FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=45819
How incredibly divisive.WARSAW — President Obama condemned the sniper-style shootings of Dallas police officers Friday, calling the assault a "vicious, calculated and despicable attack on law enforcement.
"I believe I speak for every single American when I say we are horrified over these events, and we stand united with the people and the police department in Dallas," he said.
Obama said he spoke with Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings, and offered him condolences and federal assistance.
Dallas police said at least five officers were killed and seven more injured by gunfire in downtown Dallas during what had been a peaceful protest over police-involved shootings Thursday night.
After almost an hour of negotiations, the heavily armed gunman — who was holed up in a building that overlooked the protest route — was killed by police using a robot-controlled explosive device. Three other people have been arrested.
"We will learn more, undoubtedly, about their twisted motivations, but let’s be clear: There is no possible justification for these types of attacks," Obama said. "Anyone involved in the senseless murders will be held fully accountable. Justice will be done."
Like closing the barn door after you ran the horse out.Grizalltheway wrote:How incredibly divisive.WARSAW — President Obama condemned the sniper-style shootings of Dallas police officers Friday, calling the assault a "vicious, calculated and despicable attack on law enforcement.
"I believe I speak for every single American when I say we are horrified over these events, and we stand united with the people and the police department in Dallas," he said.
Obama said he spoke with Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings, and offered him condolences and federal assistance.
Dallas police said at least five officers were killed and seven more injured by gunfire in downtown Dallas during what had been a peaceful protest over police-involved shootings Thursday night.
After almost an hour of negotiations, the heavily armed gunman — who was holed up in a building that overlooked the protest route — was killed by police using a robot-controlled explosive device. Three other people have been arrested.
"We will learn more, undoubtedly, about their twisted motivations, but let’s be clear: There is no possible justification for these types of attacks," Obama said. "Anyone involved in the senseless murders will be held fully accountable. Justice will be done."
Do you think Trump will do any better?AZGrizFan wrote:That the country HE has presided over for 8 years is disintegrating before his eyes.
And that his divisive words and actions have accelerated that disintegration.
Trump - unknownmrklean wrote:Do you think Trump will do any better?AZGrizFan wrote:That the country HE has presided over for 8 years is disintegrating before his eyes.
And that his divisive words and actions have accelerated that disintegration.
You were gone? Damn..Chizzang wrote:Italy was nice... did I miss anything important while I was away
or just more of the same
Why's that? Serious question.AZGrizFan wrote:Johnson - Better. Way better
Because he has political experience (unlike Trump) and is a known quantity, and believes in fiscal conservatism. And regarding social issues, believes the government should stay out of it.89Hen wrote:Why's that? Serious question.AZGrizFan wrote:Johnson - Better. Way better
A rotting corpse would be better than Trump or Clinton.AZGrizFan wrote:Because he has political experience (unlike Trump) and is a known quantity, and believes in fiscal conservatism. And regarding social issues, believes the government should stay out of it.89Hen wrote: Why's that? Serious question.
And when I say "way better", I mean way better than the other two alternatives.
He might be less divisive just because he's unknown (he's NOT a known quantity by a vast majority of people), but I don't know enough of his social policies to be able to say he'd be less divisive over time. I still can't get over the fact that he is proud to have vetoed his state legislature 750 times in his administration. My way or the highway isn't a very unifying position IMO.AZGrizFan wrote:Because he has political experience (unlike Trump) and is a known quantity, and believes in fiscal conservatism. And regarding social issues, believes the government should stay out of it.89Hen wrote: Why's that? Serious question.
And when I say "way better", I mean way better than the other two alternatives.
What horse are we talking about exactly? Did I miss where he called for black people to start gunning down cops?AZGrizFan wrote:Like closing the barn door after you ran the horse out.Grizalltheway wrote:
How incredibly divisive.
