Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

CAA Flagship wrote:Link contains video of police being shot in street and attackers leaving in car.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2 ... rlie-hebdo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

So when does freedom of speech cross the "hate" line?

Grizalltheway wrote:#Frenchlivesmatter

LeadBolt wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote:Link contains video of police being shot in street and attackers leaving in car.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2 ... rlie-hebdo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

So when does freedom of speech cross the "hate" line?

Obviously it comes into play when the perpetrator is white and the recipient is not.

Grizalltheway wrote:#Frenchlivesmatter

Pwns wrote:The obvious solution here is more gun control and regulation of hate speech.

kalm wrote:

Pwns wrote:The obvious solution here is more gun control and regulation of hate speech.

Who's calling for regulation of hate speech?

ASUG8 wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:#Frenchlivesmatter

#handsupI'mfrench

Ibanez wrote:That's horrible. I'd consider this an act of terror. I've always found these radicals to be hypocrites, among other things. They are such, horrible, vile people.

Charlie Hebdo, the satirical French magazine that was the target of a deadly attack today, is part of a long tradition of French satire dating to the days before the French Revolution.

The left-wing magazine is known for its biting takedowns. Its past targets include the political right wing, capitalism, Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

It most recently came to the world's attention when it published cartoons of Islam's Prophet Muhammad soon after the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that killed Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya. Initially, it was thought that an anti-Islam film had fanned the violence. The magazine, in its cartoons, referred to that film. At the time, editor Stephane Charbonnier said the cartoons would "shock those who want to be shocked."

Many Muslims consider the depiction of their prophet to be blasphemous.

A year earlier, Charlie Hebdo's offices were firebombed after it published an issue that invited the Prophet Muhammad to be guest editor; the issue included an article about what a soft version of Sharia might look like. The magazine was renamed Charia Hebdo for the issue, and its cover included an image of the prophet with the line, "A thousand lashes if you don't die laughing."

The magazine was also part of the controversy over the publication in 2005 by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten of cartoons depicting Islam's prophet. The newspaper said the decision to publish the 12 editorial cartoons would contribute to the debate over Islam and free speech. The move resulted in violent protests worldwide and threats against Jyllands-Posten. In solidarity, Charlie Hebdo reprinted the 12 cartoons in 2006. Its headline for the feature was "Muhammad Overwhelmed By Fundamentalists."

CAA Flagship wrote:The left-wing magazine

andy7171 wrote:Great idea, police without weapons. Cap'n Cat's dream.

93henfan wrote:It's pretty obvious to me. Muslims don't like cartoons.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

andy7171 wrote:Great idea, police without weapons. Cap'n Cat's dream.

Again, dumbest motherfucker on this board. You and SuperHornet.

travelinman67 wrote:

93henfan wrote:It's pretty obvious to me. Muslims don't like cartoons.

It cannot withstand critical analysis.

Rather than defend their ideology, they declare challengers to be blasphemors who must be destroyed.

The trademark of an unsound doctrine.





Kinda like shouting "consensus" and villifying scientific debate....

CAA Flagship wrote: So when does freedom of speech cross the "hate" line?