FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=43382
That's why you should watch Fox News and read the WSJ, Andy.andy7171 wrote:Sad but true.
But you know they're both right.kalm wrote:That's why you should watch Fox News and read the WSJ, Andy.andy7171 wrote:Sad but true.
Just like you read Daily Kos and watch MSNBC.kalm wrote:That's why you should watch Fox News and read the WSJ, Andy.andy7171 wrote:Sad but true.
I've never read Daily Kos. I assume it's the liberal version of the WSJ?CitadelGrad wrote:Just like you read Daily Kos and watch MSNBC.kalm wrote:
That's why you should watch Fox News and read the WSJ, Andy.
Why would you lump the WSJ in with Fox News?
I've never read Daily Kos (Does that upset you?) I assume it's the liberal version of the WSJ?CitadelGrad wrote:Just like you read Daily Kos and watch MSNBC.kalm wrote:
That's why you should watch Fox News and read the WSJ, Andy.
Why would you lump the WSJ in with Fox News?
Edit 1kalm wrote:I've never read Daily Kos. I assume it's the liberal version of the WSJ?CitadelGrad wrote:
Just like you read Daily Kos and watch MSNBC.
Why would you lump the WSJ in with Fox News?
I do watch Morning Joe from time to time though. Right after I check out Rollimg Stone of course.
Edit 2kalm wrote:I've never read Daily Kos (Does that upset you?) I assume it's the liberal version of the WSJ?CitadelGrad wrote:
Just like you read Daily Kos and watch MSNBC.
Why would you lump the WSJ in with Fox News?
I do watch Morning Joe from time to time though. Right after I check out Rollimg Stone of course.
CID1990 wrote:Edit 2kalm wrote:
I've never read Daily Kos (Does that upset you?) I assume it's the liberal version of the WSJ?
I do watch Morning Joe from time to time though. Right after I check out Rollimg Stone of course.
The first one wasn't snarky enough?
BTW you might want to use "edit" instead of "quote"
kalm wrote:CID1990 wrote:
Edit 2
The first one wasn't snarky enough?
BTW you might want to use "edit" instead of "quote"
I brought my C game last night.
BDKJMU wrote:AP news photo yesterday..
Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..
He must have been pretty smart to get that gig.andy7171 wrote:I've watched Morning Joe on occasion, but only because I dated the executive producer in HS. I'm at work when thats on.
Come to think of it...it is kind of a bitchy whiny post...even for BDK.houndawg wrote:BDKJMU wrote:AP news photo yesterday..
Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..
Shame on his crew for not removing that to being with. I worked on a few campaigns and it was common to remove everything from the walls b/c all it takes is an image of your candidate with something like that or some out of context word to become a meme and a distraction.BDKJMU wrote:AP news photo yesterday..
Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..
He must be experiencing that "not so fresh" feeling this week.kalm wrote:Come to think of it...it is kind of a bitchy whiny post...even for BDK.houndawg wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:AP news photo yesterday..
Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..
True...but the photo is taken from a rather strange angle (normally frontal, not side)dbackjon wrote:BDKJMU wrote:AP news photo yesterday..
Now if the reverse had been done and the AP had done a photo with a gun pointed at Obama's head or Hillary's head the left would have gone bonkers..
JFC.
You mamby-pampy Conservatives look for offense anywhere.
Dumbshit Cruz was giving a speech in a ROOM with all the walls covered in gun pics.
If the press hadn't taken pictures, you'd be pissing and moaning about liberal bias.
Grow a pair.
I saw a picture of the room (can't find it right now) and there were posters of guns EVERYWHERE in the room - most any angle would get the same result.Col Hogan wrote:True...but the photo is taken from a rather strange angle (normally frontal, not side)dbackjon wrote:
JFC.
You mamby-pampy Conservatives look for offense anywhere.
Dumbshit Cruz was giving a speech in a ROOM with all the walls covered in gun pics.
If the press hadn't taken pictures, you'd be pissing and moaning about liberal bias.
Grow a pair.
And the photographer had to line it up just right to get the picture...
Then, among the 17 - 20 pictures submitted by the photographer, the photo editor had to pick just that one to use...
Nah, no bias there...
Take a picture from the normal angle (front) and get the same outcome...dbackjon wrote:I saw a picture of the room (can't find it right now) and there were posters of guns EVERYWHERE in the room - most any angle would get the same result.Col Hogan wrote:
True...but the photo is taken from a rather strange angle (normally frontal, not side)
And the photographer had to line it up just right to get the picture...
Then, among the 17 - 20 pictures submitted by the photographer, the photo editor had to pick just that one to use...
Nah, no bias there...
As Ibanez said - bad planning on Cruz's campaign.
Col Hogan wrote:Take a picture from the normal angle (front) and get the same outcome...dbackjon wrote:
I saw a picture of the room (can't find it right now) and there were posters of guns EVERYWHERE in the room - most any angle would get the same result.
As Ibanez said - bad planning on Cruz's campaign.
I'll wait over here while you come up with another reason to justify this...