Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

(CNN)Attention Target shoppers: Say goodbye to "girls' building sets" and "boys' bedding."

The big box retailer announced Friday that it will start phasing out gender-based signage in some departments. The shift comes in response to customer feedback that distinguishing between products for girls and boys is unnecessary and maybe even harmful.

Parents and gender equality advocates welcomed the news as a significant step with potential to inspire other retailers.

"This change is a step towards removing gender limitations in childhood, but when one of the world's largest retailers does this, the ripple effect will be significant," author Melissa Atkins Wardy said in her blog, Pigtail Pals & Ballcap Buddies, which promotes gender-neutral toys, apparel and other products for children.

"This change will play a role in shifting the way kids see themselves as consumers and will help to shift the way adults see the role of gender in childhood," said Wardy, author of "Redefining Girly: How Parents Can Fight the Stereotyping and Sexualizing of Girlhood, from Birth to Tween."

Historically, Target used signs to help customers find products faster, the company said in a statement on its website. In some cases it makes sense, like with apparel, where fit and sizing differences between the sexes come into play, the statement said.

"But shopping preferences and needs change and, as guests have pointed out, in some departments like toys, home or entertainment, suggesting products by gender is unnecessary," the company said.

"We heard you, and we agree."

The changes will come over the next few months, the company said. Signs in the kids' bedding area will no longer feature suggestions for boys or girls. In the toys aisles, references to gender, including the use of pink, blue, yellow or green paper on the walls of shelves, also will be removed.

Barbie is getting more real

A small minority of commenters criticized Target in the online statement for giving into pressure to promote "politically correct fads" and "homogenize the genders."

Far more people applauded the decision.

"Thank you! I'm so tired of my daughter trying to play with her best friend (a boy) and him not wanting to because whatever she has is a girl toy. Or not wanting to watch the show she suggested because it's a girls' show," one commenter said. "Eliminating these gender typed divisions will help kids learn a toy is a toy, a show is a show, fun is fun."

Ohio mother Abi Bechtel was one of many Target shoppers in recent months to publicly criticize the store for marketing products based on gender. A picture she tweeted in June was widely shared, sparking debate over who's to blame for gendered toys -- toymakers or consumers.

Bechtel applauded Target for listening to consumers who agreed that "color-coded" marketing is "regressive and harmful."

"Kids pick up cues about what society thinks of gender from so many places, and I'm glad that the Target toy aisle is no longer going to be one of the places they're bombarded with ideas about what's appropriate for kids of any gender to play with," she said Saturday.

"I'm really pleased that so many people saw the potential for change and joined in asking for things to be better, and that Target listened."

AZGrizFan wrote:Seriously. WTF is wrong with this country?

AZGrizFan wrote:Seriously. WTF is wrong with this country?

AZGrizFan wrote:Seriously. WTF is wrong with this country?

JohnStOnge wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:Seriously. WTF is wrong with this country?

Liberalism. Or you may call it Progressivism.

The irony is tha. it's not progressive at all; unless you call progressing in the wrong direction "progressive."

Fighting "gender stereotypes" isn't going to make women more interested in being a CEO or a mechanical engineer or close the gender gap in math test scores no matter what liberal feminists say. If Target wants to placate these fools to improve their business that's fine with me. I'd be doing the same thing.

JohnStOnge wrote:

Fighting "gender stereotypes" isn't going to make women more interested in being a CEO or a mechanical engineer or close the gender gap in math test scores no matter what liberal feminists say. If Target wants to placate these fools to improve their business that's fine with me. I'd be doing the same thing.

That's all true but liberalism or progressivism or whatever you want to call it is still a big problem for this country. You wouldn't have people acting like those fools you refer to if it wasn't for liberalism or progressivism or whatever you want to call it. They're acting like fools because they've seen/heard/read the liberal/progressive bullshit on this issue. It's a friggin' sociological disease.

kalm wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:
That's all true but liberalism or progressivism or whatever you want to call it is still a big problem for this country. You wouldn't have people acting like those fools you refer to if it wasn't for liberalism or progressivism or whatever you want to call it. They're acting like fools because they've seen/heard/read the liberal/progressive bullshit on this issue. It's a friggin' sociological disease.

You should really try staying away from labels and stereotypes. I think this is ridiculous and most liberals/progressives I know would think the same. I make the same mistake in assuming all of conservatism is puritanical and wants to limit religious plurality...or porn and weed.

Pwns wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:
Liberalism. Or you may call it Progressivism.

The irony is tha. it's not progressive at all; unless you call progressing in the wrong direction "progressive."

You give too much credit to this.

Fighting "gender stereotypes" isn't going to make women more interested in being a CEO or a mechanical engineer or close the gender gap in math test scores no matter what liberal feminists say. If Target wants to placate these fools to improve their business that's fine with me. I'd be doing the same thing.

CAA Flagship wrote:

kalm wrote:
You should really try staying away from labels and stereotypes. I think this is ridiculous and most liberals/progressives I know would think the same. I make the same mistake in assuming all of conservatism is puritanical and wants to limit religious plurality...or porn and weed.

It is. Now go back to using labels and stereotypes. They are based in truth, they just don't apply to everyone.

kalm wrote: "all of conservatism is puritanical and wants to limit religious plurality...or porn and weed."