Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po0ugnMFRFo[/youtube]

If it wasn't bad enough that she's using the exact same memorized speech from town to town, state to state- She is even using the same "slip ups" during her speeking tours.

Notice how it was "funny" she said "physical therapy.. Yogurt.. yogurt.. yoga?" as she turns toward her astronaut husband Mark Kelly? Well, once would be strange/funny, but then she was caught doing the exact same routine on a road tour she thought wasn't being recorded.. It's obviously an act.

Let us not forget what happens if you are really shot in the head:


YOU DIE.

You know what percentage of people survive a headshot?

expandspanos wrote:If it wasn't bad enough that she's using the exact same memorized speech from town to town, state to state- She is even using the same "slip ups" during her speeking tours.

Notice how it was "funny" she said "physical therapy.. Yogurt.. yogurt.. yoga?" as she turns toward her astronaut husband Mark Kelly? Well, once would be strange/funny, but then she was caught doing the exact same routine on a road tour she thought wasn't being recorded.. It's obviously an act.

The only thing that is clear is that you're not a public speaker.

She worships owls! Owls I tell ya!!

expandspanos wrote:You know what percentage of people survive a headshot?

Actually it is much larger than you think, apparently.


I've been to quite a number of unsuccessful suicides

I even saw a dude once who did the "malcom X" Russian roulette thing and shot himself right in the temple... he walked out of the ER with a band aid two hours later

You really need to stay away from things you dont know anything about

93henfan wrote:She worships owls! Owls I tell ya!!

Most liberals are much smarter AFTER a severe head wound, why should she be any different?

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Most liberals are much smarter AFTER a severe head wound, why should she be any different?

Ha!

Good One!

6.5x52 Carcano round - 2400 fps

9mm - 1250-1400 fps

ASUG8 wrote:6.5x52 Carcano round - 2400 fps

9mm - 1250-1400 fps

Nah. That can't have anything to do with it. A bullet is a bullet is a bullet.

AZGrizFan wrote:

ASUG8 wrote:6.5x52 Carcano round - 2400 fps

9mm - 1250-1400 fps

Nah. That can't have anything to do with it. A bullet is a bullet is a bullet.

Well, only about 5% of people shot in the head survive.. and the likelyhood of surviving a bullet that penetrates the entire lobe of a brain is much lower- the highest survivability is if only one of the 4 quadrants (lobe split in half) is penetrated.

Funny her hair is conveniently brushed over where the massive exit wound and scars should be from being shot almost point-blank in the head, isn't it?

Oh, and Giffords now has regained use of her right arm! What a miraculous recovery! She'll be back to 100% soon.. can't say the same for 99.99999% of most other (real) gunshot to the head victims.. They're either permanetly braindamaged, or dead.. not doing fake little acting gigs.

Giffords should be dead- but instead she's traveling the country doing her fake scripted joke routine.. and trying to take away people's gun rights. Yogurt.. Yogurt.. (turns to husband) Yoga! You think it's a coincidence that keeps happening?

You want to see what a REAL gunshot to the head looks like?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2tM65ujiIs[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHXqQ4XCC6I[/youtube]

Those people (part of the 5% "lucky enough" not to die immediately) are not going on speaking tours, looking exactly like they did before being shot in the head- they were ACTUALLY SHOT IN THE HEAD.

ASUG8 wrote:6.5x52 Carcano round - 2400 fps

9mm - 1250-1400 fps

Ok, and Gabby Giffords was supposedly shot with a larger millimeter bullet than JFK was... As long as it goes through the entire head, that's really all that matters, speed isn't as important as bullet width.

6.5 millimeter - JFK
9 millimeter - Giffords

I love where you are going with this. Pure genius

expandspanos wrote:

ASUG8 wrote:6.5x52 Carcano round - 2400 fps

9mm - 1250-1400 fps

Ok, and Gabby Giffords was supposedly shot with a larger millimeter bullet than JFK was... As long as it goes through the entire head, that's really all that matters, speed isn't as important as bullet width.

6.5 millimeter - JFK
9 millimeter - Giffords

Think it might have something to do with the TYPE of bullet?

expandspanos wrote: speed isn't as important as bullet width.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRmc9IPGmiA[/youtube]

expandspanos wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Nah. That can't have anything to do with it. A bullet is a bullet is a bullet.

