Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

According to the LEFT-leaning Brookings Institute, it's Fox News. Not even Democrats will watch MSNBC; heck, MSNBC barely out-rates the horrible satirical show The Daily Show among Democrats.

Fox News wins out among Republicans, Independents, and Conservatives. Best for Democrats, Moderates, and Liberals? Broadcast network news, but not by as much, particularly among Moderates. Fox News ALSO noses out broadcast network news among all Americans.



Brookings also polled respondents about what matters most to them. Guess what? The "issues" Liberals and Democrats like to accuse Republicans and Conservatives of pandering to don't even make it on the list. Republicans and Conservatives care about "bread and butter" issues like public safety, not contrived things like the phony "war on women," and certainly not distraction politics. Heck, most Democrats and Liberals aren't even buying the new platform "issues" of climate change and immigration reform foisted by Left-leaning leaders.



The Left has no clue. They can't even gauge their own constituent base, much less accurately describe the opponents. And this from a Left-wing think tank. SMH....

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/06/146409- ... ing-group/

I'll try to explain this slowly for you:
Most reasonably intelligent people don't watch (or trust) either FOX News or MSNBC

So who does that leave left over to fill out the poll data..?
I'll wait here for you - take your time - this is not a trick question

Chizzang wrote:I'll try to explain this slowly for you:
Most reasonably intelligent people don't watch (or trust) either FOX News or MSNBC

So who does that leave left over to fill out the poll data..?
I'll wait here for you - take your time - this is not a trick question

Ah...but what network is watched by the largest number of "reasonably intelligent" people? First you're going to have to provide some criteria or a criterion for how we identify someone as "reasonably intelligent." Surely it would have to be at least 100 IQ. But would you make it higher?

JohnStOnge wrote:

Chizzang wrote:I'll try to explain this slowly for you:
Most reasonably intelligent people don't watch (or trust) either FOX News or MSNBC

So who does that leave left over to fill out the poll data..?
I'll wait here for you - take your time - this is not a trick question

Ah...but what network is watched by the largest number of "reasonably intelligent" people? First you're going to have to provide some criteria or a criterion for how we identify someone as "reasonably intelligent." Surely it would have to be at least 100 IQ. But would you make it higher?

Regardless of whatever you're getting at John...
You are Ideologically completely invested in Conservatism as well as an closet apologetic fundamentalist

FOX News was made just for YOU....

Chizzang wrote:I'll try to explain this slowly for you:
Most reasonably intelligent people don't watch (or trust) either FOX News or MSNBC

So who does that leave left over to fill out the poll data..?
I'll wait here for you - take your time - this is not a trick question

Or CNN...

JohnStOnge wrote:

Chizzang wrote:I'll try to explain this slowly for you:
Most reasonably intelligent people don't watch (or trust) either FOX News or MSNBC

So who does that leave left over to fill out the poll data..?
I'll wait here for you - take your time - this is not a trick question

Ah...but what network is watched by the largest number of "reasonably intelligent" people? First you're going to have to provide some criteria or a criterion for how we identify someone as "reasonably intelligent." Surely it would have to be at least 100 IQ. But would you make it higher?

standing next to me a person with a 100 IQ would appear to be mildly retarded



im just saying

Chizzang wrote:I'll try to explain this slowly for you:
Most reasonably intelligent people don't watch (or trust) either FOX News or MSNBC

So who does that leave left over to fill out the poll data..?
I'll wait here for you - take your time - this is not a trick question

I will explain it even s. L. O w. E. R........for you.

Fox News is no different than CNN other than it's entertaining and upbeat. Both have an agenda and neither of them are MSNBC.

There's an old man in Savannah that walks the squares, crying out that we're all going to hell. He's less biased than our MSM.

I'll take CNN.

MSNBC is unwatchable - Fox News is good until you get to the prime-time programming which is over-the-top partisan. But before 8pm it's OK.

Chizzang wrote:You are Ideologically completely invested in Conservatism

Not to go completely off on a tangent, but comments like these get me thinking. Maybe it's not what you really meant, but to say somebody is "invested in Conservatism" sounds like you are saying JSO believes what he believes because it's the platform of Conservatism and he wants to follow along. I'd argue that he's a Conservative because of what he believes and the platform follows the lead of people with strong conviction in similar beliefs. I do think there are people who identify themselves as one party or the other and on certain issues are spoonfed their opinion by the party, but I don't think anyone here would argue that JSO is not 100% sure of his beliefs. Anyway, carry on.

89Hen wrote:

Chizzang wrote:You are Ideologically completely invested in Conservatism

Not to go completely off on a tangent, but comments like these get me thinking. Maybe it's not what you really meant, but to say somebody is "invested in Conservatism" sounds like you are saying JSO believes what he believes because it's the platform of Conservatism and he wants to follow along. I'd argue that he's a Conservative because of what he believes and the platform follows the lead of people with strong conviction in similar beliefs. I do think there are people who identify themselves as one party or the other and on certain issues are spoonfed their opinion by the party, but I don't think anyone here would argue that JSO is not 100% sure of his beliefs. Anyway, carry on.

People who are 100% sure of their beliefs are a big part of the problem.

kalm wrote:

89Hen wrote: Not to go completely off on a tangent, but comments like these get me thinking. Maybe it's not what you really meant, but to say somebody is "invested in Conservatism" sounds like you are saying JSO believes what he believes because it's the platform of Conservatism and he wants to follow along. I'd argue that he's a Conservative because of what he believes and the platform follows the lead of people with strong conviction in similar beliefs. I do think there are people who identify themselves as one party or the other and on certain issues are spoonfed their opinion by the party, but I don't think anyone here would argue that JSO is not 100% sure of his beliefs. Anyway, carry on.

People who are 100% sure of their beliefs are a big part of the problem.

So are people who don't have any thought.

89Hen wrote:

kalm wrote:
People who are 100% sure of their beliefs are a big part of the problem.

So are people who don't have any thought.

Ok.

89Hen wrote:

Chizzang wrote:You are Ideologically completely invested in Conservatism

Not to go completely off on a tangent, but comments like these get me thinking. Maybe it's not what you really meant, but to say somebody is "invested in Conservatism" sounds like you are saying JSO believes what he believes because it's the platform of Conservatism and he wants to follow along. I'd argue that he's a Conservative because of what he believes and the platform follows the lead of people with strong conviction in similar beliefs. I do think there are people who identify themselves as one party or the other and on certain issues are spoonfed their opinion by the party, but I don't think anyone here would argue that JSO is not 100% sure of his beliefs. Anyway, carry on.

Meh...
He tows the line pretty hard - I've never seen him step outside of a Conservative talking point
but I like your story Bro

Chizzang wrote:

89Hen wrote: Not to go completely off on a tangent, but comments like these get me thinking. Maybe it's not what you really meant, but to say somebody is "invested in Conservatism" sounds like you are saying JSO believes what he believes because it's the platform of Conservatism and he wants to follow along. I'd argue that he's a Conservative because of what he believes and the platform follows the lead of people with strong conviction in similar beliefs. I do think there are people who identify themselves as one party or the other and on certain issues are spoonfed their opinion by the party, but I don't think anyone here would argue that JSO is not 100% sure of his beliefs. Anyway, carry on.

Meh...
He tows the line pretty hard - I've never seen him step outside of a Conservative talking point
but I like your story Bro

lets start another pet peeve thread

its "TOES the line"

CID1990 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
Meh...
He tows the line pretty hard - I've never seen him step outside of a Conservative talking point
but I like your story Bro

lets start another pet peeve thread

its "TOES the line"

So it's Toes ( like lined up with)
or Towed like pulling ..?

Never knew that myself

Where JSO lives its "teaux the line"

What are we talking about?

Chizzang wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
lets start another pet peeve thread

its "TOES the line"

So it's Toes ( like lined up with)
or Towed like pulling ..?

Never knew that myself

Toes. Even directional U kids know that.

Chizzang wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
lets start another pet peeve thread

its "TOES the line"

So it's Toes ( like lined up with)
or Towed like pulling ..?

Never knew that myself

it is an old military thing.... when you stand in line with your comrades in response to an order... your toes are all on the imaginary line... you are "toeing the line"


what an awesome hijack we are completely off in outer space now

Chizzang wrote:

89Hen wrote: Not to go completely off on a tangent, but comments like these get me thinking. Maybe it's not what you really meant, but to say somebody is "invested in Conservatism" sounds like you are saying JSO believes what he believes because it's the platform of Conservatism and he wants to follow along. I'd argue that he's a Conservative because of what he believes and the platform follows the lead of people with strong conviction in similar beliefs. I do think there are people who identify themselves as one party or the other and on certain issues are spoonfed their opinion by the party, but I don't think anyone here would argue that JSO is not 100% sure of his beliefs. Anyway, carry on.

Meh...
He tows the line pretty hard - I've never seen him step outside of a Conservative talking point
but I like your story Bro

You see what you want. You're as much a partisan as anyone here... cept maybe houndawg.

89Hen wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
Meh...
He tows the line pretty hard - I've never seen him step outside of a Conservative talking point
but I like your story Bro

You see what you want. You're as much a partisan as anyone here... cept maybe houndawg.

I think I might be the only guy on this forum who thinks that Conservatives are correct 49% of the time
and Liberals are correct 51% of the time...

which has convinced more than a few of you old farts that I'm an idiot

Oh, you said NEWS.......not Jews

Chizzang wrote:

89Hen wrote: You see what you want. You're as much a partisan as anyone here... cept maybe houndawg.

I think I might be the only guy on this forum who thinks that Conservatives are correct 49% of the time
and Liberals are correct 51% of the time...

which has convinced more than a few of you old farts that I'm an idiot

We may need to start another thread: You might be kidding yourself if...

There are very few fence straddlers here, and you sir are not one of them. Neither am I.

Grizalltheway wrote:What are we talking about?

She helped write their national anthem:

O Canada!

And she does make that palm tree look more like a maple leaf.