Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Gas Guzzler - Conk Check
Animal not allowed in gas guzzler cuz it might ruin the Corinthian Leather - Conk Check
Doesn't care that a liberal is taking his picture abusing an animal - Conk Check


What a fucking dick - Conk Check

The dog is fine. Plenty of ventilation. And even if it wasn't fine, as long as it belongs to the people pulling it, it's nobody else's business. It's their property.

JohnStOnge wrote:The dog is fine. Plenty of ventilation. And even if it wasn't fine, as long as it belongs to the people pulling it, it's nobody else's business. It's their property.

He's probably scared with all the noises and bumping. What a Mitt Romney thing to do..

He's probably scared with all the noises and bumping.

It's a dog. It has no innate worth. It's worth is defined by what it means to the people that own it. It doesn't matter if it's scared by all the noises and bumping. It's not a human being. It's not anywhere close to being a human being. It's just a dog.

Not to mention the exhaust fumes.

conks - dog = property

donks - dog = family


clueless asshole.

JohnStOnge wrote:

He's probably scared with all the noises and bumping.

It's a dog. It has no innate worth. It's worth is defined by what it means to the people that own it. It doesn't matter if it's scared by all the noises and bumping. It's not a human being. It's not anywhere close to being a human being. It's just a dog.

True it's "just a dog" as you put it... and I'm fine with that
Then you say it has no innate worth: Why..?
And your answer is because it's not a human

That perspective is almost entirely unique (exclusive) to religious fundamentalist Johnny
Which you continually attempt to deny
But it's becoming painfully obvious

Then you say it has no innate worth: Why..?
And your answer is because it's not a human

That perspective is almost entirely unique (exclusive) to religious fundamentalist Johnny
Which you continually attempt to deny
But it's becoming painfully obvious

I don't know why you would say that. If the atheist perspective is true, for example, NOTHING has innate worth. There is worth in the sense of how much someone is willing to pay for something. A dog is worth, in dollars, what someone else is willing to pay for it. But some "philosophical" concept of "innate worth?" It does not exist. Everything just is. And a Leonardo da Vinci isn't innately "worth" any more than a grain of sand on a beach is.

Chizzang wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:
It's a dog. It has no innate worth. It's worth is defined by what it means to the people that own it. It doesn't matter if it's scared by all the noises and bumping. It's not a human being. It's not anywhere close to being a human being. It's just a dog.

True it's "just a dog" as you put it... and I'm fine with that
Then you say it has no innate worth: Why..?
And your answer is because it's not a human

That perspective is almost entirely unique (exclusive) to religious fundamentalist Johnny
Which you continually attempt to deny
But it's becoming painfully obvious

His whole schtik is trying to cover his fundamentalism with a veneer of science and logic. He's embarrassed that he believes the things he believes and uses science as a "hey, look over there" move.

Own who you are, Johnny. Life is too short to go through it ashamed of yourself.

houndawg wrote:

Chizzang wrote:

True it's "just a dog" as you put it... and I'm fine with that
Then you say it has no innate worth: Why..?
And your answer is because it's not a human

That perspective is almost entirely unique (exclusive) to religious fundamentalist Johnny
Which you continually attempt to deny
But it's becoming painfully obvious

His whole schtik is trying to cover his fundamentalism with a veneer of science and logic. He's embarrassed that he believes the things he believes and uses science as a "hey, look over there" move.

Own who you are, Johnny. Life is too short to go through it ashamed of yourself.

Indeed...
and meanwhile:
Religion divides all things into two classes: tools and enemies...

JohnStOnge wrote:

He's probably scared with all the noises and bumping.

It's a dog. It has no innate worth. It's worth is defined by what it means to the people that own it. It doesn't matter if it's scared by all the noises and bumping. It's not a human being. It's not anywhere close to being a human being. It's just a dog.

You have no innate worth.

houndawg wrote:

Chizzang wrote:

True it's "just a dog" as you put it... and I'm fine with that
Then you say it has no innate worth: Why..?
And your answer is because it's not a human

That perspective is almost entirely unique (exclusive) to religious fundamentalist Johnny
Which you continually attempt to deny
But it's becoming painfully obvious

His whole schtik is trying to cover his fundamentalism with a veneer of science and logic. He's embarrassed that he believes the things he believes and uses science as a "hey, look over there" move.

Own who you are, Johnny. Life is too short to go through it ashamed of yourself.

He's a fucking wack job, only he doesn't realize it. Sad to know that he procreated.

-

Who travels with their dog now a days
The new thing is to fly your dog in after you arrive

BlueHen86 wrote:

houndawg wrote:


His whole schtik is trying to cover his fundamentalism with a veneer of science and logic. He's embarrassed that he believes the things he believes and uses science as a "hey, look over there" move.

Own who you are, Johnny. Life is too short to go through it ashamed of yourself.

He's a **** wack job,only he doesn't realize it. Sad to know that he procreated.

I used to think he was just a really good troll.

Wonder what the circumstances of the dog being hauled in the back like that. Could be a dog that exhibits possible rabies being taken to a shelter for observation. Could be a government vehicle and not a family vehicle, that restricts the transport of animals this way. Was the dog sprayed by sprayed by a skunk? I'm not a jump to conclusions, Mrs. Kravitz like D1B.

houndawg wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
He's a **** wack job,only he doesn't realize it. Sad to know that he procreated.

I used to think he was just a really good troll.

I still lean that direction. He and SH may be the two greatest in history. But I DO wonder if he JSO was ever bit by a dog.

Gil Dobie wrote:Wonder what the circumstances of the dog being hauled in the back like that. Could be a dog that exhibits possible rabies being taken to a shelter for observation. Could be a government vehicle and not a family vehicle, that restricts the transport of animals this way. Sorry, not a jump to conclusions, Mrs. Kravitz like D1B.

Making excuses for people who abuse animals - Dildobie Conk Check
Can't tell a government vehicle from a civilian - Dildobie Conk Check
Couldn't figure out stuffing a potentially rabid dog in a small box is much more dangerous (Dildobiestupid) than just waiting for a animal transport vehicle like this one:


Dildobie Conk Check



Dumbass - Dildobie Conk Check

Bronco wrote:-

Who travels with their dog now a days
The new thing is to fly your dog in after you arrive

JohnStOnge wrote:

He's probably scared with all the noises and bumping.

It's a dog. It has no innate worth. It's worth is defined by what it means to the people that own it. It doesn't matter if it's scared by all the noises and bumping. It's not a human being. It's not anywhere close to being a human being. It's just a dog.

The same can be said for you. You have zero worth to me.

kalm wrote:

houndawg wrote:
I used to think he was just a really good troll.

I still lean that direction. He and SH may be the two greatest in history. But I DO wonder if he JSO was ever bit by a dog.

Probably every dog that sees him tries to bite him.

houndawg wrote:Not to mention the exhaust fumes.

conks - dog = property

donks - dog = family


clueless asshole.

Let's not generalize. My family is Republican and they are nothing like that. They support gay rights, women's rights, actually many liberal ideas and their dogs are treated better than most people treat their children.

Gil Dobie wrote:Wonder what the circumstances of the dog being hauled in the back like that. Could be a dog that exhibits possible rabies being taken to a shelter for observation. Could be a government vehicle and not a family vehicle, that restricts the transport of animals this way. Was the dog sprayed by sprayed by a skunk? I'm not a jump to conclusions, Mrs. Kravitz like D1B.

While the premise is true, we don't know why, I can assure you that any gov't animal control would not put a dog carrier on a wheel chair rack. The dog is in a kennel, it could sit next you on the seat and not bother you.

houndawg wrote:

kalm wrote:
I still lean that direction. He and SH may be the two greatest in history. But I DO wonder if he JSO was ever bit by a dog.

Probably every dog that sees him tries to bite him.

...and they get rabies, then Dildobie transports em in something like this:

HI54UNI wrote:

Conk turkey factory. Taxpayers pay 100% of his insurance costs. Conk farmer will profit from this accident.

Ibanez wrote:

houndawg wrote:Not to mention the exhaust fumes.

conks - dog = property

donks - dog = family


clueless asshole.

Let's not generalize. My family is Republican and they are nothing like that. They support gay rights, women's rights, actually many liberal ideas and their dogs are treated better than most people treat their children.

Don't be such a wet blanket.