Well, only about 5% of people shot in the head survive.. and the likelyhood of surviving a bullet that penetrates the entire lobe of a brain is much lower- the highest survivability is if only one of the 4 quadrants (lobe split in half) is penetrated.

Funny her hair is conveniently brushed over where the massive exit wound and scars should be from being shot almost point-blank in the head, isn't it?

Oh, and Giffords now has regained use of her right arm! What a miraculous recovery! She'll be back to 100% soon.. can't say the same for 99.99999% of most other (real) gunshot to the head victims.. They're either permanetly braindamaged, or dead.. not doing fake little acting gigs.

Giffords should be dead- but instead she's traveling the country doing her fake scripted joke routine.. and trying to take away people's gun rights. Yogurt.. Yogurt.. (turns to husband) Yoga! You think it's a coincidence that keeps happening?

You want to see what a REAL gunshot to the head looks like?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2tM65ujiIs[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHXqQ4XCC6I[/youtube]

Those people (part of the 5% "lucky enough" not to die immediately) are not going on speaking tours, looking exactly like they did before being shot in the head- they were ACTUALLY SHOT IN THE HEAD.

You are entirely and completely incorrect. All of it.

Your source that says only 5% of people shot in the head survive?

expandspanos wrote:

ASUG8 wrote:6.5x52 Carcano round - 2400 fps

9mm - 1250-1400 fps

Ok, and Gabby Giffords was supposedly shot with a larger millimeter bullet than JFK was... As long as it goes through the entire head, that's really all that matters, speed isn't as important as bullet width.

6.5 millimeter - JFK
9 millimeter - Giffords

Jesus, spanker, did you actually study at SLO?

Let me try to save you the great deal of embarrassment you will suffer if you run with this drivel that you spew.

Speed is much more important than bullet width because speed is where the energy comes from. If I shoot you in the head with a .22 it will do more damage to what passes for your brain than if I throw a .50 cal sniper round and hit you in the head with it. This is because the faster a bullet is moving the more kinetic energy it has. Kinetic energy increases proportionally to the square of the velocity. (KE= mv^2/2). So if you double the bullets velocity it increases the KE four times, triple the velocity the KE increases by a factor of nine. See? Pretty simple stuff and the main reason why you're such a failure as a conspiracy theorist. The engineers that charge you to watch them explain how the WTC was an inside job are amazed that you're stupid enough to believe them.

houndawg wrote:

expandspanos wrote:
Ok, and Gabby Giffords was supposedly shot with a larger millimeter bullet than JFK was... As long as it goes through the entire head, that's really all that matters, speed isn't as important as bullet width.

6.5 millimeter - JFK
9 millimeter - Giffords

Jesus, spanker, did you actually study at SLO?

Let me try to save you the great deal of embarrassment you will suffer if you run with this drivel that you spew.

Speed is much more important than bullet width because speed is where the energy comes from. If I shoot you in the head with a .22 it will do more damage to what passes for your brain than if I throw a .50 cal sniper round and hit you in the head with it. This is because the faster a bullet is moving the more kinetic energy it has. Kinetic energy increases proportionally to the square of the velocity. (KE= mv^2/2). So if you double the bullets velocity it increases the KE four times, triple the velocity the KE increases by a factor of nine. See? Pretty simple stuff and the main reason why you're such a failure as a conspiracy theorist. The engineers that charge you to watch them explain how the WTC was an inside job are amazed that you're stupid enough to believe them.

No rebuttal to the laws of physics? Its like you just don't care anymore, spankit.

houndawg wrote:

houndawg wrote:

Jesus, spanker, did you actually study at SLO?

Let me try to save you the great deal of embarrassment you will suffer if you run with this drivel that you spew.

