Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

"....This new policy statement replaces unnecessarily disparaging labels with terms like “person who committed a crime” and “individual who was incarcerated,”.....

.......President Barack Obama announced in 2015 federal agencies would no longer ask if people were felons in the early job application steps.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/04/doj-d ... -feelings/

You can't make this shit up.. Stupid libbtards.. Next up will be full voting rights to vote donk..

BDKJMU wrote:"....This new policy statement replaces unnecessarily disparaging labels with terms like “person who committed a crime” and “individual who was incarcerated,”.....

.......President Barack Obama announced in 2015 federal agencies would no longer ask if people were felons in the early job application steps.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/04/doj-d ... -feelings/

You can't make this shit up.. Stupid libbtards.. Next up will be full voting rights to vote donk..

Our Republic is no more.

BDKJMU wrote: .......President Barack Obama announced in 2015 federal agencies would no longer ask if people were felons in the early job application steps.

Does this mean that you'll be asked about it later? I have no doubt they will at some point and by some methodology determine whether you are or are not a felon.

PC run amok, trying to preserve peoples' feewings.

As long as we make an exception for global warming skeptics, I'm all right with this.

BDKJMU wrote:"....This new policy statement replaces unnecessarily disparaging labels with terms like “person who committed a crime” and “individual who was incarcerated,”.....

.......President Barack Obama announced in 2015 federal agencies would no longer ask if people were felons in the early job application steps.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/04/doj-d ... -feelings/

You can't make this **** up.. Stupid libbtards.. Next up will be full voting rights to vote donk..

Does this mean we have to stop calling you the village idiot?

BDKJMU wrote:"....This new policy statement replaces unnecessarily disparaging labels with terms like “person who committed a crime” and “individual who was incarcerated,”.....

.......President Barack Obama announced in 2015 federal agencies would no longer ask if people were felons in the early job application steps.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/04/doj-d ... -feelings/

You can't make this **** up.. Stupid libbtards.. Next up will be full voting rights to vote donk..

and Concealed Carry.

Wait...so how is saying the definition of Felon better or less disparaging? That don't make no sense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have no problem with this what so ever. It's a work place policy/philosophy, it's not big brother telling people what they can't say on their own time.

I employed a violent felon who did hard time for an assault he committed when he was 18. He owns that shit and now has a beautiful family and a career. He is extremely contemplative and reflective about his actions and experiences in prison. He doesn't need to be defined as a felon. He will spend the rest of his life reconciling that shit on his own.

I realize they're not all like that, but as long as they are being released, it's in all of our best interests to soften the landing so they can be re-assimilated.

If a felon is offended or hurt by being called a felon I say they aren't penitent enough and should go back in for another year or so until they aren't offended or hurt by being called a felon.

kalm wrote:I have no problem with this what so ever. It's a work place policy/philosophy, it's not big brother telling people what they can't say on their own time.

I employed a violent felon who did hard time for an assault he committed when he was 18. He owns that shit and now has a beautiful family and a career. He is extremely contemplative and reflective about his actions and experiences in prison. He doesn't need to be defined as a felon. He will spend the rest of his life reconciling that shit on his own.

I realize they're not all like that, but as long as they are being released, it's in all of our best interests to soften the landing so they can be re-assimilated.

Shame on you kalm. You really think Jesus would give someone a second chance to atone for past transgressions?

CID1990 wrote:If a felon is offended or hurt by being called a felon I say they aren't penitent enough and should go back in for another year or so until they aren't offended or hurt by being called a felon.

Are felons really complaining about this? Or is it just more liberal BS to get employers to hire more people that may one day rob them/rape them/burn their offices down?