Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Scientific analysis of readability finds Obama's speeches most "dumbed down" of all Presidents.

https://www.vocativ.com/interactive/usa ... adability/

Kinda thinkin' he's just speaking to his supporters.

Dumb... AND Dishonest...

[youtube]http://youtube/watch?v=DZSigyG-BZU[/youtube]

Everybody is playing for second place in the dumb speech category.


Is our children being educated....

Why do we keep arguing this point? It plays right into Spandos' two party-same shit argument.

Yes, the last two presidents we elected were, if not the two dumbest, both clearly in the bottom ten.

I guess I have to give Bush credit for at least not having so much hubris that he couldn't laugh at himself. Obama really believes that his shit doesn't stink, and his fat baboon-looking wife has an even higher opinion of herself.

93henfan wrote:Why do we keep arguing this point? It plays right into Spandos' two party-same shit argument.

Yes, the last two presidents we elected were, if not the two dumbest, both clearly in the bottom ten.

I guess I have to give Bush credit for at least not having so much hubris that he couldn't laugh at himself. Obama really believes that his shit doesn't stink, and his fat baboon-looking wife has an even higher opinion of herself.

Simple. Libtard insistence that Bush was "dumbest".

Bush was dumb. Obama is dumber.

If our nation continues on its current path, we have not yet elected the dumbest.

Personally, I'm aghast that anyone still attempts to defend the failed policies of the current administration. Ideologue or not, the time and energy wasted defending failed policies to protect party vanity is destroying our nation.

travelinman67 wrote:

93henfan wrote:Why do we keep arguing this point? It plays right into Spandos' two party-same shit argument.

Yes, the last two presidents we elected were, if not the two dumbest, both clearly in the bottom ten.

I guess I have to give Bush credit for at least not having so much hubris that he couldn't laugh at himself. Obama really believes that his shit doesn't stink, and his fat baboon-looking wife has an even higher opinion of herself.

Simple. Libtard insistence that Bush was "dumbest".

Bush was dumb. Obama is dumber.

If our nation continues on its current path, we have not yet elected the dumbest.

Personally, I'm aghast that anyone still attempts to defend the failed policies of the current administration. Ideologue or not, the time and energy wasted defending failed policies to protect party vanity is destroying our nation.

+1

Take reaganomics for example...

kalm wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:
Simple. Libtard insistence that Bush was "dumbest".

Bush was dumb. Obama is dumber.

If our nation continues on its current path, we have not yet elected the dumbest.

Personally, I'm aghast that anyone still attempts to defend the failed policies of the current administration. Ideologue or not, the time and energy wasted defending failed policies to protect party vanity is destroying our nation.

+1

Take reaganomics for example...

ouch... that sting a little teabag?

travelinman67 wrote:

93henfan wrote:Why do we keep arguing this point? It plays right into Spandos' two party-same **** argument.

Yes, the last two presidents we elected were, if not the two dumbest, both clearly in the bottom ten.

I guess I have to give Bush credit for at least not having so much hubris that he couldn't laugh at himself. Obama really believes that his **** doesn't stink, and his fat baboon-looking wife has an even higher opinion of herself.

Simple. Libtard insistence that Bush was "dumbest".

Bush was dumb. Obama is dumber.

If our nation continues on its current path, we have not yet elected the dumbest.

Personally, I'm aghast that anyone still attempts to defend the failed policies of the current administration. Ideologue or not, the time and energy wasted defending failed policies to protect party vanity is destroying our nation.

technicality, I know, but the dumbest wasn't elected, he was appointed by the Supreme Court.

houndawg wrote: Everybody is playing for second place in the dumb speech category.


Is our children being educated....

I've been to all 57 states...

BDKJMU wrote:

houndawg wrote: Everybody is playing for second place in the dumb speech category.


Is our children being educated....

I've been to all 57 states...

A good candidate for second. Doesn't touch "is our children being educated", too much irony.

Bush's post 9/11 speech was one of the best I ever heard, but he sucked as a Prez. Clearly speech quality is not a good metric with which to judge a Prez.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4libw-PhPZ8[/youtube]


[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlKIfzoC8D0[/youtube]

-
George Bush had higher grades at Harvard

Ideologues drop in, without having reviewed the research, and blindly defend failed policies.

Point

Made

Thank You

travelinman67 wrote:Ideologues drop in, without having reviewed the research, and blindly defend failed policies.

Point

Made

Thank You

What?

kalm wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:Ideologues drop in, without having reviewed the research, and blindly defend failed policies.

Point

Made

Thank You

What?

Kalm, you, densedawg, nobrains86, just don't get it.

BlueHen86 wrote:

BDKJMU wrote:
I've been to all 57 states...

A good candidate for second. Doesn't touch "is our children being educated", too much irony.

The fact that Obama said :"Corpsman" not once, but twice, certainly does touch that..

Bronco wrote:-
George Bush had higher grades at Harvard

And another ideologue waltzes in...

travelinman67 wrote:

kalm wrote:
What?

Kalm, you, densedawg, nobrains86, just don't get it.

C'mon...you can at least TRY and look less obvious.

I don't see any surprises that Obama's speeches are aimed at the lowest common denominator..?
This is the era of buzz words and 30 second video clips

Why would ANY politician aim higher..? Any complex idea expressed and you'll just get misquoted

I would speak in very short phrases (much like I print on this forum)

travelinman67 wrote:Scientific analysis of readability finds Obama's speeches most "dumbed down" of all Presidents.

https://www.vocativ.com/interactive/usa ... adability/

Kinda thinkin' he's just speaking to his supporters.

SMFH……

Sad to watch. An increasingly hateful and bitter Tbag, backed into a corner by the triumph of Progressivism over Conkunism, simply proves to us that one can find ANYTHING on the Internet if he or she simply types in keywords.

Shame, T. Get on that couch soon and talk to Brother D about your shit.

The speech to the 1st graders should have been our first clue as to what was to come.

Bronco wrote:The speech to the 1st graders should have been our first clue as to what was to come.

You mean getting out of the ConkWars and cleaning up W's economic mess?

I see your point, then, Bronchitis.

Tbag, old, bitter quitter full of hatred for gods children. Anti Christian as they come. An embarrassment to humanity.