SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:05 pm
Been trying to tell you kalm. You can do better.
Been trying to tell you kalm. You can do better.
Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
SMH @ Rolling Stone
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=39606
Page 1 of 1
Been trying to tell you kalm. You can do better.
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:12 pm
I could have sworn JH signed the constitution!
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:26 pm
People who get their political commentary from a music rag probably do.kalm wrote:I could have sworn JH signed the constitution!
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:29 pm
Could be, but I'll wager they're better informed the average Fox viewer.Baldy wrote:People who get their political commentary from a music rag probably do.kalm wrote:I could have sworn JH signed the constitution!
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:35 pm
They left off "four score and seven years ago", too.
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:37 pm
kalm wrote:Could be, but I'll wager they're better informed the average Fox viewer.Baldy wrote: People who get their political commentary from a music rag probably do.
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:04 pm
Yet the average NON Fox viewer thought JH was a signer...kalm wrote:Could be, but I'll wager they're better informed the average Fox viewer.Baldy wrote: People who get their political commentary from a music rag probably do.
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:09 pm
seems like something to get worked up about for sure.
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:21 pm
Donks have gotten worked up over dumber stuff, for sure.Skjellyfetti wrote:seems like something to get worked up about for sure.
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:45 pm
Oh...and I'd hit it.
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:49 pm
In the M/F/K world, she's an F.kalm wrote:Oh...and I'd hit it.
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:01 pm
Dude, she's an heiress to some massive fortune, in addition to all the dough she's made in television. Definitely M, and possibly K later on.AZGrizFan wrote:In the M/F/K world, she's an F.kalm wrote:Oh...and I'd hit it.
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:26 pm
I think she's all of the above. She's the trifecta.Grizalltheway wrote:Dude, she's an heiress to some massive fortune, in addition to all the dough she's made in television. Definitely M, and possibly K later on.AZGrizFan wrote:
In the M/F/K world, she's an F.
Re: SMH @ Rolling Stone
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:32 pm
I never read up on her. Must be nice to be the daughter of a billionaire.