The unfair process for college sexual assault allegations
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 6:49 pm
I've been hearing reports on the particular case described at https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/ ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; but I did not know the situation is as bad as it is until I read that article.
This crap of throwing all principles pertaining to the rights of the accused out the window when women accuse men of rape or sexual assault has got to stop.The lawsuit is also likely to further fuel an ongoing debate about the tough new standards on sexual assault adopted by colleges and universities under federal government pressure, standards that many legal scholars believe violate the rights of those accused of sexual misconduct.
Under the standard ordered by the US Department of Education, Doe was judged guilty under a “preponderance of the evidence,’’ meaning the three-member disciplinary board — made up of officials from neighboring colleges — found it more likely than not that the allegation was true, said the letter to Doe expelling him. In the past, Amherst and other colleges had used a tougher standard of proof — clear and convincing evidence of guilt.