Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Have at it ladies!

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... d-20150708" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Actually, I'm pro-Taibbi on this one!

Ivytalk wrote:Actually, I'm pro-Taibbi on this one!

Yeah, I kind of figured a hit piece on Holder would be the one thing to bring you around.

Dear Eric Holder,

Thank you for not dropping the hammer on us after that little hiccup with the economy several years back. Here is your cushy 7-figure job that any medicore lawyer would be qualified to do.

Signed,

The MegaBanks.

This is what RS should stick to - opinion pieces.

They have trouble when they try to get into journalism - reporting on real things, etc

Pwns wrote:Dear Eric Holder,

Thank you for not dropping the hammer on us after that little hiccup with the economy several years back. Here is your cushy 7-figure job that any medicore lawyer would be qualified to do.

Signed,

The MegaBanks.

This ^ a thousand times ^ This
Why is it that every Obama appointment was completely on the take
Jeezus his appointment list reads like a criminal line-up

CID1990 wrote:This is what RS should stick to - opinion pieces.

They have trouble when they try to get into journalism - reporting on real things, etc

Journalism can't involve opinions?

The likes of Taibbi, Michael Hastings, William Greider, H.S Thompson, and Joe Klein have written journalistic pieces for RS for decades.

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:This is what RS should stick to - opinion pieces.

They have trouble when they try to get into journalism - reporting on real things, etc

Journalism can't involve opinions?

The likes of Taibbi, Michael Hastings, William Greider, H.S Thompson, and Joe Klein have written journalistic pieces for RS for decades.

What he means is "different opinions"
Just the facts as seen through a Republican lens is real journalism
everything else is hippie drivel

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:This is what RS should stick to - opinion pieces.

They have trouble when they try to get into journalism - reporting on real things, etc

Journalism can't involve opinions?

The likes of Taibbi, Michael Hastings, William Greider, H.S Thompson, and Joe Klein have written journalistic pieces for RS for decades.

No, journalism can't involve opinions. It should involve FACTS. Opinions are meant for editorials.

AZGrizFan wrote:

kalm wrote:
Journalism can't involve opinions?

The likes of Taibbi, Michael Hastings, William Greider, H.S Thompson, and Joe Klein have written journalistic pieces for RS for decades.

No, journalism can't involve opinions. It should involve FACTS. Opinions are meant for editorials.

You have a narrow view of journalism.

Chizzang wrote:

kalm wrote:
Journalism can't involve opinions?

The likes of Taibbi, Michael Hastings, William Greider, H.S Thompson, and Joe Klein have written journalistic pieces for RS for decades.

What he means is "different opinions"
Just the facts as seen through a Republican lens is real journalism
everything else is hippie drivel

Well well well

look who I trolled up with a little sarcasm

not only Cleets, but Mr Contextual Nuance himself!

I liked the article - I was being sarcastic about RS's journalistic cred re: UVa, etc

of course journalism incorporates opinion

you two may unbunch your knickers now

CID1990 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
What he means is "different opinions"
Just the facts as seen through a Republican lens is real journalism
everything else is hippie drivel

Well well well

look who I trolled up with a little sarcasm

not only Cleets, but Mr Contextual Nuance himself!

I liked the article - I was being sarcastic about RS's journalistic cred re: UVa, etc

of course journalism incorporates opinion

you two may unbunch your knickers now

I got a little secret for you
I didn't read the article - I was just trolling

Chizzang wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Well well well

look who I trolled up with a little sarcasm

not only Cleets, but Mr Contextual Nuance himself!

I liked the article - I was being sarcastic about RS's journalistic cred re: UVa, etc

of course journalism incorporates opinion

you two may unbunch your knickers now

I got a little secret for you
I didn't read the article - I was just trolling

Here's some more red meat for Klam, et al from that bastion of journalistic relevance:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... s-20150713" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

FLASH! AFL/CIO destroys Scott Walker with one tweet!

It wasn't quite a "he's a big doo doo head" tweet, but damn close.

But to the nobel laureates at Rolling Stone, it was a putdown of Shakespearean proportions!



edit: check out the comments section for a good time

CID1990 wrote:Here's some more red meat for Klam, et al from that bastion of journalistic relevance:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... s-20150713" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

FLASH! AFL/CIO destroys Scott Walker with one tweet!

It wasn't quite a "he's a big doo doo head" tweet, but damn close.

But to the nobel laureates at Rolling Stone, it was a putdown of Shakespearean proportions!



edit: check out the comments section for a good time

Simon needs a Prozac, but I bet his article on his favorite Grateful Dead song was epic!

CID1990 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
What he means is "different opinions"
Just the facts as seen through a Republican lens is real journalism
everything else is hippie drivel

Well well well

look who I trolled up with a little sarcasm

not only Cleets, but Mr Contextual Nuance himself!

I liked the article - I was being sarcastic about RS's journalistic cred re: UVa, etc

of course journalism incorporates opinion

you two may unbunch your knickers now

You dirty rotten son of a bitch!