Page 1 of 2
-1.0%
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 6:49 am
by Baldy
GDP Contracted at 1% Pace in First Quarter
WASHINGTON—The U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of 2014, the latest stumble for a recovery that has struggled to find its footing since the recession ended almost five years ago.
Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of goods and services produced across the economy, contracted at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.0% in the first three months of the year, the Commerce Department said Thursday. It was the first time economic output contracted since the first quarter of 2011, when it declined at a 1.3% pace.
Government economists had previously estimated GDP slowed to a 0.1% growth rate in the first quarter as harsh winter weather disrupted work sites, curtailed foot traffic at retail stores and snarled transportation networks across much of the U.S. The newly revised estimate incorporates additional economic data released in recent weeks. Higher-than-expected imports and slower-than-expected inventory growth dragged the economy into negative territory.

Re: -1.0%
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 6:52 am
by ASUG8
Give the OMB time to adjust it again over the next few weeks. It will be positive before the dust settles.

Re: -1.0%
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 6:53 am
by CID1990
Baldy wrote:
GDP Contracted at 1% Pace in First Quarter
WASHINGTON—The U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of 2014, the latest stumble for a recovery that has struggled to find its footing since the recession ended almost five years ago.
Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of goods and services produced across the economy, contracted at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.0% in the first three months of the year, the Commerce Department said Thursday. It was the first time economic output contracted since the first quarter of 2011, when it declined at a 1.3% pace.
Government economists had previously estimated GDP slowed to a 0.1% growth rate in the first quarter as harsh winter weather disrupted work sites, curtailed foot traffic at retail stores and snarled transportation networks across much of the U.S. The newly revised estimate incorporates additional economic data released in recent weeks. Higher-than-expected imports and slower-than-expected inventory growth dragged the economy into negative territory.

WSJ
tabloid garbage
Figured I'd get that out of the way.
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 6:57 am
by Ibanez
Baldy wrote:
GDP Contracted at 1% Pace in First Quarter
WASHINGTON—The U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of 2014, the latest stumble for a recovery that has struggled to find its footing since the recession ended almost five years ago.
Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of goods and services produced across the economy, contracted at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.0% in the first three months of the year, the Commerce Department said Thursday. It was the first time economic output contracted since the first quarter of 2011, when it declined at a 1.3% pace.
Government economists had previously estimated GDP slowed to a 0.1% growth rate in the first quarter as harsh winter weather disrupted work sites, curtailed foot traffic at retail stores and snarled transportation networks across much of the U.S. The newly revised estimate incorporates additional economic data released in recent weeks. Higher-than-expected imports and slower-than-expected inventory growth dragged the economy into negative territory.

This is because all those traitorous, inbreeding conk fucks weren't working as hard as they should have been.
Dback, did I get that right?
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 6:59 am
by AZGrizFan
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 7:14 am
by Pwns
It's the fault of climate change.
The January through March period tends to be the slowest for growth, he noted, and this year, colder than usual weather stunted retail sales, international trade and the housing market.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/05/29/investi ... ?hpt=hp_t2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 9:30 am
by Ivytalk
CID1990 wrote:
WSJ
tabloid garbage
Figured I'd get that out of the way.
You were expecting maybe Glenn Greenwald?

Re: -1.0%
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 9:31 am
by OL FU
I may be the oddball here (well don't answer that) but from what I see anecdotally, I do think this one is an anomaly. I don't think we are kicking around at 5% growth but I would be amazed if the second quarter doesn't come in at the soaring 2% we are used to

Re: -1.0%
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 9:38 am
by YoUDeeMan
OL FU wrote:I may be the oddball here (well don't answer that) but from what I see anecdotally, I do think this one is an anomaly. I don't think we are kicking around at 5% growth but I would be amazed if the second quarter doesn't come in at the soaring 2% we are used to

I'm doing my best to stimulate the economy...we're putting an addition on our house as I type.
I was going to wait until the Obama administration was out of office, so it would not make him look good...but the clown doesn't look as if he is stepping down anytime soon.

