Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://www.southernminn.com/ap/state/ar ... acf6e.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;




EAGAN, Minn. (AP) — A 15-year-old boy unintentionally fatally shot his 13-year-old brother while playing "cops and robbers" after the boys discovered their father's hidden gun at a Minnesota home, police said Monday.
Police and paramedics responded to an Eagan home Sunday morning after the 15-year-old reported his brother was unresponsive and bleeding.

The 15-year-old told dispatchers his brother had fallen and stabbed himself while running with a knife. But when police arrived, the older boy told officers he had accidentally shot his brother.

Police said they do not anticipate any arrests in the case.

The boys were home alone with their 11-year-old sister when they found an unloaded 9 mm pistol belonging to their father. A magazine with cartridges for the gun was nearby, police said.

At some point, the firearm was loaded, then thought to be unloaded while the boys chased each other as they played "cops and robbers," investigators said.

Police said the 15-year-old fired one round that struck his brother in the chest. The 13-year-old died at the scene. The 11-year-old sister did not witness the shooting and was not hurt, police said.

While police said the shooting "appears to be a horrible accident," the results of their investigation will be presented to the Dakota County Attorney's Office for review.




"Grizzaholic!!!"

Was the kids Dad in the NRA?

If not then why are you trying to link people that were not in the house to this idiot playing with guns when he wasnt supposed to? Once again the left knows NOTHING about the NRA and what it teaches so we have to pick up the pieces.

MANDATORY gun safety classes in all public schools should be instituted ASAP, we have to think of the children since the left just wants them dead. (Sandyhook, Columbine, etc)

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Was the kids Dad in the NRA?

If not then why are you trying to link people that were not in the house to this idiot playing with guns when he wasnt supposed to? Once again the left knows NOTHING about the NRA and what it teaches so we have to pick up the pieces.

MANDATORY gun safety classes in all public schools should be instituted ASAP, we have to think of the children since the left just wants them dead. (Sandyhook, Columbine, etc)

Go NRA!!!! For facilitating and promoting a gun culture and creating the illusion that one needs loaded firearms in the home to ward off the niqqers and the Mexicans....and Democrats!!!!

GO NRA!!!!!

The blood is on your hands, keeping the poor uneducated american children killing themselves and putting them in positions to be mass slaughtered in gun free zones.

YEA anti gun legislation that doesnt work!!!!

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:The blood is on your hands, keeping the poor uneducated american children killing themselves and putting them in positions to be mass slaughtered in gun free zones.

YEA anti gun legislation that doesnt work!!!!

And guns which, unfortunately, DO work!

GO NRA!!!!!


"Wow, that doesn't LOOK like a porno DVD!"

Another FAILED Gun Free Zone!!!



Thanks for killing our high school friends Ms Feinstein, Pelosi and Reid!!!!

NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!!!! Its just another Chicago weekend


"Mom, the anti gun left let killers into our school again, can you come pick me up before the cops get here"?





"No your honor, there were no signs saying I couldnt have a gun in that theater so I figured hey, I hate Batman".

Wait, so the father won't be charged with anything? He's the real azzhole in the case. If you want to own a gun, be responsible enough with it that shat like this never happens. This guy shouldn't own firearms.....

bluehenbillk wrote:Wait, so the father won't be charged with anything? He's the real azzhole in the case. If you want to own a gun, be responsible enough with it that shat like this never happens. This guy shouldn't own firearms.....

Back up there a minute, he shouldnt have kids.......I mean kid

Agree that Dad is the one ultimately responsible. A 15 year old boy should have been taught how to safely handle a gun and how to properly shot it already.

Ignoring education on the safe handling and use of fire arms is irresponsible. Agree that this training should be available to all. Its ironic to me that those who most often advocate for education, don't include practical education, such as gun safety.

The whole idea of hiding from guns, gun safety and marksman courses is turning over control to anyone who either controls government or ignores the rule of law.

Liberty and risk are associated. If you don't want any risk, give up all your Liberty to government in the hope that it can protect you from everything including yourself. That's if that's what you want.

JohnStOnge wrote:Liberty and risk are associated. If you don't want any risk, give up all your Liberty to government in the hope that it can protect you from everything including yourself. That's if that's what you want.

Yup.

JohnStOnge wrote:Liberty and risk are associated. If you don't want any risk, give up all your Liberty to government in the hope that it can protect you from everything including yourself. That's if that's what you want.

You forgot to mention negligence or gross negligence which is what the father was guilty of here.

JohnStOnge wrote:Liberty and risk are associated. If you don't want any risk, give up all your Liberty to government in the hope that it can protect you from everything including yourself. That's if that's what you want.

+100

JohnStOnge wrote:Liberty and risk are associated. If you don't want any risk, give up all your Liberty to government in the hope that it can protect you from everything including yourself. That's if that's what you want.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Benjamin Franklin

CID1990 wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:Liberty and risk are associated. If you don't want any risk, give up all your Liberty to government in the hope that it can protect you from everything including yourself. That's if that's what you want.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Benjamin Franklin

CID1990 wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:Liberty and risk are associated. If you don't want any risk, give up all your Liberty to government in the hope that it can protect you from everything including yourself. That's if that's what you want.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Benjamin Franklin

"Im too drunk to taste this chicken. "

Col. Sanders

Ibanez wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Benjamin Franklin

"Im too drunk to taste this chicken. "

Col. Sanders

Quit stealing my shtick, nerd.

Ibanez wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Benjamin Franklin

"Im too drunk to taste this chicken. "

Col. Sanders

Vanilla Ice did it.