Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

While the US Government was suing Microsoft for monopoly behavior
It was creating and fostering precisely just that in Broadband

This article:
Why is American Internet so slow and Expensive..?
http://theweek.com/articles/449919/amer ... ernet-slow" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Right regulation protects the freedom of the market.

kalm wrote:Right regulation protects the freedom of the market.

We're sadly in the position now where only Google can save us...
I near trillion dollar colossus is all that's left that can fight the Federal Government and Comcast

Sad times

Lobby Money has successfully defeated the Free Market

Chizzang wrote:

kalm wrote:Right regulation protects the freedom of the market.

We're sadly in the position now where only Google can save us...
I near trillion dollar colossus is all that's left that can fight the Federal Government and Comcast

Sad times

Lobby Money has successfully defeated the Free Market

To both parties including a big fat chunk to Obama's reelection. But nah...money is speech and like Ganny says, they just have better ideas.

Chizzang wrote:

kalm wrote:Right regulation protects the freedom of the market.

We're sadly in the position now where only Google can save us...
I near trillion dollar colossus is all that's left that can fight the Federal Government and Comcast

Sad times

Lobby Money has successfully defeated the Free Market

If true we are screwed.

kalm wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
We're sadly in the position now where only Google can save us...
I near trillion dollar colossus is all that's left that can fight the Federal Government and Comcast

Sad times

Lobby Money has successfully defeated the Free Market

To both parties including a big fat chunk to Obama's reelection. But nah...money is speech and like Ganny says, they just have better ideas.

I love how after 2-3 posts of you two long stroking each other with no takers, klam has to resort to calling people out by name to try to put the defib paddles to the thread

CID1990 wrote:

kalm wrote:
To both parties including a big fat chunk to Obama's reelection. But nah...money is speech and like Ganny says, they just have better ideas.

I love how after 2-3 posts of you two long stroking each other with no takers, klam has to resort to calling people out by name to try to put the defib paddles to the thread

I called out Ganny because he puts up a good fight regarding election financing versus you who has nothing to contribute other snide hypocritical remarks.

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
I love how after 2-3 posts of you two long stroking each other with no takers, klam has to resort to calling people out by name to try to put the defib paddles to the thread

I called out Ganny because he puts up a good fight regarding election financing versus you who has nothing to contribute other snide hypocritical remarks.

Gosh, do you think Google, and all the Google users, can collect more money than Comcast?

If so, then they should easily be able to voice their opinions, purchase their own lobbyists, and influence their elected officials...and thus the laws.

If not, then why not?

Gotta love Estonia. Skype was invented there.

kalm wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
I love how after 2-3 posts of you two long stroking each other with no takers, klam has to resort to calling people out by name to try to put the defib paddles to the thread

I called out Ganny because he puts up a good fight regarding election financing versus you who has nothing to contribute other snide hypocritical remarks.

No, Ganny gets suckered into arguments with 5 year olds.

Snide, (ostensibly hypocritical) remarks are how you deal with juvenile arguments, and I use the term arguments loosely.

CID1990 wrote:

kalm wrote:
I called out Ganny because he puts up a good fight regarding election financing versus you who has nothing to contribute other snide hypocritical remarks.

No, Ganny gets suckered into arguments with 5 year olds.

Snide, (ostensibly hypocritical) remarks are how you deal with juvenile arguments, and I use the term arguments loosely.

Bullshit.

CID1990 wrote:

kalm wrote:
I called out Ganny because he puts up a good fight regarding election financing versus you who has nothing to contribute other snide hypocritical remarks.

No, Ganny gets suckered into arguments with 5 year olds.

Snide, (ostensibly hypocritical) remarks are how you deal with juvenile arguments, and I use the term arguments loosely.

I was just yelling at a kid the other day when I was dropping my kids off at elementary school. Little bugger had a tea party sticker on his back pack. I told him he's probably never even had a decent tea in his life and was still just drinking milk. Kids today.