Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Pwns wrote:Rachel Carson? Margaret Sanger? At least choose Marie Curie and not a eugenicist and envirowhacko who played a role in the DDT ban.

And whe we're talking about presidential misdoings, can we take Licoln off the 5 for his extreme ineptness that caused 600,000 deaths?

Pwns wrote:Rachel Carson? Margaret Sanger? At least choose Marie Curie and not a eugenicist and envirowhacko who played a role in the DDT ban.

And whe we're talking about presidential misdoings, can we take Licoln off the 5 for his extreme ineptness that caused 600,000 deaths?

kalm wrote:

Pwns wrote:Rachel Carson? Margaret Sanger? At least choose Marie Curie and not a eugenicist and envirowhacko who played a role in the DDT ban.

And whe we're talking about presidential misdoings, can we take Licoln off the 5 for his extreme ineptness that caused 600,000 deaths?

What's wrong with Rachel Carson? What's right with DDT?

I'm not saying she's currency material.

Then again, I can't honestly come up with one woman who is.

kalm wrote:

Pwns wrote:Rachel Carson? Margaret Sanger? At least choose Marie Curie and not a eugenicist and envirowhacko who played a role in the DDT ban.

And whe we're talking about presidential misdoings, can we take Licoln off the 5 for his extreme ineptness that caused 600,000 deaths?

What's wrong with Rachel Carson? What's right with DDT?

I'm not saying she's currency material.

Then again, I can't honestly come up with one woman who is.

Cluck U wrote:

kalm wrote:
What's wrong with Rachel Carson? What's right with DDT?

I'm not saying she's currency material.

Then again, I can't honestly come up with one woman who is.

You're supposed to say, as all of us are, "my wife."

No BJ for you tonight.

kalm wrote:

Cluck U wrote:
You're supposed to say, as all of us are, "my wife."

No BJ for you tonight.

We'll I throw bills at the wifey. Does that count?

kalm wrote:

Pwns wrote:Rachel Carson? Margaret Sanger? At least choose Marie Curie and not a eugenicist and envirowhacko who played a role in the DDT ban.

And whe we're talking about presidential misdoings, can we take Licoln off the 5 for his extreme ineptness that caused 600,000 deaths?

What's wrong with Rachel Carson? What's right with DDT?

I'm not saying she's currency material.

Then again, I can't honestly come up with one woman who is.

kalm wrote:
What's wrong with Rachel Carson? What's right with DDT?

I'm not saying she's currency material.

Then again, I can't honestly come up with one woman who is.

travelinman67 wrote:Camille Paglia...

Pwns wrote:

kalm wrote:
What's wrong with Rachel Carson? What's right with DDT?

I'm not saying she's currency material.

Then again, I can't honestly come up with one woman who is.

The National Academy of Sciences has estimated that DDT saved half a billion lives…and since it has been banned malaria has made a big comeback.

But hey, Carson and Sanger may have delayed the Malthusian collapse 50 years, amiright?

kalm wrote:

Pwns wrote:
The National Academy of Sciences has estimated that DDT saved half a billion lives…and since it has been banned malaria has made a big comeback.

But hey, Carson and Sanger may have delayed the Malthusian collapse 50 years, amiright?

But what about the swans???

Link?

Pwns wrote:

kalm wrote:
But what about the swans???

Link?

http://dwb.unl.edu/Teacher/NSF/C06/C06L ... s/ddt.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The citation is from reference #8.

Consumer advocate Ralph Nader once said of ACSH, "A consumer group is an organization which advocates the interests of unrepresented consumers and must either maintain its own intellectual independence or be directly accountable to its membership. In contrast, ACSH is a consumer front organization for its business backers. It has seized the language and style of the existing consumer organizations, but its real purpose, you might say, is to glove the hand that feeds it."[2]

Pwns wrote:Do you dispute the NAS citation says what that ASCH paper says it does? I don't have a free link to a NAS publication from 1970.

Even when that paper is chock full of references from scientific and medical papers you still want to use the strawman of "industry front-group"?

kalm wrote:

Pwns wrote:Do you dispute the NAS citation says what that ASCH paper says it does? I don't have a free link to a NAS publication from 1970.

Even when that paper is chock full of references from scientific and medical papers you still want to use the strawman of "industry front-group"?

Google NAS and DDT.

Pwns wrote:

kalm wrote:
Google NAS and DDT.

And? No one will dispute that malaria drastically decreased when DDT came into use and it drastically increased again when its use stopped. NAS may not have been a proponent of DDT back in the 1970s, but that was before a lot of the evidence came out that it wasn't as bad as the environmentalists of the time claimed it was.

Pwns wrote:

kalm wrote:
What's wrong with Rachel Carson? What's right with DDT?

I'm not saying she's currency material.

Then again, I can't honestly come up with one woman who is.

The National Academy of Sciences has estimated that DDT saved half a billion lives…and since it has been banned malaria has made a big comeback.

But hey, Carson and Sanger may have delayed the Malthusian collapse 50 years, amiright?

Pwns wrote:Rachel Carson? Margaret Sanger? At least choose Marie Curie and not a eugenicist and envirowhacko who played a role in the DDT ban.

And whe we're talking about presidential misdoings, can we take Licoln off the 5 for his extreme ineptness that caused 600,000 deaths?

∞∞∞ wrote:To be honest, I'd like to simply get rid of paper currency and just go digital. But that's for another discussion.

As for this, I agree that some of the women they suggest have contributed more to the US (and humanity) than President Jackson did. And I really can't think of a good argument why we shouldn't have a women on a prominent bill. Either way, it's not the biggest deal in the world.