Page 1 of 2

Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:03 am
by Baldy
President Obama's Approval Rating Drops to Lowest Level of his Presidency
President Barack Obama's Job approval rating has plunged to the lowest of his presidency. 37% now approve of the job he is doing as president, down from 46% in October -- a nine point drop in just a month. Mr. Obama's disapproval rating is 57% -- the highest level for this president in CBS News Polls.
Capt'n Cat to attack the source as biased in 3...2...1... :coffee:

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:08 am
by Pwns
America just isn't ready for a black president.

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:11 am
by DSUrocks07
Image

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:57 am
by AZGrizFan
DSUrocks07 wrote:Image
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:34 pm
by CAA Flagship
WE NEED A LEADER!!!!!!!!

Image

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:49 pm
by TheDancinMonarch
CAA Flagship wrote:WE NEED A LEADER!!!!!!!!

Image
A leader or someone who can block out the sun.

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:51 pm
by ASUG8
TheDancinMonarch wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:WE NEED A LEADER!!!!!!!!

Image
A leader or someone who can block out the sun.
C'mon Monarch....Christie will be down to a svelte 340 by 2016. :nod: :lol:

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 1:43 pm
by YoUDeeMan
TheDancinMonarch wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:WE NEED A LEADER!!!!!!!!

Image
A leader or someone who can block out the sun.
Vote for Chris Christie...A President Who is Man Enough to Stop the Sun from Damaging Our Atmosphere!

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:44 pm
by TheDancinMonarch
ASUG8 wrote:
TheDancinMonarch wrote:
A leader or someone who can block out the sun.
C'mon Monarch....Christie will be down to a svelte 340 by 2016. :nod: :lol:
In golf people aspire to shoot their age. Christie will aspire to keep his weight under the year.

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:47 pm
by BDKJMU
Wait, Obama is at 37%? Damn, just a week or 2 ago he was at 39%, which was touted as the low of his presidency. How low will he go?

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:57 pm
by GrizFanStuckInUtah
BDKJMU wrote:Wait, Obama is at 37%? Damn, just a week or 2 ago he was at 39%, which was touted as the low of his presidency. How low will he go?
Image

Re: Freefall

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:59 pm
by D1B
BDKJMU wrote:Wait, Obama is at 37%? Damn, just a week or 2 ago he was at 39%, which was touted as the low of his presidency. How low will he go?
BDKWARTS's jack towel weighs 48 lbs. now. :thumb:

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 3:27 am
by Cap'n Cat
Congressional ObstructoConks are dragging the poor guy down.

:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 4:44 am
by CAA Flagship
Cap'n Cat wrote:Congressional ObstructoConks are dragging the poor guy down.

:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 5:49 am
by LeadBolt
Pwns wrote:America just isn't ready for a black president.
How would we know, we haven't had one yet. :coffee:

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:15 am
by BDKJMU
Now Obama is losing even the support of Dems....

"Obama hits new low with Dems

President Obama’s relationship with congressional Democrats has worsened to an unprecedented low, Democratic aides say.

They are letting it be known that House and Senate Democrats are increasingly frustrated, bitter and angry with the White House over ObamaCare’s botched rollout, and that the president’s mea culpa in a news conference last week failed to soothe any ill will.

Sources who attended a meeting of House chiefs of staff on Monday say the room was seething with anger over the immense damage being done to the Democratic Party and talk was of scrapping rollout events for the Affordable Care Act.
“Here we are, we’re supposed to be selling this to people, and it’s all screwed up,” one chief of staff ranted. “This either gets fixed or this could be the demise of the Democratic Party.

“It’s probably the worst I’ve ever seen it,” the aide said of the recent mood on Capitol Hill. “It’s bad. It’s really bad.”

Meanwhile, at a recent caucus meeting with Senate Democrats and White House chief of staff Denis McDonough, one senator stood up and asked for a political point of contact at the White House.

“There’s been an increase in frustration because people feel like they are continuing to be blindsided,” said one Democrat who attended the caucus meeting, adding that there’s a “check-the-box” mentality at the White House in dealing with lawmakers.

