Page 1 of 1
Why the DOJ civil rights division should have no credibility
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 6:10 am
by Pwns
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorial ... htm?ref=mp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
As Hans von Spakovsky has documented in National Review Online, antics by Justice Department lawyers from the Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division included: leaking supposedly secret grand jury proceedings and conducting a PR campaign to influence the jury and inflame public opinion that included blogging on the website of the Times-Picayune newspaper.
The defendants justifiably petitioned for a new trial and on Nov. 26, 2012, in a scathing ruling unnoticed by the media, Louisiana Federal District Court Judge Kurt Englehardt reversed the convictions of the defendants, citing the "perfidy" and "skullduggery" of the Justice Department attorneys.
Does anyone think the circus Holder is overseeing in Missouri is about facts and justice?
Re: Why the DOJ civil rights division should have no credibi
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:57 pm
by BDKJMU
You mean the DOJ Get Whitey Division?
Re: Why the DOJ civil rights division should have no credibi
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 5:49 pm
by YoUDeeMan
Crickets.
Maybe SeattleDope can come in here and perform a miracle to get Libs to recognize their responsibility for this type of crap.
Re: Why the DOJ civil rights division should have no credibi
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 6:32 pm
by BDKJMU
Pwns wrote:http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorial ... htm?ref=mp
As Hans von Spakovsky has documented in National Review Online, antics by Justice Department lawyers from the Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division included: leaking supposedly secret grand jury proceedings and conducting a PR campaign to influence the jury and inflame public opinion that included blogging on the website of the Times-Picayune newspaper.
The defendants justifiably petitioned for a new trial and on Nov. 26, 2012, in a scathing ruling unnoticed by the media, Louisiana Federal District Court Judge Kurt Englehardt reversed the convictions of the defendants, citing the "perfidy" and "skullduggery" of the Justice Department attorneys.
Does anyone think the circus Holder is overseeing in Missouri is about facts and justice?
I could see similar happening in Ferguson. The DOJ using crooked tactics that leads a conviction on Wilson (no riots) that a year or 2 later gets overturned due to prosecutorial misconduct (some more protests, but likely no riots).