Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

NBC Miami: U.S. Captures Libyan Militant Accused in Benghazi Attack



Libyan protesters against Islamist militants in their country

Well. Now isn't THAT convenient. Pardon my cynicism.

DSUrocks07 wrote:
Libyan protesters against Islamist militants in their country

Say, isn't that in front of the Subway shop on Constitution Ave by the National Mall?

How soon until we find out that this guy has been under surveillance for the last 8 months and just now given the green light?

travelinman67 wrote:

DSUrocks07 wrote:
Libyan protesters against Islamist militants in their country

Say, isn't that in front of the Subway shop on Constitution Ave by the National Mall?

Being that there isn't a Subway on Constitution Ave, i'd say no. But please, what is your criticism?

andy7171 wrote:How soon until we find out that this guy has been under surveillance for the last 8 months and just now given the green light?

Andy, you know better than to ask questions such as this.

andy7171 wrote:How soon until we find out that this guy has been under surveillance for the last 8 months and just now given the green light?

The guy has given interviews to the NY Times, Reuters, and CNN, and has been living out in the open ever since the attack. We could have "captured" him any time we wanted. It's just politically convenient to "capture" him in a "raid" now.

Conks getting blown the fuck out, again.

Grizalltheway wrote:

Conks getting blown the fuck out, again.

No shit, there isn't a conk within an ocean of this.........conks just want the truth from the liars and con men on the left.

Baldy wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:

Conks getting blown the fuck out, again.

Look at the posts, Badly. Each one of you went full spandosretard.

I wasn't being very serious. Just something that could happen, given the track record.

Give the rat bastard an alleged trial, then hang him by his alleged balls after plucking out his alleged beard.

Ibanez wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:


Say, isn't that in front of the Subway shop on Constitution Ave by the National Mall?

Being that there isn't a Subway on Constitution Ave, i'd say no. But please, what is your criticism?

"Those damn Muslins hate all Americans, they don't care at all even when they do." #nuketheMiddleEast - Tman

Grizalltheway wrote:

Baldy wrote:

Look at the posts, Badly. Each one of you went full spandosretard.

They could have had him 2 years ago at the scene of the crime if they'd given two shits at the time.

TheDancinMonarch wrote:Well. Now isn't THAT convenient. Pardon my cynicism.

So you would prefer him to remain loose? How is it convenient? Your anti-Americanism is going stale.

Grizalltheway wrote:

Baldy wrote:

Look at the posts, Badly. Each one of you went full spandosretard.

Yup - I worry about the right - they are all turning into wacko conspirasists with guns. Baldy, et al are going to start killing cops and other government officials any day now.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote: Look at the posts, Badly. Each one of you went full spandosretard.

They could have had him 2 years ago at the scene of the crime if they'd given two shits at the time.

According to what CREDIBLE source?

dbackjon wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote: Look at the posts, Badly. Each one of you went full spandosretard.

Yup - I worry about the right - they are all turning into wacko conspirasists with guns. Baldy, et al are going to start killing cops and other government officials any day now.

We can hope

dbackjon wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
They could have had him 2 years ago at the scene of the crime if they'd given two shits at the time.

According to what CREDIBLE source?

The gum I just stepped in is more credible than a news "story" written by the idiot in chief. This is a big lie just like when Clinton didn't get his dick sucked by that fat chick that wasn't his wife.

dbackjon wrote:

TheDancinMonarch wrote:Well. Now isn't THAT convenient. Pardon my cynicism.

So you would prefer him to remain loose? How is it convenient? Your anti-Americanism is going stale.

If this were Romney, you'd be singing a different tune.

Ibanez wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

So you would prefer him to remain loose? How is it convenient? Your anti-Americanism is going stale.

If this were Romney, you'd be singing a different tune.

You mean Bush, Romney is unelectable

Ibanez wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

So you would prefer him to remain loose? How is it convenient? Your anti-Americanism is going stale.

If this were Romney, you'd be singing a different tune.

You mean if Hillary weren't getting ready to run for president, he'd be singing a different tune.

Ibanez wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

So you would prefer him to remain loose? How is it convenient? Your anti-Americanism is going stale.

If this were Romney, you'd be singing a different tune.

No - I didn't post "how convenient when Saddam was captured.
But if Romney was elected we'd have 50K troops in and dying in Syria, etc. right now.


Of course, the left was the only ones smart enough to question the whole Iraqi debacle, and got labeled anti-American for doing so - turns out we were right all along - the invasion of Iraq is going to go down as one of the biggest debacles in US history. Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Rice are war criminals that need to be locked up.

89Hen wrote:

Ibanez wrote: If this were Romney, you'd be singing a different tune.

You mean if Hillary weren't getting ready to run for president, he'd be singing a different tune.

I'd rather have Elizabeth