Re: -1.0%
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 3:43 pm
by CitadelGrad
OL FU wrote:I may be the oddball here (well don't answer that) but from what I see anecdotally, I do think this one is an anomaly. I don't think we are kicking around at 5% growth but I would be amazed if the second quarter doesn't come in at the soaring 2% we are used to

All the data that I've been reading for the last 6-9 months makes the 1Q numbers about what one would expect.
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 5:08 am
by OL FU
CitadelGrad wrote:OL FU wrote:I may be the oddball here (well don't answer that) but from what I see anecdotally, I do think this one is an anomaly. I don't think we are kicking around at 5% growth but I would be amazed if the second quarter doesn't come in at the soaring 2% we are used to

All the data that I've been reading for the last 6-9 months makes the 1Q numbers about what one would expect.
Serious question. What would you expect for the 2nd quarter?
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 6:16 am
by bluehenbillk
OL FU wrote:
Serious question. What would you expect for the 2nd quarter?
+ 2.5% - 3.5%
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 11:42 am
by CitadelGrad
OL FU wrote:CitadelGrad wrote:
All the data that I've been reading for the last 6-9 months makes the 1Q numbers about what one would expect.
Serious question. What would you expect for the 2nd quarter?
I would say somewhere in the range of 0% to 1.5%, probably toward the lower end of the range. That will be enough to keep us out of a technical recession (or give Obama another lame excuse to talk about economic recovery). Either way, it won't be enough to create any significant permanent job growth. Of course, we haven't had a GDP growth rate that could do that in a very very long time.
Really, if you factor out the immediate effects of QE, we've been in a pretty deep recession since 2008.
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 11:45 am
by CitadelGrad
bluehenbillk wrote:OL FU wrote:
Serious question. What would you expect for the 2nd quarter?
+ 2.5% - 3.5%
So you are predicting a Q to Q improvement of 3.5% to 4.5%? And what exactly do you think will be the cause(s) of this astonishingly rapid growth?
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 11:59 am
by Baldy
CitadelGrad wrote:bluehenbillk wrote:
+ 2.5% - 3.5%
So you are predicting a Q to Q improvement of 3.5% to 4.5%? And what exactly do you think will be the cause(s) of this astonishingly rapid growth?
Someone will put their thumb on the scale. It will then be revised DOWN a month later in the dark of night.
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 5:51 am
by Baldy
UPDATE:
US GDP for the 1st quarter has been revised down (big shock) to an actual -2.9%. Was forecast to be -1.8%.
Damn you George W. Bush.

Re: -1.0%
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 6:18 am
by OL FU
Baldy wrote:UPDATE:
US GDP for the 1st quarter has been revised down (big shock) to an actual -2.9%. Was forecast to be -1.8%.
Damn you George W. Bush.

That was one cold winter

Re: -1.0%
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 6:51 am
by GannonFan
OL FU wrote:Baldy wrote:UPDATE:
US GDP for the 1st quarter has been revised down (big shock) to an actual -2.9%. Was forecast to be -1.8%.
Damn you George W. Bush.

That was one cold winter

Yup, it's all because it got cold. And George Bush. And Republican House of Representatives. And Sodomy.
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:17 am
by Cap'n Cat
It's Congress, girls. Not Obama, not Bush.

Re: -1.0%
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:22 am
by CID1990
Cap'n Cat wrote:It's Congress, girls. Not Obama, not Bush.

It's those uncompromising tea baggers
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:41 am
by AZGrizFan
Obama just read about it in the newspaper. He's pissed. Heads will roll...
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:45 am
by OL FU
CID1990 wrote:Cap'n Cat wrote:It's Congress, girls. Not Obama, not Bush.

It's those uncompromising tea baggers
Bastages aren't appropriatin' enough. We should be spending 5 Trillion a year, then we would have some stimulatin' goin' on.

Re: -1.0%
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:46 am
by Cap'n Cat
Regardless, Cheney should be in jail.
Re: -1.0%
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:50 am
by CitadelGrad
Cold winter, my ass.
Now isn't this interesting?

Re: -1.0%
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:58 am
by CAA Flagship