Page 1 of 1

Poor Clintons

Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2016 8:57 pm
by HI54UNI
The Clintons are so poor that Hillary's campaign is paying her a salary of $250,000 a year. :wtf:



What is up with Hillary Clinton’s compulsive lining of her own pockets?

It turns out she has her campaign paying her $250,000 a year. It’s not illegal — but most would-be presidents aren’t so venal.

And she truly doesn’t need the cash: Her net worth is $11 million to $52 million.

http://nypost.com/2016/03/06/the-loving ... cy-reagan/

Re: Poor Clintons

Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2016 9:39 pm
by Chizzang
HI54UNI wrote:The Clintons are so poor that Hillary's campaign is paying her a salary of $250,000 a year. :wtf:



What is up with Hillary Clinton’s compulsive lining of her own pockets?

It turns out she has her campaign paying her $250,000 a year. It’s not illegal — but most would-be presidents aren’t so venal.

And she truly doesn’t need the cash: Her net worth is $11 million to $52 million.

http://nypost.com/2016/03/06/the-loving ... cy-reagan/
Um...
You might want to examine Ben Carson's campaign
with the same enthusiasm and vigor

:coffee:

as well as Rubio using campaign funds to pay his personal debt in 2006...
It obviously won;t surprise anybody that Clinton is a shady operator
but sadly just the slightest digging into all of them turns out they're all slime

Re: Poor Clintons

Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:08 am
by kalm
Meanwhile...

Image

Re: Poor Clintons

Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:32 am
by CAA Flagship
Never too old for a cow-hummer:

Image

Re: Poor Clintons

Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:31 am
by GOD
Why only 250k?

Re: Poor Clintons

Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 1:36 pm
by houndawg
GOD wrote:Why only 250k?
per speech. :coffee:

Re: Poor Clintons

Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 1:59 pm
by GrizFanStuckInUtah
CAA Flagship wrote:Never too old for a cow-hummer:

Image

The guy in the back is thinking..........."I've had sex with 2 out of those 3 and Bernie isn't one of them."