Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Officially declare seeking office.


Right now we have seven:

Ben Carson, former Director of Pediatric Neurosurgery for Johns Hopkins Hospital[
Ted Cruz, U.S. Senator from Texas since 2013
Carly Fiorina, former Hewlett-Packard CEO 1999–2005
Mike Huckabee, Governor of Arkansas 1996–2007
Rand Paul, U.S. Senator from Kentucky since 2011
Marco Rubio, U.S. Senator from Florida since 2011
Rick Santorum, U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania 1995–2007

I hope Fiorina gets cancer and aids.

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:I hope Fiorina gets cancer and aids.

So much crazy. Why waste time on this mindset?

How many homosexuals will run for POTUS?

Ivytalk wrote:How many homosexuals will run for POTUS?

Well if statistical anomalies are removed for accuracy 35% of the Republicans running will be Homosexual
100% of the Anti-Gay republicans will be Homosexual
and 9% of the democrats

Meanwhile, the party of inclusion and ideas will be running essentially just one

Lindsey Graham is running. And Gov. Pataki is supposed to run as well.

CID1990 wrote:Meanwhile, the party of inclusion and ideas will be running essentially just one

And with CID's illumination, Dback becomes the Colonel Sanders of political irony...

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=em_N3PqMfsc[/youtube]

CID1990 wrote:Meanwhile, the party of inclusion and ideas will be running essentially just one

Who is to the right of Huckabee on social spending, to the right of Paul on foreign policy, and has a larger cock than Graham.

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:Meanwhile, the party of inclusion and ideas will be running essentially just one

Who is to the right of Huckabee on social spending, to the right of Paul on foreign policy, and has a larger cock than Graham.

That's some vicious shyt right there!

Ivytalk wrote:How many homosexuals will run for POTUS?

Well since 50% of Republican politicians are closet cases.......I'd say at least 7 or 8.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWTzcOgKTLo#t=73[/youtube]

Up to NINE now

dbackjon wrote:Up to NINE now

well I voted 20+, so I'm lookin good right now...

mainejeff wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:How many homosexuals will run for POTUS?

Well since 50% of Republican politicians are closet cases.......I'd say at least 7 or 8.

And you'll blow all of them.

dbackjon wrote:Up to NINE now

Hey jon-

The candidate you are going to vote for- she only recently "evolved" on gay marriage

Up until that point, she was a HATER zomg lol!!!

I remember her saying something like marriage bei G between a man and a woman as something as AGELESS AS the THREADS OF TIME or something like that

You may laugh at the number of candidates the GOP is putting out there, but that's a much better sign of political health than the coronation going on for the candidate you're going to vote for.

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:Meanwhile, the party of inclusion and ideas will be running essentially just one

Who is to the right of Huckabee on social spending, to the right of Paul on foreign policy, and has a larger cock than Graham.

Graham's a cracker, so a candidate of color should have a larger cock.

Cluck U wrote:

kalm wrote:
Who is to the right of Huckabee on social spending, to the right of Paul on foreign policy, and has a larger cock than Graham.

Graham's a cracker, so a candidate of color should have a larger cock.

Rick Perry makes 10

CID1990 wrote:

dbackjon wrote:Up to NINE now

Hey jon-

The candidate you are going to vote for- she only recently "evolved" on gay marriage

Up until that point, she was a HATER zomg lol!!!

I remember her saying something like marriage bei G between a man and a woman as something as AGELESS AS the THREADS OF TIME or something like that

You may laugh at the number of candidates the GOP is putting out there, but that's a much better sign of political health than the coronation going on for the candidate you're going to vote for.

At least she evolved. Unlike all of the GOP field.

No - it is a sign that the GOP is a cluster right now.

this is no different than the 1988 Primaries - basically a coronation for GHW Bush, while every Democrat that every held an office ran for President.

Geez Jon, Obama was against gay marriage and for only civil unions when you voted for him the first time. He knew he needed the votes in '12, so he flipped.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... -marriage/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ASUG8 wrote:Geez Jon, Obama was against gay marriage and for only civil unions when you voted for him the first time. He knew he needed the votes in '12, so he flipped.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... -marriage/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I know - he was better than McCain, but there were areas I was not happy about him.

I was banned from Democratic Underground for two years (along with other LGBT posters) for criticizing Obama on gay rights.

dbackjon wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Hey jon-

The candidate you are going to vote for- she only recently "evolved" on gay marriage

Up until that point, she was a HATER zomg lol!!!

I remember her saying something like marriage bei G between a man and a woman as something as AGELESS AS the THREADS OF TIME or something like that

You may laugh at the number of candidates the GOP is putting out there, but that's a much better sign of political health than the coronation going on for the candidate you're going to vote for.

At least she evolved. Unlike all of the GOP field.

No - it is a sign that the GOP is a cluster right now.

this is no different than the 1988 Primaries - basically a coronation for GHW Bush, while every Democrat that every held an office ran for President.

lol

at least she evolved

if a republican said they had evolved you and the rest of the ready for hillary cheer squad would be ripping them for being disingenuous

youre a robot, jon. the meat and potatoes of any political party

dbackjon wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Hey jon-

The candidate you are going to vote for- she only recently "evolved" on gay marriage

Up until that point, she was a HATER zomg lol!!!

I remember her saying something like marriage bei G between a man and a woman as something as AGELESS AS the THREADS OF TIME or something like that

You may laugh at the number of candidates the GOP is putting out there, but that's a much better sign of political health than the coronation going on for the candidate you're going to vote for.

At least she evolved. Unlike all of the GOP field.

No - it is a sign that the GOP is a cluster right now.

this is no different than the 1988 Primaries - basically a coronation for GHW Bush, while every Democrat that every held an office ran for President.

I always find it odd when partisans of one party try to say another party is in disarray or "a cluster". I certainly won't argue that the GOP lacks a real good frontrunner for the Presidential nomination - of course they lack one - but the GOP as a party is hardly in disarray. The Presidential race isn't about party, it rarely is - it's mostly about the persons running for the office. If people end up picking Clinton over Bush, it will be because they like her more (or hate her less) than the other candidate. Not because she's a Democrat and he's a Republican. Where race does have more of an impact, the GOP is doing pretty well despite most people questioning whether it can still be considered a national party: control of the House, control of the Senate, and control of 31 of 50 state governorships.

The GOP doesn't have a headliner, while the Dems still have one in Clinton (but no one really after her). That's the Presidential race.

dbackjon wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Hey jon-

The candidate you are going to vote for- she only recently "evolved" on gay marriage

Up until that point, she was a HATER zomg lol!!!

I remember her saying something like marriage bei G between a man and a woman as something as AGELESS AS the THREADS OF TIME or something like that

You may laugh at the number of candidates the GOP is putting out there, but that's a much better sign of political health than the coronation going on for the candidate you're going to vote for.

At least she evolved. Unlike all of the GOP field.

No - it is a sign that the GOP is a cluster right now.

this is no different than the 1988 Primaries - basically a coronation for GHW Bush, while every Democrat that every held an office ran for President.

Yeah, she's evolved alright. But only because she knows she needs those votes. And those voters are one-issue voters...