Democrats around Capitol Hill say there are lots of people to blame for the debacle that has engulfed them. But increasingly the anger is directed at one person only: Obama.

“Is he even more unpopular than George W. Bush? I think that’s already happened,” said one Democratic chief of staff.

Senior administration officials say they understand the frustration and anger on the opposite side of Pennsylvania Avenue and they realize Democrats are the ones who continue to take a hit.

But the senior officials say the most important thing the White House can do right now is to get the implementation of the healthcare law right. The feeling in the West Wing corridors lately is that once the rollout is fixed, the public will see all the positives behind ObamaCare.

“The policy will take care of the politics,” one senior administration official said.

But not everyone agrees with that sentiment — particularly those Democrats in both chambers who are up for reelection in 2014.

“They’re freaking out, as they should be,” said one senior Senate Democratic aide, adding that the rollout continues to be “a lasting mess.”

In the news conference last week, Obama accepted responsibility for the botched site and acknowledged that the failure of the rollout “has put a burden on Democrats, whether they’re running or not, because they stood up and supported this effort through thick and thin.

“And I feel deeply responsible for making it harder for them rather than easier for them to continue to promote the core values that I think led them to support this thing in the first place, which is, in this country, as wealthy as we are, everybody should be able to have the security of affordable healthcare,” Obama said. “And that’s why I feel so strongly about fixing it.”

The view among those in the Senate is that it would be helpful to have the ability to vote on a healthcare fix.

“People here want to be on the record showing support for fixing the problem,” the senior Senate aide said. “He should understand that. For someone who served in Congress, people are surprised how little he understands Congress.”

The White House hasn’t indicated just how much Obama will help campaign for those who are up for reelection next year. The president, who has been attending a string of fundraisers in recent days — including a West Coast check-collecting trip this weekend — is expected to help lawmakers and both campaign committees throughout 2014.

But as the healthcare problems continue to persist, lawmakers in swing districts aren’t sure that’s the best idea, especially because, according to one Democrat, “systemically you have what is a long-term problem.”

“It wouldn’t be helpful,” the Senate aide said. “Maybe he can help raise some money for Democrats, but that’s the extent of it.”

Democrats say the biggest favor Obama can do for them at the moment is to focus on untangling the web and trying to smooth out the glitches on healthcare.

“The only way he can really make it up to us is by fixing this s--t,” one Democratic House aide said.

Luckily, the aide surmised, Obama is going to want to fix the problem because his legacy is on the line.

“We have his own self interest working in our favor,” the aide said....."
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/he ... at-capitol" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:55 am
by Ibanez
Cap'n Cat wrote:Congressional ObstructoConks are dragging the poor guy down.

:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
No. His administrations failure to build a fucking website is bringing him down. Seriously it's 2013. 8 year olds can build a functioning website. 8 years old, dude. :coffee:


Seriously, all the bureaucracy and problems that are inherent in government contract and task order are the main culprits. With so much to do and so little time we can hardly fault the contractors. The DHHS and IRS were changing features and changing plans about how search for policies that the end result was an over complicated website that was vulnerable to security attacks as well as being overloaded. It was a bad decision to force people to sign up before they could browse for a plan.

The best bet is to hope this ends up like Bush's Medicare plan. That was fouled up and now, 9/10 medicare recipients love the site and the service.

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:57 am
by Ibanez
LeadBolt wrote:
Pwns wrote:America just isn't ready for a black president.
How would we know, we haven't had one yet. :coffee:
Woodrow Wilson has African ancestry in his family. Obama is mulatto. We're getting closer .


Besides, don't be so obtuse.

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:44 am
by kalm
Increases conk out of control spending and bailouts
Escalates War on Terror and Drone program
Institutes healthcare plan endorsed by Heritage and mimicking Romney's
Fails to prosecute a single Wall Street bankster while size of TBTF banks increases under his watch

Conks clap when his approval rating plummets…. :?

