Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/wid ... dge-n91881" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"A widow was given ample notice before her $280,000 house was sold at a tax auction three years ago over $6.30 in unpaid interest, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled."

Freeloader!

Where is the BLM!!!!

Now, if the debt had been $6.93, a mere 10% more, would the result have been the same?

Should have paid her taxes. Idiot.

Vidav wrote:Should have paid her taxes. Idiot.

Hey, Russian, shouldn't you be helping your homeskis foment a rebellion in Eastern Ukraine?

Ivytalk wrote:Now, if the debt had been $6.93, a mere 10% more, would the result have been the same?

Now where do I remember this ^ from...?
it seems strangely familiar

Vidav wrote:Should have paid her taxes. Idiot.

Yes, but the punishment is still draconian. How much money did the commonwealth spend to collect $6.30? Sounds like everyone involved in this story is an idiot.

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Freeloader!

Where is the BLM!!!!

Fuck the BLM, where are the militias when you need them.

Well, here's a lesson about who really owns your home -- even if it is totally paid off.

BlueHen86 wrote:

Vidav wrote:Should have paid her taxes. Idiot.

Yes, but the punishment is still draconian. How much money did the commonwealth spend to collect $6.30? Sounds like everyone involved in this story is an idiot.

If I worked in the tax department, I would have paid the $6.30 on her behalf a long time ago (or even the $235), rather than do something this unconscionable. I couldn't live with myself selling a home from under a widow for this kind of money.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psB0cidB5bg[/youtube]

Chizzang wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:Now, if the debt had been $6.93, a mere 10% more, would the result have been the same?

Now where do I remember this ^ from...?
it seems strangely familiar

I am certain if you search your Donklopedia, it will come to you.

JoltinJoe wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
Yes, but the punishment is still draconian. How much money did the commonwealth spend to collect $6.30? Sounds like everyone involved in this story is an idiot.

If I worked in the tax department, I would have paid the $6.30 on her behalf a long time ago (or even the $235), rather than do something this unconscionable. I couldn't live with myself selling a home from under a widow for this kind of money.

Me too. If any of the people involved in this story are elected officials they need to be voted out ASAP.

JoltinJoe wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
Yes, but the punishment is still draconian. How much money did the commonwealth spend to collect $6.30? Sounds like everyone involved in this story is an idiot.

If I worked in the tax department, I would have paid the $6.30 on her behalf a long time ago (or even the $235), rather than do something this unconscionable. I couldn't live with myself selling a home from under a widow for this kind of money.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psB0cidB5bg[/youtube]

The cost to sell this home FAR EXCEEDS the amount owed. What a crime.

When we sell homes for taxes in my office we make money. It costs us nothing.

I just read the article, if she had 3 notices then the shame is on her. However, courts should exercise some common sense.

Remember this - the govt always wins.

Vidav wrote:When we sell homes for taxes in my office we make money. It costs us nothing.

not exactly. Someone has to do the paperwork. Process payments, title and deed the property. Nobody works for free.

If I worked in the tax department, I would have paid the $6.30 on her behalf a long time ago (or even the $235), rather than do something this unconscionable. I couldn't live with myself selling a home from under a widow for this kind of money.

Me too. If any of the people involved in this story are elected officials they need to be voted out ASAP.

I was thinking the same thing as I was reading the article.

BTW, this sort of thing is why I am completely against property taxes. Find some other way to fund things.

I understand the rationale behind property taxes but the bottom line is that I don't like a system whereby government can seize somebody's property or tax them out of it. I've seen land rich but money poor people taxed out of their property before and it's not pretty. You should not have to pay money to government in order to keep your property.

Ibanez wrote:

Vidav wrote:When we sell homes for taxes in my office we make money. It costs us nothing.

not exactly. Someone has to do the paperwork. Process payments, title and deed the property. Nobody works for free.

Tax sales have fees for processing the paperwork. The govt makes money.

HI54UNI wrote:

Ibanez wrote: not exactly. Someone has to do the paperwork. Process payments, title and deed the property. Nobody works for free.

Tax sales have fees for processing the paperwork. The govt makes money.

We charge the people to take the tax lien in the first place.

I know I smacked him in another thread the other day, but in THIS case, I'm with Joe. This is a freaking miscarriage of justice.

Javert!

SuperHornet wrote:I know I smacked him in another thread the other day, but in THIS case, I'm with Joe. This is a freaking miscarriage of justice.

Javert!

What is the limit for you? At which point is it okay/not okay?

Don't back me into a corner, V. The point is that doing this over a matter of just pennies just to observe the "letter of the law" is bogus. It's entirely possible that she never got the notices, or misplaced them. There are instances of letters getting misrouted for decades. This is javertian, and everyone freaking knows it.

The PROPER move is to forgive the tax debt. For just $6.30, it's clear that she's not a true "tax cheat."

SuperHornet wrote:Don't back me into a corner, V. The point is that doing this over a matter of just pennies just to observe the "letter of the law" is bogus. It's entirely possible that she never got the notices, or misplaced them. There are instances of letters getting misrouted for decades. This is javertian, and everyone freaking knows it.

The PROPER move is to forgive the tax debt. For just $6.30, it's clear that she's not a true "tax cheat."

Again, at what level do you forgive?