FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=45554
andy7171 wrote:
That's called a Palouse Orgasm, son.Ibanez wrote:andy7171 wrote:
I've heard of a bag of dicks..but that's just ridiculous.
andy7171 wrote:That's called a Palouse Orgasm, son.Ibanez wrote:
I've heard of a bag of dicks..but that's just ridiculous.
You're going to have to work harder than that to provoke any deep thoughts with this crowd.Ivytalk wrote:Crap. What was intended as a thought-provoking thread has turned into a tribute to gooeyducks.
CitadelGrad wrote:The neofascist reaction, the force behind Trump,
Why would anyone read beyond these opening seven words of the article?
Yep. As soon as I read that opening sentence I knew it had to be garbage and read no further..CitadelGrad wrote:The neofascist reaction, the force behind Trump,
Why would anyone read beyond these opening seven words of the article?
BDKJMU wrote:Yep. As soon as I read that opening sentence I knew it had to be garbage and read no further..CitadelGrad wrote:The neofascist reaction, the force behind Trump,
Why would anyone read beyond these opening seven words of the article?
In swoops Clizzoris from his 30,000 foot perch to remind us all that we're not logicalChizzang wrote:I'm confused...
So by the reactions above I get the feeling neofascism is bad..?
Because American Patriotism right now (today) is absolutely modern fascism
And I'm not entirely sure that bothers me...
I suppose we can spend a lot of energy trying to deny that's what it is - but why..?
Chizzang wrote:I'm confused...
So by the reactions above I get the feeling neofascism is bad..?
Because American Patriotism right now (today) is absolutely modern fascism
And I'm not entirely sure that bothers me...
I suppose we can spend a lot of energy trying to deny that's what it is - but why..?
Fascism was strongly based in nationalism. Some of today's uber-patriots have a populist streak in them that rejects the coporatist side of fascism.Cluck U wrote:Chizzang wrote:I'm confused...
So by the reactions above I get the feeling neofascism is bad..?
Because American Patriotism right now (today) is absolutely modern fascism
And I'm not entirely sure that bothers me...
I suppose we can spend a lot of energy trying to deny that's what it is - but why..?
WTF?
Fascism (and Neofascism...or whatever flavor of the month word people want to use to bend definitions) has a lot more to it than simply patriotism.
Wow, post of the year fail.
I'll sum this up for the low brained CS.er's here...Ivytalk wrote:Quite frankly, before reading this piece, I head never heard of Anis Shivani. Just another New Age social critic, for my money. The subtext of his piece is that, regardless of who wins the election -- and he obviously picks Trump -- "the market" will win in the long run. The globalist horse is out of the barn and cannot be contained. Trump voters are bound to be disappointed with this outcome, especially when they see that Trump won't be able to steer the USA (much less the world) back to the pre-Smoot Hawley days of 90 years ago, or even the more recent pre-EU days. NAFTA is a convenient "whipping boy," but repealing it in favor of protective tariffs won't give any of those people a job and will raise prices of consumer goods for everyone. The real challenge for the next President is to figure out how to equip (and train) current and future generations for this reality. No easy solutions here.
On a lighter note, I LOL'ed at "embeddedness."
That's DISGUSTING, andy!andy7171 wrote:I'll sum this up for the low brained CS.er's here...Ivytalk wrote:Quite frankly, before reading this piece, I head never heard of Anis Shivani. Just another New Age social critic, for my money. The subtext of his piece is that, regardless of who wins the election -- and he obviously picks Trump -- "the market" will win in the long run. The globalist horse is out of the barn and cannot be contained. Trump voters are bound to be disappointed with this outcome, especially when they see that Trump won't be able to steer the USA (much less the world) back to the pre-Smoot Hawley days of 90 years ago, or even the more recent pre-EU days. NAFTA is a convenient "whipping boy," but repealing it in favor of protective tariffs won't give any of those people a job and will raise prices of consumer goods for everyone. The real challenge for the next President is to figure out how to equip (and train) current and future generations for this reality. No easy solutions here.
On a lighter note, I LOL'ed at "embeddedness."
"Blah, blah, blah..."
"Come and get it sons! Father Kalmy has provided, Great Odin lives!"
No...that's fucking righteous, Andy!Ivytalk wrote:That's DISGUSTING, andy!andy7171 wrote: I'll sum this up for the low brained CS.er's here...
"Blah, blah, blah..."
"Come and get it sons! Father Kalmy has provided, Great Odin lives!"
I love how Smoot-Hawley has become the Saul Alinksy for you and Ganny.Ivytalk wrote:Quite frankly, before reading this piece, I head never heard of Anis Shivani. Just another New Age social critic, for my money. The subtext of his piece is that, regardless of who wins the election -- and he obviously picks Trump -- "the market" will win in the long run. The globalist horse is out of the barn and cannot be contained. Trump voters are bound to be disappointed with this outcome, especially when they see that Trump won't be able to steer the USA (much less the world) back to the pre-Smoot Hawley days of 90 years ago, or even the more recent pre-EU days. NAFTA is a convenient "whipping boy," but repealing it in favor of protective tariffs won't give any of those people a job and will raise prices of consumer goods for everyone. The real challenge for the next President is to figure out how to equip (and train) current and future generations for this reality. No easy solutions here.
On a lighter note, I LOL'ed at "embeddedness."
So, what's your solution, smart guy? Public financing of elections?kalm wrote:I love how Smoot-Hawley has become the Saul Alinksy for you and Ganny.Ivytalk wrote:Quite frankly, before reading this piece, I head never heard of Anis Shivani. Just another New Age social critic, for my money. The subtext of his piece is that, regardless of who wins the election -- and he obviously picks Trump -- "the market" will win in the long run. The globalist horse is out of the barn and cannot be contained. Trump voters are bound to be disappointed with this outcome, especially when they see that Trump won't be able to steer the USA (much less the world) back to the pre-Smoot Hawley days of 90 years ago, or even the more recent pre-EU days. NAFTA is a convenient "whipping boy," but repealing it in favor of protective tariffs won't give any of those people a job and will raise prices of consumer goods for everyone. The real challenge for the next President is to figure out how to equip (and train) current and future generations for this reality. No easy solutions here.
On a lighter note, I LOL'ed at "embeddedness."
Bottom line, we've traded our manufacturing jobs for cheap consumer goods and greater government dependency to buy those goods. The people who decided that swap are VERY pleased with the arrangement! What fantastic deal!