But somehow expect establishment/corporatist Christie will bring…wait for it….change! :suspicious:

:lol:

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:48 am
by AZGrizFan
Ibanez wrote: Seriously, all the bureaucracy and problems that are inherent in government contract and task order are the main culprits. With so much to do and so little time we can hardly fault the contractors. The DHHS and IRS were changing features and changing plans about how search for policies that the end result was an over complicated website that was vulnerable to security attacks as well as being overloaded. It was a bad decision to force people to sign up before they could browse for a plan.
:coffee: :coffee: :coffee:

Exactly what board CONKS have been saying for years. The government is NOT good at business. The government is NOT efficient. This thing will cost 3x as much as predicted and serve 1/10th of the people predicted.

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:50 am
by D1B
Ibanez wrote:
Cap'n Cat wrote:Congressional ObstructoConks are dragging the poor guy down.

:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
No. His administrations failure to build a fucking website is bringing him down. Seriously it's 2013. 8 year olds can build a functioning website. 8 years old, dude. :coffee:


Seriously, all the bureaucracy and problems that are inherent in government contract and task order are the main culprits. With so much to do and so little time we can hardly fault the contractors. The DHHS and IRS were changing features and changing plans about how search for policies that the end result was an over complicated website that was vulnerable to security attacks as well as being overloaded. It was a bad decision to force people to sign up before they could browse for a plan.

The best bet is to hope this ends up like Bush's Medicare plan. That was fouled up and now, 9/10 medicare recipients love the site and the service.
They should have called you in to set up, John Galt.

Image

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:54 am
by Ibanez
AZGrizFan wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Seriously, all the bureaucracy and problems that are inherent in government contract and task order are the main culprits. With so much to do and so little time we can hardly fault the contractors. The DHHS and IRS were changing features and changing plans about how search for policies that the end result was an over complicated website that was vulnerable to security attacks as well as being overloaded. It was a bad decision to force people to sign up before they could browse for a plan.
:coffee: :coffee: :coffee:

Exactly what board CONKS have been saying for years. The government is NOT good at business. The government is NOT efficient. This thing will cost 3x as much as predicted and serve 1/10th of the people predicted.
Well, i'm not a conk and i've been saying it. The government can be better but we need people to make the sacrifice (congressman need to make the correct decision, not the politically safe one) and force it to be held accountable and fiscally responsible.

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:57 am
by Ibanez
D1B wrote:
Ibanez wrote: No. His administrations failure to build a fucking website is bringing him down. Seriously it's 2013. 8 year olds can build a functioning website. 8 years old, dude. :coffee:


Seriously, all the bureaucracy and problems that are inherent in government contract and task order are the main culprits. With so much to do and so little time we can hardly fault the contractors. The DHHS and IRS were changing features and changing plans about how search for policies that the end result was an over complicated website that was vulnerable to security attacks as well as being overloaded. It was a bad decision to force people to sign up before they could browse for a plan.

The best bet is to hope this ends up like Bush's Medicare plan. That was fouled up and now, 9/10 medicare recipients love the site and the service.
They should have called you in to set up, John Galt.

Image
It's common sense and Comp.Sci 101. Building a website is easy, even a complicated one. The problems lie in the demands that the government made and the changing requirements. Couple that and they didn't start building it until Spring 2013, and you have a recipe for disaster. If you've ever worked with our government, you would understand. Obama should have pushed the launch date back.

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:08 am
by D1B
Ibanez wrote:
D1B wrote:
They should have called you in to set up, John Galt.

Image
It's common sense and Comp.Sci 101. Building a website is easy, even a complicated one. The problems lie in the demands that the government made and the changing requirements. Couple that and they didn't start building it until Spring 2013, and you have a recipe for disaster. If you've ever worked with our government, you would understand. Obama should have pushed the launch date back.
Agree totally. I'm serious. You appear to be a sharp guy.

Re: Freefall

Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:09 am
by mrklean
Pwns wrote:America just isn't ready for a black president.
JUST THE BACKWARDS AZZ REDNECKS :thumb: