Page 1 of 2

CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 5:30 am
by Pwns
If the election were today who would you vote for?

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 5:53 am
by kalm

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:07 am
by Ibanez
I voted undecided. I fall into the Never Hillary crowd but aside from that I don't know if i'll abstain or not.

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:27 am
by HI54UNI
I voted undecided but that's not necessarily true. My preference at this point would be Gary Johnson or to write in Rand Paul. But if Iowa is at all close between Trump and Hillary I will vote for Trump. #NeverHillary.

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:29 am
by Ibanez
HI54UNI wrote:I voted undecided but that's not necessarily true. My preference at this point would be Gary Johnson or to write in Rand Paul. But if Iowa is at all close between Trump and Hillary I will vote for Trump. #NeverHillary.
I'm in South Carolina so unless I vote for Trump, my vote doesn't matter.


How sad is that? :cry:

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:38 am
by kalm
Ibanez wrote:
HI54UNI wrote:I voted undecided but that's not necessarily true. My preference at this point would be Gary Johnson or to write in Rand Paul. But if Iowa is at all close between Trump and Hillary I will vote for Trump. #NeverHillary.
I'm in South Carolina so unless I vote for Trump, my vote doesn't matter.


How sad is that? :cry:
It matters if you vote 3rd party.

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:40 am
by Ibanez
kalm wrote:
Ibanez wrote: I'm in South Carolina so unless I vote for Trump, my vote doesn't matter.


How sad is that? :cry:
It matters if you vote 3rd party.
:suspicious: You know, I used to think that.


Used to.

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:43 am
by kalm
Ibanez wrote:
kalm wrote:
It matters if you vote 3rd party.
:suspicious: You know, I used to think that.


Used to.
You still should, for multiple reasons.

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:50 am
by Ibanez
kalm wrote:
Ibanez wrote: :suspicious: You know, I used to think that.


Used to.
You still should, for multiple reasons.
We'll see. If Bernie runs as an independent or 3rd party, I'd consider voting for him. He might have a shot, especially since independents would be able to vote for him in those states that had closed primaries.

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:52 am
by DSUrocks07
http://postlibertarian.com/2012/09/21/t ... threshold/

Vote Gary Johnson, not so he can win, so America can win. :thumb:

Especially if you aren't in a battleground state.

I don't believe in the "wasted vote" mantra.

Lose the battle, win the war.

One thing I learned is that if a Libertarian candidate gets more than 25% of the vote, they are considered a "major party" and qualifies for matching funding that the Dems and GOP gets.

Proportionally once it goes above 5%.

A wasted vote to me would be to vote for either major party when it's solidly in one sides favor.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:59 am
by clenz
DSUrocks07 wrote:http://postlibertarian.com/2012/09/21/t ... threshold/

Vote Gary Johnson, not so he can win, so America can win. :thumb:

Especially if you aren't in a battleground state.

I don't believe in the "wasted vote" mantra.

Lose the battle, win the war.

One thing I learned is that if a Libertarian candidate gets more than 25% of the vote, they are considered a "major party" and qualifies for matching funding that the Dems and GOP gets.

Proportionally once it goes above 5%.

A wasted vote to me would be to vote for either major party when it's solidly in one sides favor.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Same message I tell everyone when they tell me I'm wasting a vote or ask who I'm voting for

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 7:06 am
by kalm
clenz wrote:
DSUrocks07 wrote:http://postlibertarian.com/2012/09/21/t ... threshold/

Vote Gary Johnson, not so he can win, so America can win. :thumb:

Especially if you aren't in a battleground state.

I don't believe in the "wasted vote" mantra.

Lose the battle, win the war.

One thing I learned is that if a Libertarian candidate gets more than 25% of the vote, they are considered a "major party" and qualifies for matching funding that the Dems and GOP gets.

Proportionally once it goes above 5%.

A wasted vote to me would be to vote for either major party when it's solidly in one sides favor.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Same message I tell everyone when they tell me I'm wasting a vote or ask who I'm voting for
+2

Voting for the establishment at this point is for stooges.

:loser:

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 7:25 am
by 93henfan
Who else, but The DonaldĀ®?

You'd be insane to vote for the sociopathic corporatist Clinton dynasty.

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 7:33 am
by 93henfan
Hillary in last? I guess the faggots, hippies, unemployed, and muslicansĀ® (that's my new term for brown people in general) haven't rolled out of bed yet.

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 7:35 am
by Pwns
93henfan wrote:Hillary in last? I guess the faggots, hippies, unemployed, and muslicansĀ® (that's my new term for brown people in general) haven't rolled out of bed yet.
We have too many uncle tom kneegrows here. :ohno:

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 7:56 am
by YoUDeeMan
DSUrocks07 wrote:http://postlibertarian.com/2012/09/21/t ... threshold/

Vote Gary Johnson, not so he can win, so America can win. :thumb:

Especially if you aren't in a battleground state.

I don't believe in the "wasted vote" mantra.

Lose the battle, win the war.

One thing I learned is that if a Libertarian candidate gets more than 25% of the vote, they are considered a "major party" and qualifies for matching funding that the Dems and GOP gets.

Proportionally once it goes above 5%.

A wasted vote to me would be to vote for either major party when it's solidly in one sides favor.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
THIS.

In states where your vote doesn't matter, vote 3rd party. :nod:

In contested states, vote for Trump. He is the only way we bust this broken system. :nod:

Re: RE: Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 8:12 am
by DSUrocks07
Cluck U wrote:
DSUrocks07 wrote:http://postlibertarian.com/2012/09/21/t ... threshold/

Vote Gary Johnson, not so he can win, so America can win. :thumb:

Especially if you aren't in a battleground state.

I don't believe in the "wasted vote" mantra.

Lose the battle, win the war.

One thing I learned is that if a Libertarian candidate gets more than 25% of the vote, they are considered a "major party" and qualifies for matching funding that the Dems and GOP gets.

Proportionally once it goes above 5%.

A wasted vote to me would be to vote for either major party when it's solidly in one sides favor.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
THIS.

In states where your vote doesn't matter, vote 3rd party. :nod:

In contested states, vote for Trump. He is the only way we bust this broken system. :nod:
Admittingly, Austin Petersen is more Libertarian, but Gary Johnson has the name recognition. He's the sacrificial lamb :nod:

Once LP is seen more as a viable mainstream alternative, we will truly see change in this country.

I will follow the polls through November 1st, but if Delaware is close (within margin of error), I'm voting Trump, if it looks to go Dem for the seven cycle in a row I'm voting Johnson. :nod:



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 9:36 am
by TheDancinMonarch
Put on 2 pair of gloves and a clothespin on my nose and then voted Trump. What a horrible choice! 300 million plus people and this is the choice we get. How sad!

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 9:39 am
by Chizzang
If I'm reading the POLL numbers correctly Jill Stein is winning...
3 undecided / 3 Unknown 3rd party / 1 fuck it

That's 7 votes for Jill Stein right there


:coffee:

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 9:43 am
by andy7171
Hillary with one vote. Unless Travis is lurking, Kalmy's vote to glaring!

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 9:49 am
by dbackjon
It is really, really astounding that college educated people would even consider voting for Trump.

A dangerous, dangerous man, who is completely unprepared to run a country.



As for Hillary, looks like the 20 years of Right-wing Lies about the Clintons have worked. Would have thought you all would be smarter than that.

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 9:50 am
by dbackjon
Then there are the Libertarians that live in fantasy land that Libertarians policies would actually work in today's world :lmao:

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 9:53 am
by CAA Flagship
dbackjon wrote:It is really, really astounding that college educated people would even consider voting for Trump.

A dangerous, dangerous man, who is completely unprepared to run a country.



As for Hillary, looks like the 20 years of Right-wing Lies about the Clintons have worked. Would have thought you all would be smarter than that.
:rofl:
Isn't a little early to be drunk?

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 10:00 am
by kalm
andy7171 wrote:Hillary with one vote. Unless Travis is lurking, Kalmy's vote to glaring!
*too

Re: CS.com May 2016 General Election Poll

Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 10:17 am
by Pwns
dbackjon wrote:It is really, really astounding that college educated people would even consider voting for Trump.

A dangerous, dangerous man, who is completely unprepared to run a country.



As for Hillary, looks like the 20 years of Right-wing Lies about the Clintons have worked. Would have thought you all would be smarter than that.
Should a pro-single-payer-health-care, anti-Citizens-United, pro-break-up-the-big-banks, anti-interventionist, pro-minimum-wage-raising progressive vote for Hillary?