Page 1 of 1

Very, very wrong

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 5:25 pm
by JohnStOnge
My wife the realtor sent me this article:

http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-new ... e=RMODaily" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

What struck me about it is the idea that, in a country that was founded based on the idea of protecting Liberty, freedom of thought, etc., we actually have a law that possibly means that people cannot simply provide information on the demographics of an area to prospective home buyers.

I mean, that's really bad. It's one more clear indication that this country has completely lost touch with what it was supposed to be about.

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:18 pm
by CAA Flagship
Meh. Burn a gallon of gas to see if you see broken down cars in the front yard, pink flamingos, gnomes, Montana flags, or bandl's crews working in the neighborhood.

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:14 pm
by D1B
CAA Flagship wrote:Meh. Burn a gallon of gas to see if you see broken down cars in the front yard, pink flamingos, gnomes, Montana flags, or bandl's crews working in the neighborhood.
Or creepy old white fuck scoping neighborhood kids with binoculars and a McNeese State golf towel clipped to his fishing pants, piles of fish guts and a "CAUTION - DEAF CONK PLAYING" sign on the lawn.

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:38 pm
by Grizo406
D1B wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:Meh. Burn a gallon of gas to see if you see broken down cars in the front yard, pink flamingos, gnomes, Montana flags, or bandl's crews working in the neighborhood.
Or creepy old white fuck scoping neighborhood kids with binoculars and a McNeese State golf towel clipped to his fishing pants, piles of fish guts and a "CAUTION - DEAF CONK PLAYING" sign on the lawn.
Pretty good, D1B.

Not JoltinJoe good, but passably good.

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 4:35 am
by andy7171
D1B wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:Meh. Burn a gallon of gas to see if you see broken down cars in the front yard, pink flamingos, gnomes, Montana flags, or bandl's crews working in the neighborhood.
Or creepy old white fuck scoping neighborhood kids with binoculars and a McNeese State golf towel clipped to his fishing pants, piles of fish guts and a "CAUTION - DEAF CONK PLAYING" sign on the lawn.
Fantastic!

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:29 am
by Cap'n Cat
CAA Flagship wrote:Meh. Burn a gallon of gas to see if you see broken down cars in the front yard, pink flamingos, gnomes, Montana flags, or bandl's crews working in the neighborhood.

Agreed.

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:50 am
by CID1990
D1B wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:Meh. Burn a gallon of gas to see if you see broken down cars in the front yard, pink flamingos, gnomes, Montana flags, or bandl's crews working in the neighborhood.
Or creepy old white **** scoping neighborhood kids with binoculars and a McNeese State golf towel clipped to his fishing pants, piles of fish guts and a "CAUTION - DEAF CONK PLAYING" sign on the lawn.

:rofl: :notworthy:

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:57 am
by ALPHAGRIZ1
CAA Flagship wrote:Meh. Burn a gallon of gas to see if you see broken down cars in the front yard, pink flamingos, gnomes, Montana flags, or bandl's crews working in the neighborhood.

I take exception to this.

What do you have against pink flamingos muthafu*ker?

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 4:42 pm
by JohnStOnge
D1B wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:Meh. Burn a gallon of gas to see if you see broken down cars in the front yard, pink flamingos, gnomes, Montana flags, or bandl's crews working in the neighborhood.
Or creepy old white **** scoping neighborhood kids with binoculars and a McNeese State golf towel clipped to his fishing pants, piles of fish guts and a "CAUTION - DEAF CONK PLAYING" sign on the lawn.
You know, when I lived on St. Simons Island in an upstairs condo back in the day I used to look out of my condo window at girls in bikinis by the swimming pool with a telescope. I called it my "troloscope" to refer to looking at trollop. That was cool.

But once we moved to a house I didn't have that opportunity anymore. No worries. I just rode my bike to the beach and gawked close up.

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 4:57 pm
by dbackjon
If Realtors and Lenders hadn't redlined and put restrictive covenants into deeds in the first place, you wouldn't be in this position.

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:19 am
by Cap'n Cat
JohnStOnge wrote:
D1B wrote:
Or creepy old white **** scoping neighborhood kids with binoculars and a McNeese State golf towel clipped to his fishing pants, piles of fish guts and a "CAUTION - DEAF CONK PLAYING" sign on the lawn.
You know, when I lived on St. Simons Island in an upstairs condo back in the day I used to look out of my condo window at girls in bikinis by the swimming pool with a telescope. I called it my "troloscope" to refer to looking at trollop. That was cool.

But once we moved to a house I didn't have that opportunity anymore. No worries. I just rode my bike to the beach and gawked close up.

:shock:


St. Wronge's prey.........

Image

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 10:16 am
by Bronco
dbackjon wrote:If Realtors and Lenders hadn't redlined and put restrictive covenants into deeds in the first place, you wouldn't be in this position.

It would be a developer that would put Covenants on a property not any Realtors or Lenders

Redlining is illegal

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 10:22 am
by Cap'n Cat
Bronco wrote:
dbackjon wrote:If Realtors and Lenders hadn't redlined and put restrictive covenants into deeds in the first place, you wouldn't be in this position.

It would be a developer that would put Covenants on a property not any Realtors or Lenders

Redlining is illegal

Man I thought you died.

:roll:

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 10:41 am
by CID1990
Bronco wrote:
dbackjon wrote:If Realtors and Lenders hadn't redlined and put restrictive covenants into deeds in the first place, you wouldn't be in this position.

It would be a developer that would put Covenants on a property not any Realtors or Lenders

Redlining is illegal

screw you and the facts you rode in on

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 12:59 pm
by JohnStOnge
Cap'n Cat wrote:
St. Wronge's prey.........

Image
I was more on the lookout for this sort of thing:

Image

Young? Yes. But definitely at reproductive stage of development. Pretty much at peak reproductive stage I think.

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 1:52 pm
by CID1990
JohnStOnge wrote:
Cap'n Cat wrote:
St. Wronge's prey.........

Image
I was more on the lookout for this sort of thing:

Image

Young? Yes. But definitely at reproductive stage of development. Pretty much at peak reproductive stage I think.

What the fvck are you doing with my ex's picture motherfvcker

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:15 pm
by YoUDeeMan
Bronco wrote:
dbackjon wrote:If Realtors and Lenders hadn't redlined and put restrictive covenants into deeds in the first place, you wouldn't be in this position.

It would be a developer that would put Covenants on a property not any Realtors or Lenders

Redlining is illegal
Don't worry about Jon and facts...he's constantly pulling things right out of his ass.

Re: Very, very wrong

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 11:11 pm
by CID1990
Cluck U wrote:
Bronco wrote:

It would be a developer that would put Covenants on a property not any Realtors or Lenders

Redlining is illegal
Don't worry about Jon and facts...he's constantly pulling things right out of his ass.
as well as rodents, bottles, and a class ring or two