Page 1 of 2

SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 6:28 pm
by JohnStOnge
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Gee what a surprise. Of course we ALL believe that the US Justice Department under Eric Holder is COMPLETELY unbiased when it comes to stuff like this.

As those who are familiar with me know, I am not a cop cheerleader. But WHY even act like this is news? We know we have a total hack as Attorney General. We know the Justice Department is extremely biased in the Al Sharpton direction right now. Why act like the DOJ reaching this conclusion is news? Is there ANYBODY who thought it was going to turn out any other way?

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 6:55 pm
by YoUDeeMan
The numbers in Fergusson probably indicate that people over 70 years old are arrested in a percentage that is far less than their representative population.

That must mean that old people are obviously getting preferential treatment by the police.

Oh, and I heard that an older person sent a couple of e-mails that joked about younger people. The whole town obviously needs to be reconditioned to believe that septagenarians are just as much of a threat for violence as those in the 15-30 age bracket...and that those old folks, and their closed minded jokes, are a detriment to society.

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 6:58 pm
by kalm
I've posted this before but it's a worthy reminder...

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... y-lie.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 7:38 pm
by travelinman67
Mullah Obama should convict the Ferguson members of crimes against Allah's followers...

...and sentence them all to death by beheading.

:thumb:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 7:48 pm
by Chizzang
Sweet Bald Headed Baby Jeezus look at the reaction here...
Talk about your community circle jerk

:shock:

If you boys need some more lube I hear O'Reilly is doing a piece on this tonight

:coffee:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 7:57 pm
by houndawg
JohnStOnge wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html

Gee what a surprise. Of course we ALL believe that the US Justice Department under Eric Holder is COMPLETELY unbiased when it comes to stuff like this.

As those who are familiar with me know, I am not a cop cheerleader. But WHY even act like this is news? We know we have a total hack as Attorney General. We know the Justice Department is extremely biased in the Al Sharpton direction right now. Why act like the DOJ reaching this conclusion is news? Is there ANYBODY who thought it was going to turn out any other way?
I'm beginning to think that your drama-queen act is the real you..... I really am. :shock:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:09 pm
by houndawg
kalm wrote:I've posted this before but it's a worthy reminder...

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... y-lie.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:tothehand:

Those cops are heros who lay their lives on the line every day for ungrateful bleeding-heart libtards. Next time you get in trouble call a hippie. Let him show up after the fact and fill out the paperwork... :ohno: :ohno:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 9:19 pm
by DSUrocks07
Didnt the same DOJ under Holder not file "civil rights" charges in the whole trayvon martin thing?

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 5:55 am
by houndawg
DSUrocks07 wrote:Didnt the same DOJ under Holder not file "civil rights" charges in the whole trayvon martin thing?

White-devil slave masters at the DOJ.... :coffee:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:11 am
by CAA Flagship
Chizzang wrote:Sweet Bald Headed Baby Jeezus look at the reaction here...
Talk about your community circle jerk

:shock:

If you boys need some more lube I hear O'Reilly is doing a piece on this tonight

:coffee:
Thanks for your thoughts. :thumb:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 12:32 pm
by Skjellyfetti
Image

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post ... on-police/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 12:51 pm
by GannonFan
Skjellyfetti wrote:Image

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post ... on-police/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Agreed, in this day and age e-mails and stuff like that is just completely unacceptable, as is the lack of any action taken to address those things. If the Ferguson Police Department was actively doing things to root out and eliminate crap like that, I could take a softer view on the raw statistics (which are often overplayed anyway). However, their house was clearly not in order so they do stand to have it cleaned for them.

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 1:12 pm
by houndawg
JohnStOnge wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html

Gee what a surprise. Of course we ALL believe that the US Justice Department under Eric Holder is COMPLETELY unbiased when it comes to stuff like this.

As those who are familiar with me know, I am not a cop cheerleader. But WHY even act like this is news? We know we have a total hack as Attorney General. We know the Justice Department is extremely biased in the Al Sharpton direction right now. Why act like the DOJ reaching this conclusion is news? Is there ANYBODY who thought it was going to turn out any other way?
Chickenshit mutt cop fired from his last gig for brutality shoots unarmed teen ager, city's largest revenue stream is 2.5 million annually from shakedown citations and "court fees", black residents average 3 warrants per household for shakedown tickets they can't pay..... you know how them darkies overreact John... of course down in your neck of the woods I imagine they know their place a little better...

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 3:51 pm
by CID1990
Its funny...

DoJ yesterday releases the report on how the Ferguson PD is racist as hell

then today releases the real report - the one that fully justifies the shooting

I wish I had been a fly on the wall in Holder's office when his deputies delivered that gem to him

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 4:55 pm
by mrklean
Skjellyfetti wrote:Image

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post ... on-police/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Why is anyone surprised at this? This is what they are and you have seen what they do. But Fox News repukes want to paint the Ferguson Police Department as victims. :coffee: Another lie, just like the, "all black people attend college for free".......... :rofl:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:07 pm
by JohnStOnge
Wow. Seven off color emails over three years of e mails among, according to a Google search I just did, around 70 employees. That CERTAINLY shows that the Department in general was treating Blacks unfairly (sarcasm intended).

With respect to all the Stats on percentage stops, arrests, etc: As I have posted before, statistics on race of offender perceived by victims consistently suggest that Blacks are more likely to engage in activities that result in police action, prosecution, etc.

