Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/op ... crime.html

Holy f****

Didn't read the article.

But, pedophilia isn't a crime unless you act on it...

Skjellyfetti wrote:Didn't read the article.

But, pedophilia isn't a crime unless you act on it...

This is true.

Thinking about something and doing something are two very different things.


I'd bet every single one of us would be locked in solitary the rest of our lives - if not executed instantly - for 98% of the thoughts that run through our head.

clenz wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Didn't read the article.

But, pedophilia isn't a crime unless you act on it...

This is true.

Thinking about something and doing something are two very different things.


I'd bet every single one of us would be locked in solitary the rest of our lives - if not executed instantly - for 98% of the thoughts that run through our head.

You scare me..













.

Spoiler: show

clenz wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Didn't read the article.

But, pedophilia isn't a crime unless you act on it...

This is true.

Thinking about something and doing something are two very different things.


I'd bet every single one of us would be locked in solitary the rest of our lives - if not executed instantly - for 98% of the thoughts that run through our head.

So very true. I don't approve of pedophilia (Btw, I can't wait to read JSOs dissertation on this) but just having those thoughts isn't criminal.

Now, if someone goes around touching little girls then yes, it's a crime.

Ibanez wrote:

clenz wrote: This is true.

Thinking about something and doing something are two very different things.


I'd bet every single one of us would be locked in solitary the rest of our lives - if not executed instantly - for 98% of the thoughts that run through our head.

So very true. I don't approve of pedophilia (Btw, I can't wait to read JSOs dissertation on this) but just having those thoughts isn't criminal.

Now, if someone goes around touching little girls then yes, it's a crime.

And if they go around and touch little boys, it is called priesthood.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Didn't read the article.

But, pedophilia isn't a crime unless you act on it...

You don't say.

kalm wrote:

clenz wrote: This is true.

Thinking about something and doing something are two very different things.


I'd bet every single one of us would be locked in solitary the rest of our lives - if not executed instantly - for 98% of the thoughts that run through our head.

You scare me..













.

Spoiler: show

I know you're full of white, middle class, hetero guilt....but...let's not act like you don't have thoughts that would put you in jail if you acted on them.

Cluck U wrote:

Ibanez wrote: So very true. I don't approve of pedophilia (Btw, I can't wait to read JSOs dissertation on this) but just having those thoughts isn't criminal.

Now, if someone goes around touching little girls then yes, it's a crime.

And if they go around and touch little boys, it is called priesthood.

That goes without saying.

clenz wrote:

kalm wrote:
You scare me..













.

Spoiler: show

I know you're full of white, middle class, hetero guilt....but...let's not act like you don't have thoughts that would put you in jail if you acted on them.

98% of them? No.

kalm wrote:

clenz wrote: I know you're full of white, middle class, hetero guilt....but...let's not act like you don't have thoughts that would put you in jail if you acted on them.

98% of them? No.

This. Most of mine would just get my ass beat by someone's father/husband/S.O.

Grizalltheway wrote:

kalm wrote:
98% of them? No.

This. Most of mine would just get my ass beat by someone's father/husband/S.O.

For you, it would be death by Tomahawk missile.

CAA Flagship wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
This. Most of mine would just get my ass beat by someone's father/husband/S.O.

For you, it would be death by Tomahawk missile.

T-thanks?

Ibanez wrote:

clenz wrote: This is true.

Thinking about something and doing something are two very different things.


I'd bet every single one of us would be locked in solitary the rest of our lives - if not executed instantly - for 98% of the thoughts that run through our head.

So very true. I don't approve of pedophilia (Btw, I can't wait to read JSOs dissertation on this) but just having those thoughts isn't criminal.

Now, if someone goes around touching little girls then yes, it's a crime.

So, sexual attraction to prepubescent children is no different than depression or bipolar disorder?

Got it!

HEY!!! JSO!!!

YOU WERE RIGHT!!!

AGAIN!!!

Guess it depends on WHO'S selling it.

travelinman67 wrote:

Ibanez wrote: So very true. I don't approve of pedophilia (Btw, I can't wait to read JSOs dissertation on this) but just having those thoughts isn't criminal.

Now, if someone goes around touching little girls then yes, it's a crime.

So, sexual attraction to prepubescent children is no different than depression or bipolar disorder?

Got it!

HEY!!! JSO!!!

YOU WERE RIGHT!!!

AGAIN!!!

Guess it depends on WHO'S selling it.

It's a problem, but if you don't act on it there isn't a crime. Do you see the difference?

Thinking about killing your wife isn't the same thing as murder.

Ibanez wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:
So, sexual attraction to prepubescent children is no different than depression or bipolar disorder?

Got it!

HEY!!! JSO!!!

YOU WERE RIGHT!!!

AGAIN!!!

Guess it depends on WHO'S selling it.

It's a problem, but if you don't act on it there isn't a crime. Do you see the difference?

Thinking about killing your wife isn't the same thing as murder.

Thinkin' about smackin' a bitch isn't the same thing as actually smackin' the bitch, even if she deserves it.

bandl wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
It's a problem, but if you don't act on it there isn't a crime. Do you see the difference?

Thinking about killing your wife isn't the same thing as murder.

Thinkin' about smackin' a bitch isn't the same thing as actually smackin' the bitch, even if she deserves it.

The Thirst is strong in this one.

Man, T. You are just fucking stoopid.

Ibanez wrote:

bandl wrote: Thinkin' about smackin' a bitch isn't the same thing as actually smackin' the bitch, even if she deserves it.

The Thirst is strong in this one.

THIRST is always capitalized, you twat monkey

The purpose of the article was to advocate protected class status for people diagnosed as pedophiles.

This would require businesses, schools, housing and govt. agencies to provide accomodations for the pedophiles in the same manner as a paraplegic war vet.

In all fairness, I would argue people who dream and obsess about violently raping women have a "disorder". Based upon the libtard response in this thread, the poor, disordered rape-dreamers should be allowed to loiter in shopping malls, park benches, bus stops, to glare at women and feed their disorder, so long as they don't act on it.
Find a weak cutey? Go ahead and follow her, imagining how great it would feel to sneak up behind her, choke her until she passes out. Quickly, you rip off her clothes, throw her on her back, then wait for her to awaken before you *********** ****** her while punching her face as she screams. Once you've finished, you wait for a moment before telling her you're HIV positive, then calmly walk away as she hysterically cries.

But, it's all good!!

It's just a fantasy and that woman you're staring at doesn't know what you're thinking. You then drive back to your protected class job, where you'll head home at the end of the day to your "set aside" apartment, with no women renters (too much of a temptation).



This is, apparently, what y'all are advocating.

travelinman67 wrote:The purpose of the article was to advocate protected class status for people diagnosed as pedophiles.

This would require businesses, schools, housing and govt. agencies to provide accomodations for the pedophiles in the same manner as a paraplegic war vet.

In all fairness, I would argue people who dream and obsess about violently raping women have a "disorder". Based upon the libtard response in this thread, the poor, disordered rape-dreamers should be allowed to loiter in shopping malls, park benches, bus stops, to glare at women and feed their disorder, so long as they don't act on it.
Find a weak cutey? Go ahead and follow her, imagining how great it would feel to sneak up behind her, choke her until she passes out. Quickly, you rip off her clothes, throw her on her back, then wait for her to awaken before you *********** ****** her while punching her face as she screams. Once you've finished, you wait for a moment before telling her you're HIV positive, then calmly walk away as she hysterically cries.

But, it's all good!!

It's just a fantasy and that woman you're staring at doesn't know what you're thinking. You then drive back to your protected class job, where you'll head home at the end of the day to your "set aside" apartment, with no women renters (too much of a temptation).



This is, apparently, what y'all are advocating.

So, you want to fire people with mental disorders? Just because they are messed up, but aren't breaking any laws. I thought you Republicans were against that sort of thing.

travelinman67 wrote:The purpose of the article was to advocate protected class status for people diagnosed as pedophiles.

This would require businesses, schools, housing and govt. agencies to provide accomodations for the pedophiles in the same manner as a paraplegic war vet.

In all fairness, I would argue people who dream and obsess about violently raping women have a "disorder". Based upon the libtard response in this thread, the poor, disordered rape-dreamers should be allowed to loiter in shopping malls, park benches, bus stops, to glare at women and feed their disorder, so long as they don't act on it.
Find a weak cutey? Go ahead and follow her, imagining how great it would feel to sneak up behind her, choke her until she passes out. Quickly, you rip off her clothes, throw her on her back, then wait for her to awaken before you *********** ****** her while punching her face as she screams. Once you've finished, you wait for a moment before telling her you're HIV positive, then calmly walk away as she hysterically cries.

But, it's all good!!

It's just a fantasy and that woman you're staring at doesn't know what you're thinking. You then drive back to your protected class job, where you'll head home at the end of the day to your "set aside" apartment, with no women renters (too much of a temptation).



This is, apparently, what y'all are advocating.

I'm not sure any poster is advocating any of that...........yet. All they said was that it is not a crime until acted on. I don't think anyone can debate that. It is fact. Nobody had offered any opinions on this issue yet so there is no need to accuse anyone here of anything. Sure their track record would lead you to believe that they think pedophiles deserve a hug and the Congressional Medal of Honor, but to be fair, not one poster has suggested that yet. It is just not right to accuse our perverted posters of anything at this time (Except bandl. He should be on a 24-hour watch. Oh, and GATW. He's a loaded pistol. Well, I guess you can add kalm as well. He is suffering from flag football wardrobe deficiencies.).

CAA Flagship wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:The purpose of the article was to advocate protected class status for people diagnosed as pedophiles.

This would require businesses, schools, housing and govt. agencies to provide accomodations for the pedophiles in the same manner as a paraplegic war vet.

In all fairness, I would argue people who dream and obsess about violently raping women have a "disorder". Based upon the libtard response in this thread, the poor, disordered rape-dreamers should be allowed to loiter in shopping malls, park benches, bus stops, to glare at women and feed their disorder, so long as they don't act on it.
Find a weak cutey? Go ahead and follow her, imagining how great it would feel to sneak up behind her, choke her until she passes out. Quickly, you rip off her clothes, throw her on her back, then wait for her to awaken before you *********** ****** her while punching her face as she screams. Once you've finished, you wait for a moment before telling her you're HIV positive, then calmly walk away as she hysterically cries.

But, it's all good!!

It's just a fantasy and that woman you're staring at doesn't know what you're thinking. You then drive back to your protected class job, where you'll head home at the end of the day to your "set aside" apartment, with no women renters (too much of a temptation).



This is, apparently, what y'all are advocating.

I'm not sure any poster is advocating any of that...........yet. All they said was that it is not a crime until acted on. I don't think anyone can debate that. It is fact. Nobody had offered any opinions on this issue yet so there is no need to accuse anyone here of anything. Sure their track record would lead you to believe that they think pedophiles deserve a hug and the Congressional Medal of Honor, but to be fair, not one poster has suggested that yet. It is just not right to accuse our perverted posters of anything at this time (Except bandl. He should be on a 24-hour watch. Oh, and GATW. He's a loaded pistol. Well, I guess you can add kalm as well. He is suffering from flag football wardrobe deficiencies.).

Don't worry about me. Tbag clearly put an unsettling amount of thought into this.

CAA Flagship wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:The purpose of the article was to advocate protected class status for people diagnosed as pedophiles.

This would require businesses, schools, housing and govt. agencies to provide accomodations for the pedophiles in the same manner as a paraplegic war vet.

In all fairness, I would argue people who dream and obsess about violently raping women have a "disorder". Based upon the libtard response in this thread, the poor, disordered rape-dreamers should be allowed to loiter in shopping malls, park benches, bus stops, to glare at women and feed their disorder, so long as they don't act on it.
Find a weak cutey? Go ahead and follow her, imagining how great it would feel to sneak up behind her, choke her until she passes out. Quickly, you rip off her clothes, throw her on her back, then wait for her to awaken before you *********** ****** her while punching her face as she screams. Once you've finished, you wait for a moment before telling her you're HIV positive, then calmly walk away as she hysterically cries.

But, it's all good!!

It's just a fantasy and that woman you're staring at doesn't know what you're thinking. You then drive back to your protected class job, where you'll head home at the end of the day to your "set aside" apartment, with no women renters (too much of a temptation).



This is, apparently, what y'all are advocating.

I'm not sure any poster is advocating any of that...........yet. All they said was that it is not a crime until acted on. I don't think anyone can debate that. It is fact. Nobody had offered any opinions on this issue yet so there is no need to accuse anyone here of anything. Sure their track record would lead you to believe that they think pedophiles deserve a hug and the Congressional Medal of Honor, but to be fair, not one poster has suggested that yet. It is just not right to accuse our perverted posters of anything at this time (Except bandl. He should be on a 24-hour watch. Oh, and GATW. He's a loaded pistol. Well, I guess you can add kalm as well. He is suffering from flag football wardrobe deficiencies.).

Exactly. T-man is making assumptions because people on here are rallying behind him.

CAA Flagship wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:The purpose of the article was to advocate protected class status for people diagnosed as pedophiles.

This would require businesses, schools, housing and govt. agencies to provide accomodations for the pedophiles in the same manner as a paraplegic war vet.

In all fairness, I would argue people who dream and obsess about violently raping women have a "disorder". Based upon the libtard response in this thread, the poor, disordered rape-dreamers should be allowed to loiter in shopping malls, park benches, bus stops, to glare at women and feed their disorder, so long as they don't act on it.
Find a weak cutey? Go ahead and follow her, imagining how great it would feel to sneak up behind her, choke her until she passes out. Quickly, you rip off her clothes, throw her on her back, then wait for her to awaken before you *********** ****** her while punching her face as she screams. Once you've finished, you wait for a moment before telling her you're HIV positive, then calmly walk away as she hysterically cries.

But, it's all good!!

It's just a fantasy and that woman you're staring at doesn't know what you're thinking. You then drive back to your protected class job, where you'll head home at the end of the day to your "set aside" apartment, with no women renters (too much of a temptation).



This is, apparently, what y'all are advocating.

I'm not sure any poster is advocating any of that...........yet. All they said was that it is not a crime until acted on. I don't think anyone can debate that. It is fact. Nobody had offered any opinions on this issue yet so there is no need to accuse anyone here of anything. Sure their track record would lead you to believe that they think pedophiles deserve a hug and the Congressional Medal of Honor, but to be fair, not one poster has suggested that yet. It is just not right to accuse our perverted posters of anything at this time (Except bandl. He should be on a 24-hour watch. Oh, and GATW. He's a loaded pistol. Well, I guess you can add kalm as well. He is suffering from flag football wardrobe deficiencies.).

Whoah, whoah whoah....how DARE you accuse me of thinking that much at this time of day!!! It is after 12, I am already drinking whiskey!!!