsburg broke the unwritten rule - but who was confused about her before she opened her mouth..?
And Scalia skirted that edge for years hanging with the GOP elite just beyond plain sight

Do you really care if she announces that Trump is a bit of a dunce and alarmingly dangerous ..?
Isn't that why we all kinda like him anyway
and HELL - fully 50% of his charm is he pisses people like her off..?

houndawg wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:There's obviously nothing I or anybody else can do. But we should all be concerned that there are so may people in the population who would actually vote for Donald Trump to be President. And even if it ends up being a Clinton blowout the concern will remain. That this guy is getting anything more than like 5% support from the fringe is a severe indictment on the population of the United States. It does not portend wll for the future of this country.

It's called the "southern strategy", John. You spend 40 years carefully crafting a base of the ignorant and bigoted, focusing on the ones that are dumb enough to believe that what is good for billionaires is good for Bubba, and then the whole damn thing blows up in your face when some yankee from New York comes along and steals the stupid fvcks right out from under you.

The cream of the jest indeed.

Chizzang wrote:Lets all stop the charade...

Yes Ginsburg broke the unwritten rule - but who was confused about her before she opened her mouth..?
And Scalia skirted that edge for years hanging with the GOP elite just beyond plain sight

Do you really care if she announces that Trump is a bit of a dunce and alarmingly dangerous ..?
Isn't that why we all kinda like him anyway
and HELL - fully 50% of his charm is he pisses people like her off..?

Well, true. Ginsburg isn't exactly an unknown quantity

But according to all my liberal friends here at work she's a as pure as the wind driven snow

unlike that Nazi Scalia

CID1990 wrote:

kalm wrote:
Oh no, I get what your saying. Scotus justices should stay away from appearing political....

...on the eve of a potentially close election.


But yeah- let's minimize it with BUT BUSH

I don't think it's appropriate in either case.

CID1990 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:Lets all stop the charade...

Yes Ginsburg broke the unwritten rule - but who was confused about her before she opened her mouth..?
And Scalia skirted that edge for years hanging with the GOP elite just beyond plain sight

Do you really care if she announces that Trump is a bit of a dunce and alarmingly dangerous ..?
Isn't that why we all kinda like him anyway
and HELL - fully 50% of his charm is he pisses people like her off..?

Well, true. Ginsburg isn't exactly an unknown quantity

But according to all my liberal friends here at work she's a as pure as the wind driven snow

unlike that Nazi Scalia

Your pussy Liberal friends are simply fulfilling their slow decent into the destiny of shame
be gentle with them


I like to give them this look just before I walk away:

Chizzang wrote:Lets all stop the charade...

Yes Ginsburg broke the unwritten rule - but who was confused about her before she opened her mouth..?
And Scalia skirted that edge for years hanging with the GOP elite just beyond plain sight

Do you really care if she announces that Trump is a bit of a dunce and alarmingly dangerous ..?
Isn't that why we all kinda like him anyway
and HELL - fully 50% of his charm is he pisses people like her off..?

Whatever happened to the boy he took to the party where he croaked?