Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Yup...Yup!!

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/jer ... dy-n126941" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Swastikas too!

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/las ... dy-n126666" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And the two movie bombers in Virginia and Maryland are Obama followers...

Your point is???

Col Hogan wrote:And the two movie bombers in Virginia and Maryland are Obama followers...

Your point is???

The Bundy followers were anointed as "True Patriots"!

Col Hogan wrote:And the two movie bombers in Virginia and Maryland are Obama followers...

Your point is???

Link?

So what, they were just expressing themselves like the occupy douchebags but when the right does things we get results.

This....

"Investigators were looking into possible links between the couple and some of the groups that converged on rancher Cliven Bundy's property during his armed standoff with federal rangers over land rights."




Yup! Everyone should be armed as this so readily illustrates...

"A shopper, Joseph Robert Wilcox, 31, of Las Vegas had a concealed weapon and decided to confront Jerad Miller, police said. As he walked toward the suspect, Amanda Miller came up behind him and shot him several times in the ribs, police said. "

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/two ... ee-n125766" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

At least he had a chance against people willing to murder. Those two would have killed with or without a gun, you see....THEY made the choice to kill. Not an inanimate object. Could have been a car, rock or a knife.

Either way it's pretty irrelevant in the grand scheme.

Hell Chicago had 30 more shootings over the weekend and only the two white republicans make the news.

Intredasting

Well, I guess that solves it

only right wingers can be extreme and violent

let's pass a law

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:At least he had a chance against people willing to murder. Those two would have killed with or without a gun, you see....THEY made the choice to kill. Not an inanimate object. Could have been a car, rock or a knife.

Either way it's pretty irrelevant in the grand scheme.

Hell Chicago had 30 more shootings over the weekend and only the two white republicans make the news.

Intredasting

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...we don't talk about those things here.


BTW, Chicago murders are not defined as, "terrorism" because they don't threaten our government. Chicago shooting and murders are, in fact, a direct, and somewhat desired, result of our government system...a system that has been defined and implemented by Democrats for many decades.

If the news outlets actually covered the Chicago problems in detail, it would expose the Dumbocrat's failures.

Shit, thought this thread was about me. Bummer.
Carry on.

bandl wrote:Shit, thought this thread was about me. Bummer.
Carry on.

Was that the name of your porno series on the Playboy Channel?

VictorG wrote:This....

"Investigators were looking into possible links between the couple and some of the groups that converged on rancher Cliven Bundy's property during his armed standoff with federal rangers over land rights."

This was a not-so-covert press leak by Obama liar-du-jour Sally Jewell who has refused to confirm or deny the press leak...

...I.e., it's a false flag.

Unlike the press leak that children who spend the night at the WH are molested by Michelle Obama.



Jewell is a stupid ****; the shooters are human flotsam; and VictorG is a confirmed paid progressive political operative.

Cluck U wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:At least he had a chance against people willing to murder. Those two would have killed with or without a gun, you see....THEY made the choice to kill. Not an inanimate object. Could have been a car, rock or a knife.

Either way it's pretty irrelevant in the grand scheme.

Hell Chicago had 30 more shootings over the weekend and only the two white republicans make the news.

Intredasting

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...we don't talk about those things here.


BTW, Chicago murders are not defined as, "terrorism" because they don't threaten our government. Chicago shooting and murders are, in fact, a direct, and somewhat desired, result of our government system...a system that has been defined and implemented by Democrats for many decades.

If the news outlets actually covered the Chicago problems in detail, it would expose the Dumbocrat's failures.

Ideology based violence vs. street violence. Both bad, but seperate issues.

kalm wrote:

Cluck U wrote:
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...we don't talk about those things here.


BTW, Chicago murders are not defined as, "terrorism" because they don't threaten our government. Chicago shooting and murders are, in fact, a direct, and somewhat desired, result of our government system...a system that has been defined and implemented by Democrats for many decades.

If the news outlets actually covered the Chicago problems in detail, it would expose the Dumbocrat's failures.

Ideology based violence vs. street violence. Both bad, but seperate issues.

I'm sure there is some vague gun rights/gun control argument that can intertwine the two. Care to take a stab at it?

Cluck U wrote:

BTW, Chicago murders are not defined as, "terrorism" because they don't threaten our government. Chicago shooting and murders are, in fact, a direct, and somewhat desired, result of our government system...a system that has been defined and implemented by Democrats for many decades.

Wait?
Aren't all shootings (or killings) kinda a good thing..?
I mean in the completely pathological evolutionary kind of way (Right?)



If you remove the emotion and just review...

kalm wrote:

Cluck U wrote:
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...we don't talk about those things here.


BTW, Chicago murders are not defined as, "terrorism" because they don't threaten our government. Chicago shooting and murders are, in fact, a direct, and somewhat desired, result of our government system...a system that has been defined and implemented by Democrats for many decades.

If the news outlets actually covered the Chicago problems in detail, it would expose the Dumbocrat's failures.

Ideology based violence vs. street violence. Both bad, but seperate issues.

Wait...you don't believe that the people perpetrating the violence in Chicago have an ideology behind them?

Seriously?

Chizzang wrote:

Cluck U wrote:

BTW, Chicago murders are not defined as, "terrorism" because they don't threaten our government. Chicago shooting and murders are, in fact, a direct, and somewhat desired, result of our government system...a system that has been defined and implemented by Democrats for many decades.

Wait?
Aren't all shootings (or killings) kinda a good thing..?
I mean in the completely pathological evolutionary kind of way (Right?)



If you remove the emotion and just review...

Moot of the shootings help clear out the riff-raff.

However, occasionally, someone not involved in stupidity gets shot.

Whelp. Had to call the cops on a right wing extremist flying his Gadsden flag and threatening violence if we continued digging on the VDOT right of way in front of his house.

I've had people get pissed at us before. But, this was a first.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Whelp. Had to call the cops on a right wing extremist flying his Gadsden flag and threatening violence if we continued digging on the VDOT right of way in front of his house.

I've had people get pissed at us before. But, this was a first.

I take a couple of things from this

1. you dig ditches

2. be careful- several years ago I played the pipes at the funerals of two cops killed because they got called to one of these free-soilers' house by road workers trying to dig in the right of way in front of their house. dude and his wife executed them right on the front porch while they were knocking on the door

i do dig ditches.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shovel_test_pit" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

and, yeah. we are pretty careful. we just move on to next property until someone of higher authority explains to them that we're lawfully there.

Skjellyfetti wrote:i do dig ditches.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shovel_test_pit" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

and, yeah. we are pretty careful. we just move on to next property until someone of higher authority explains to them that we're lawfully there.

That struck me as funny because that's what parents used to tell their kids- I know my Dad told me-

"If you aren't careful you'll be digging ditches for a living"

Yup. Definitely knew what you were getting at. Hear that a lot. That and "the world needs ditch diggers too"

Skjellyfetti wrote:Yup. Definitely knew what you were getting at. Hear that a lot. That and "the world needs ditch diggers too"

What town in VA are you digging in?

The world also needs people who constantly quote Caddyshack.

Grizalltheway wrote:The world also needs people who constantly quote Caddyshack.

How 'bout a Fresca?