Speed is much more important than bullet width because speed is where the energy comes from. If I shoot you in the head with a .22 it will do more damage to what passes for your brain than if I throw a .50 cal sniper round and hit you in the head with it. This is because the faster a bullet is moving the more kinetic energy it has. Kinetic energy increases proportionally to the square of the velocity. (KE= mv^2/2). So if you double the bullets velocity it increases the KE four times, triple the velocity the KE increases by a factor of nine. See? Pretty simple stuff and the main reason why you're such a failure as a conspiracy theorist. The engineers that charge you to watch them explain how the WTC was an inside job are amazed that you're stupid enough to believe them.

No rebuttal to the laws of physics? Its like you just don't care anymore, spankit.

He said width, when I think he meant weight.

A 115 gr. 9mm going 500fps or a 750 gr. .50 cal round going 500fps?

High powered rifle rounds are generally of smaller calibers than pistol rounds. If i had to take a bullet i would much rather take a 9mm parabellum than a 7 mm mauser

spanky totally sh1t the bed on this one

grizzaholic wrote:

houndawg wrote:

No rebuttal to the laws of physics? Its like you just don't care anymore, spankit.

He said width, when I think he meant weight.

A 115 gr. 9mm going 500fps or a 750 gr. .50 cal round going 500fps?

theres no mention of weight on the chart, only comparative sizes

he meant exactly what he said

full retard

CID1990 wrote:High powered rifle rounds are generally of smaller calibers than pistol rounds. If i had to take a bullet i would much rather take a 9mm parabellum than a 7 mm mauser

spanky totally sh1t the bed on this one

WHOA. I might have read Spanos wrong. (he is tough to read from time to time)

grizzaholic wrote:

CID1990 wrote:High powered rifle rounds are generally of smaller calibers than pistol rounds. If i had to take a bullet i would much rather take a 9mm parabellum than a 7 mm mauser

spanky totally sh1t the bed on this one

WHOA. I might have read Spanos wrong. (he is tough to read from time to time)

If you discerned one single shred of reality in his post then yeah,


you read him wrong

CID1990 wrote:

grizzaholic wrote:
WHOA. I might have read Spanos wrong. (he is tough to read from time to time)

If you discerned one single shred of reality in his post then yeah,


you read him wrong

Curious CID -

1. You think it's normal for people to be shot in the head, with a bullet supposedly traveling through their entire brain- and not have a scar or deformation to their head?

2. Do you think it's a "coincidence" that she happens to say "physical therapy.. Yogurt.. Yogurt.. (turns to her husband and points) Yoga" on multiple occasions and laughs?

Or do you think there is a slight possibility this woman is faking her condition and this event even included foreshadowing?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tTDiZZYCAs[/youtube]

Wouldn't be the first time someone faked a speech impediment to get what they want:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_A-SR0d_WkA[/youtube]

For proof she wasn't shot in the head- it's actually very simple: Just look at her head, there isn't any scar and her head is exactly the same it was before. This does NOT happen if you are actually shot in the head- Do a search for "shot in the head" and see the after effects.. it ain't pretty. Most everyone dies and those that aren't are left permanently disfigured.


Giffords before shooting


Giffords after shooting.. She actually got better looking it seems.



Watch out Hollywood! When celebrities find out getting shot in the head makes you more attractive, everybody's going to start doing it!


Shortly after "being shot in the head"




Looking pretty good Gabby!


Notice how there is absolutely no scaring to her forehead at all?


No gunshot scar there..

Not shot in the head. Come on people, figure it out!

Why does she have her right arm in a sling, if it's supposedly paralyzed.. no need to wear a sling, unless you want to make sure you don't move your arm accidentally when it's supposed to be paralyzed.. Don't need to worry about people seeing your non-existent scar with your hair combed over the supposed exit wound (that doesn't exist).

Looks like she won't have to wear the sling anymore to make sure she doesn't move her right arm, because now it's all back to normal! How convenient!

She likely got tired of the "paralyzed right arm" routine- and now she has "regained use of her right arm" MIRACULOUS!!

Article: Giffords Able To Move Right Arm Again, Three Years After Shooting

Next, she'll be talking totally the same as before and not limping.. she'll be back to 100% in no time. What a MIRACLE!!

No HI54 yet? Damn.

I've never seen this slant. Very interesting. So a massive plot to assasinate an obscure congress woman? I'm pretty sure a hell of a lot more than 5% survive gunshots to the head? Keep it going spando!