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:10 pm
by JohnStOnge
On MSNBC they just reported that every single case of someone being bitten by a police dog involved an "African American" being the one bitten. So we now know that police dogs are also racists who are unfair to Black people.

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:21 pm
by Skjellyfetti
Your posts referencing listening to talk radio or watching cable news are becoming more frequent. Explains quite a lot, really.

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:31 pm
by YoUDeeMan
Seven (7) e-mails in three years...and they call the department racist. :suspicious:

You have to be kidding me. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

And, as CID points out...the DOJ announces they can't pin anything on the police officer who shot the Brown clown. Even said the witnesses who said Brown was holding his hands up were not reliable.

kkklean's mother is still saying Brown was an angel. :dunce: :tothehand:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:40 pm
by Skjellyfetti
Cluck U wrote:Seven (7) e-mails in three years...and they call the department racist. :suspicious:

You have to be kidding me. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Those were the highlighted ones. There were many more. :roll:

And, if you want a more thorough summary of the overall report:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post ... on-report/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:46 pm
by kalm
Cluck U wrote:Seven (7) e-mails in three years...and they call the department racist. :suspicious:

You have to be kidding me. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

And, as CID points out...the DOJ announces they can't pin anything on the police officer who shot the Brown clown. Even said the witnesses who said Brown was holding his hands up were not reliable.

kkklean's mother is still saying Brown was an angel. :dunce: :tothehand:
Newsflash: Police tend to be racist. :shock:

Even the rural ones in all white jurisdictions. :shock: :shock:

I have an in-law who is a damn fine cop and good all-around dude in a rural country which, if it has more than a dozen black residents, I'd be surprised. But he and his cohorts tend a little toward the racist side. So much so that my SiL and BiL found it necessary to give one of his daughters a black barbie for christmas one year. :mrgreen:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:53 pm
by YoUDeeMan
Skjellyfetti wrote:
Cluck U wrote:Seven (7) e-mails in three years...and they call the department racist. :suspicious:

You have to be kidding me. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Those were the highlighted ones. There were many more. :roll:

And, if you want a more thorough summary of the overall report:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post ... on-report/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Your link doesn't provide any other e-mails. But, following your link it reveals that one person has been fired for e-mails, and two others are being investigated.

So, again, three people over three years send a few e-mails...yet the department is racist? I bet I can find three racist bicyclers...I guess all of you are racist. :nod: :thumb:

Maybe a graph would help your argument. How many septuagenarians have been arrested? Do those numbers reflect the make up of the community? If not, why aren't you screaming and posting about that? :suspicious:

This "racist" report was simply a nugget thrown out to cover up the DOJ's finding that they could not find the officer guilty. :ohno:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:55 pm
by YoUDeeMan
kalm wrote:
Cluck U wrote:Seven (7) e-mails in three years...and they call the department racist. :suspicious:

You have to be kidding me. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

And, as CID points out...the DOJ announces they can't pin anything on the police officer who shot the Brown clown. Even said the witnesses who said Brown was holding his hands up were not reliable.

kkklean's mother is still saying Brown was an angel. :dunce: :tothehand:
Newsflash: Police tend to be racist. :shock:

Even the rural ones in all white jurisdictions. :shock: :shock:

I have an in-law who is a damn fine cop and good all-around dude in a rural country which, if it has more than a dozen black residents, I'd be surprised. But he and his cohorts tend a little toward the racist side. So much so that my SiL and BiL found it necessary to give one of his daughters a black barbie for christmas one year. :mrgreen:
Newsflash, inner city people tend to be racist.

Make sure your Sil and Bil missionaries send the NAACP a white barbie for Christmas...you know, since they want to make a point. :nod: :thumb:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:59 pm
by kalm
Cluck U wrote:
kalm wrote:
Newsflash: Police tend to be racist. :shock:

Even the rural ones in all white jurisdictions. :shock: :shock:

I have an in-law who is a damn fine cop and good all-around dude in a rural country which, if it has more than a dozen black residents, I'd be surprised. But he and his cohorts tend a little toward the racist side. So much so that my SiL and BiL found it necessary to give one of his daughters a black barbie for christmas one year. :mrgreen:
Newsflash, inner city people tend to be racist.

Make sure your Sil and Bil missionaries send the NAACP a white barbie for Christmas...you know, since they want to make a point. :nod: :thumb:
:lol:

Re: SHOCKER: DOJ Rags on Ferguson Police Department

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 9:27 pm
by BDKJMU
kalm wrote:
Cluck U wrote:Seven (7) e-mails in three years...and they call the department racist. :suspicious:

You have to be kidding me. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

And, as CID points out...the DOJ announces they can't pin anything on the police officer who shot the Brown clown. Even said the witnesses who said Brown was holding his hands up were not reliable.

kkklean's mother is still saying Brown was an angel. :dunce: :tothehand:
Newsflash: Police tend to be racist. :shock:

Even the rural ones in all white jurisdictions. :shock: :shock:

I have an in-law who is a damn fine cop and good all-around dude in a rural country which, if it has more than a dozen black residents, I'd be surprised. But he and his cohorts tend a little toward the racist side. So much so that my SiL and BiL found it necessary to give one of his daughters a black barbie for christmas one year. :mrgreen:
So he's a Canadian cop?