Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Ted Cruz is yesterday's nuz.

The Libertarian that just proposed adding 200 billion to the defense budget.

Paul is the most promising candidate.

Board Progtards will sheeple after Clinton.

travelinman67 wrote:Paul is the most promising candidate.

Board Progtards will sheeple after Clinton.

I can see dback going for Clinton, but not kalm, WTAG or hounder.

Ibanez wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:Paul is the most promising candidate.

Board Progtards will sheeple after Clinton.

I can see dback going for Clinton, but not kalm, WTAG or hounder.

I might pull a 93 and abstain this time around, but if not, I'm writing in Jeff Bridges.

Ibanez wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:Paul is the most promising candidate.

Board Progtards will sheeple after Clinton.

I can see dback going for Clinton, but not kalm, WTAG or hounder.

I'd vote for Paul over Clinton any day. I'm still leaning Gary Johnson though.

Looks like tman was wrong.

Ibanez wrote:Looks like tman was wrong.

In other news, the sun came up this morning.

Grizalltheway wrote:

Ibanez wrote:Looks like tman was wrong.

In other news, the sun came up this morning.

It's his opinion, and he's entitled to it. But, it just goes to show that you can't expect what someone will do just b/c they are conservative or liberal. I'm more liberal than conservative and i'd vote Paul over Clinton.


And kalm, I voted for Gary.

Grizalltheway wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
I can see dback going for Clinton, but not kalm, WTAG or hounder.

I might pull a 93 and abstain this time around, but if not, I'm writing in Jeff Bridges.

Hasn't he played a president on TV?

If so he's as qualified as the current field, including the current president when he was running in 2008

Ibanez wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
In other news, the sun came up this morning.

It's his opinion, and he's entitled to it. But, it just goes to show that you can't expect what someone will do just b/c they are conservative or liberal. I'm more liberal than conservative and i'd vote Paul over Clinton.


And kalm, I voted for Gary.

As did I, and probably will again if he runs.

clearly you people haven't been paying attention to anything I've said...

(and that butt hurts me deeply)

Jill Stein

Chizzang wrote:clearly you people haven't been paying attention to anything I've said...

(and that butt hurts me deeply)

Jill Stein

It's not worth standing in line to waste a vote on her. Nothing personal against you or her, it's just that Americans haven't gotten pissed off enough about a two party system yet for these independents and moderates to be taken seriously for much of anything above a handful of congressmen. I wish that wasn't the case, but sadly it's the US we live in at present.

You should take on the mantle of educating the masses about the benefits of not automatically pulling the left or right lever and using some thought in the voting booth on different issues. We might actually start seeing the US begin regaining some worldwide ground if we can get people to be more centrist and less divisive.

ASUG8 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:clearly you people haven't been paying attention to anything I've said...

(and that butt hurts me deeply)

Jill Stein

It's not worth standing in line to waste a vote on her. Nothing personal against you or her, it's just that Americans haven't gotten pissed off enough about a two party system yet for these independents and moderates to be taken seriously for much of anything above a handful of congressmen. I wish that wasn't the case, but sadly it's the US we live in at present.

You should take on the mantle of educating the masses about the benefits of not automatically pulling the left or right lever and using some thought in the voting booth on different issues. We might actually start seeing the US begin regaining some worldwide ground if we can get people to be more centrist and less divisive.

Um... I would have used "The Sarcasm Font" on my post but

Ibanez wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:Paul is the most promising candidate.

Board Progtards will sheeple after Clinton.

I can see dback going for Clinton, but not kalm, WTAG or hounder.

Its Willie Nelson for the rest of my voting days.

travelinman67 wrote:Paul is the most promising candidate.

Board Progtards will sheeple after Clinton.

Hard to disagree when the the other choice so far is Ted Cruz, the Canadian-born latino who moved to Texas and re-invented himself as a white supremacist.

Paul and his daddy are both too creepy to get it done.

travelinman67 wrote: Board Progtards will sheeple after Clinton.

Seriously dude...
You do have at least a vague introduction to psych 101 right?
That statement you make above says more about YOU than anybody else



You've become a living parody of spitefulness in action

http://news.yahoo.com/watch-live--rand- ... 08798.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Grizalltheway wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
I can see dback going for Clinton, but not kalm, WTAG or hounder.

I might pull a 93 and abstain this time around, but if not, I'm writing in Jeff Bridges.

The dude abides.

houndawg wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
I can see dback going for Clinton, but not kalm, WTAG or hounder.

Its Willie Nelson for the rest of my voting days.

Well this'll probably be the last election he'll be around for (assuming he makes it to THIS one)....so ya'll gonna just write in a dead man for the rest of your days?

houndawg wrote: Paul and his daddy are both too creepy to get it done.

Rand ain't Ron. Ron is crazy. Rand has his shit together.

Contrast Rand to Queen Hillary...

...SHE'S BAT SHIT SOCIOPATHIC.

AZGrizFan wrote:

houndawg wrote:
Its Willie Nelson for the rest of my voting days.

Well this'll probably be the last election he'll be around for (assuming he makes it to THIS one)....so ya'll gonna just write in a dead man for the rest of your days?

Yeah. He could still do a better job.

travelinman67 wrote:

houndawg wrote: Paul and his daddy are both too creepy to get it done.

Rand ain't Ron. Ron is crazy. Rand has his shit together.

Contrast Rand to Queen Hillary...

...SHE'S BAT SHIT SOCIOPATHIC.

LOL - Rand is every bit as sociopathic and crazy as his old man.



And that is President Hillary to you.


And you know you would do her.

dbackjon wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:
Rand ain't Ron. Ron is crazy. Rand has his **** together.

Contrast Rand to Queen Hillary...

...SHE'S BAT **** SOCIOPATHIC.

LOL - Rand is every bit as sociopathic and crazy as his old man.



And that is President Hillary to you.


And you know you would do her.

She'd sit on his face while he chokes the pope.

Of all the possibilities being discussed at this time Rand Paul is the one I'd most like to see become President. I don't think it'll happen. I think him ending up as President is very unlikely. But if I had my pick among those that are being talked about right now he'd be it.