Page 1 of 1

After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd wife

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 9:29 am
by BDKJMU
That didn't take long.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 61612.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 9:51 am
by houndawg
BDKJMU wrote:That didn't take long.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 61612.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
A second wife? What could possibly go wrong?

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 10:10 am
by 93henfan
Expect incestual marriage suits in WV and human-animal marriage suits in Alabama.

Who are we to judge or discriminate?

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 10:41 am
by Grizalltheway
93henfan wrote:Expect incestual marriage suits in WV and human-animal marriage suits in Alabama.

Who are we to judge or discriminate?
I'm actually relieved it's this instead of someone trying to marry their favorite sheep.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 11:57 am
by ALPHAGRIZ1
93henfan wrote:Expect incestual marriage suits in WV and human-animal marriage suits in Alabama.

Who are we to judge or discriminate?
Agreed, if D1B wants to screw a horse who is anyone to tell him he cant?

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:26 pm
by kalm
It's weird, but I fail to see the harm to anyone else.

Btw, isn't this ok'd by the bible?

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 7:09 pm
by andy7171
kalm wrote:It's weird, but I fail to see the harm to anyone else.

Btw, isn't this ok'd by the bible?
The fuck?

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:14 am
by houndawg
kalm wrote:It's weird, but I fail to see the harm to anyone else.

Btw, isn't this ok'd by the bible?
If you're dumb enough to want two wives, go ahead, it serves you right...

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:22 am
by kalm
andy7171 wrote:
kalm wrote:It's weird, but I fail to see the harm to anyone else.

Btw, isn't this ok'd by the bible?
The fuck?
WFP?

(which fucking point?)

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:57 am
by Chizzang
Moses had a few wives...
and startling percentage of Christians think he built the ark - so you've got that going for you


:rofl:

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:48 pm
by kalm
Chizzang wrote:Moses had a few wives...
and startling percentage of Christians think he built the ark - so you've got that going for you


:rofl:
Soloman had 700 wives and 300 hookers.

Wasn't he supposedly the smartest man alive?

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2015 5:38 pm
by CAA Flagship
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
93henfan wrote:Expect incestual marriage suits in WV and human-animal marriage suits in Alabama.

Who are we to judge or discriminate?
Agreed, if D1B wants to screw a horse who is anyone to tell him he cant?
#HorsesLivesMatter

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2015 7:15 pm
by SeattleGriz
kalm wrote:
Chizzang wrote:Moses had a few wives...
and startling percentage of Christians think he built the ark - so you've got that going for you


:rofl:
Soloman had 700 wives and 300 hookers.

Wasn't he supposedly the smartest man alive?
Exactly! :bananahump:

Re: After SSM ruling MT man to court for right to marry 2nd

Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:11 pm
by Jjoey52
Actually there is already an incest case in NY.