Gotta go with Z on this one. Johnson has my vote.AZGrizFan wrote:Because he has political experience (unlike Trump) and is a known quantity, and believes in fiscal conservatism. And regarding social issues, believes the government should stay out of it.89Hen wrote: Why's that? Serious question.
And when I say "way better", I mean way better than the other two alternatives.
It's hardly foolproof, but Johnson is by far my strongest candidate.89Hen wrote:He might be less divisive just because he's unknown (he's NOT a known quantity by a vast majority of people), but I don't know enough of his social policies to be able to say he'd be less divisive over time. I still can't get over the fact that he is proud to have vetoed his state legislature 750 times in his administration. My way or the highway isn't a very unifying position IMO.AZGrizFan wrote:
Because he has political experience (unlike Trump) and is a known quantity, and believes in fiscal conservatism. And regarding social issues, believes the government should stay out of it.
And when I say "way better", I mean way better than the other two alternatives.
I've already done that one. Nobody is nearly as high as they should be for me. I usually have a candidate in the high 80's but nobody cracked 80 this go round.ASUG8 wrote:It's hardly foolproof, but Johnson is by far my strongest candidate.
https://www.isidewith.com/
What a fucking drama queen.AZGrizFan wrote:That the country HE has presided over for 8 years is disintegrating before his eyes.
Who are you leaning toward voting for, Hen?89Hen wrote:He might be less divisive just because he's unknown (he's NOT a known quantity by a vast majority of people), but I don't know enough of his social policies to be able to say he'd be less divisive over time. I still can't get over the fact that he is proud to have vetoed his state legislature 750 times in his administration. My way or the highway isn't a very unifying position IMO.AZGrizFan wrote:
Because he has political experience (unlike Trump) and is a known quantity, and believes in fiscal conservatism. And regarding social issues, believes the government should stay out of it.
And when I say "way better", I mean way better than the other two alternatives.
I've said it in other threads... NOTA. Gonna sit this one out. Will only be voting for local folks. Doesn't matter anyway when you live in a county that is 70% one party.Skjellyfetti wrote:Who are you leaning toward voting for, Hen?89Hen wrote: He might be less divisive just because he's unknown (he's NOT a known quantity by a vast majority of people), but I don't know enough of his social policies to be able to say he'd be less divisive over time. I still can't get over the fact that he is proud to have vetoed his state legislature 750 times in his administration. My way or the highway isn't a very unifying position IMO.
I'm mid 80's with Johnson, with Trump about 10 points behind.89Hen wrote:I've already done that one. Nobody is nearly as high as they should be for me. I usually have a candidate in the high 80's but nobody cracked 80 this go round.ASUG8 wrote:It's hardly foolproof, but Johnson is by far my strongest candidate.
https://www.isidewith.com/
And what's "known" about Trump? Only what the vast majority of people see on "The Apprentice".89Hen wrote:He might be less divisive just because he's unknown (he's NOT a known quantity by a vast majority of people), but I don't know enough of his social policies to be able to say he'd be less divisive over time. I still can't get over the fact that he is proud to have vetoed his state legislature 750 times in his administration. My way or the highway isn't a very unifying position IMO.AZGrizFan wrote:
Because he has political experience (unlike Trump) and is a known quantity, and believes in fiscal conservatism. And regarding social issues, believes the government should stay out of it.
And when I say "way better", I mean way better than the other two alternatives.
Won't matter, given the electoral college process.89Hen wrote:BTW, do you guys still think Johnson will get double digit percentage of the general? I think a few of you said that.
It DOES matter, Hen. If you vote your conscience, and people begin to understand that there's OTHERS out there who feel the way they do, then people won't keep believing that a third party vote is a "wasted vote". Until people start exercising their right to vote and sending a message to congress and the government in general, we'll be stuck with the current 2-party system....89Hen wrote:I've said it in other threads... NOTA. Gonna sit this one out. Will only be voting for local folks. Doesn't matter anyway when you live in a county that is 70% one party.Skjellyfetti wrote:
Who are you leaning toward voting for, Hen?
