Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

I hope the entire state drowns. We just need to start over.

Conks deserve every disaster.

D1B wrote:I hope the entire state drowns. We just need to start over.

Conks deserve every disaster.

Global Warming.....



Total record temps for the month of July (through the 30th)

Total record temps: 1295
Total record highs: 47
Total record lows: 451

I'll admit, this Global Warming is pissin me off. It has been too cool for me to go swimming in my pool most nights this summer.

D1B wrote:I hope the entire state drowns. We just need to start over.

Conks deserve every disaster.

What about the donks in those states?

Baldy wrote:

D1B wrote:I hope the entire state drowns. We just need to start over.

Conks deserve every disaster.

Global Warming.....



Total record temps for the month of July (through the 30th)

Total record temps: 1295
Total record highs: 47
Total record lows: 451

I'll admit, this Global Warming is pissin me off. It has been too cool for me to go swimming in my pool most nights this summer.

Looks lke that is only for the week 7/23 - 7/30. It would be interesting to see the whole month of July as much of the east coast had a significant heat wave during the middle of the month.

I'm not sure about you other southern fellas, but we've had such a mild summer. The temperatures could've been much higher.

Ibanez wrote:I'm not sure about you other southern fellas, but we've had such a mild summer. The temperatures could've been much higher.

Agreed. If this continues into the future, I say bring on global warming!

2012 July average high here - 92.5
2013 July average high here - 88.0

http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/greenv ... =7/01/2013" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Global warming my ass.

ASUMountaineer wrote:

Ibanez wrote:I'm not sure about you other southern fellas, but we've had such a mild summer. The temperatures could've been much higher.

Agreed. If this continues into the future, I say bring on global warming!

Doesn't global warming have the adverse effect? Essentially, it's a cooling a planet?

Ibanez wrote:

ASUMountaineer wrote:
Agreed. If this continues into the future, I say bring on global warming!

Doesn't global warming have the adverse effect? Essentially, it's a cooling a planet?

My understanding is that as the polar ice caps melt, it will cause a decline in average temperature that could be severe in some areas. It would also flood much of the coastal regions of the EC. I'm really not seeing a lose option here.

Marietta GA, July 2013 - Avg. High = 84.5 degrees. Four days with highs in the 90's. Six days with highs in the 70's. Highest high = 92 degrees.

July 2012 - Avg. High = 91 degrees. Highest high = 103 degrees.

Nice change from 2012 to 2013 of -6.5 average high temperature and -11 degrees extreme temperature.

Bring it on!

ASUMountaineer wrote:

Ibanez wrote:
Doesn't global warming have the adverse effect? Essentially, it's a cooling a planet?

My understanding is that as the polar ice caps melt, it will cause a decline in average temperature that could be severe in some areas. It would also flood much of the coastal regions of the EC. I'm really not seeing a lose option here.

Other than east coast fvcks moving west...

houndawg wrote:

ASUMountaineer wrote:
My understanding is that as the polar ice caps melt, it will cause a decline in average temperature that could be severe in some areas. It would also flood much of the coastal regions of the EC. I'm really not seeing a lose option here.

Other than east coast fvcks moving west...

I'm pretty sure the Pacific would rise too. You'd have west coast fvcks moving east.....

ASUG8 wrote:

houndawg wrote:
Other than east coast fvcks moving west...

I'm pretty sure the Pacific would rise too. You'd have west coast fvcks moving east.....

Well, there's two lose options...

Here in the Heartland we'll be referring to NY and LA as "float over country".

Been frickin cool up here in the Midwest this summer.

All-time lows of in the low 40s in July have been set this summer.

This week looks like low to mid 70s with one day in the 60s....

Also, it sucks for honey production.

houndawg wrote:

ASUMountaineer wrote:
My understanding is that as the polar ice caps melt, it will cause a decline in average temperature that could be severe in some areas. It would also flood much of the coastal regions of the EC. I'm really not seeing a lose option here.

Other than east coast fvcks moving west...

I'm far enough inland to not worry about...might even see a rise in property tax as I'll be even closer to the beach.

I tell you what, we east coast fvcks will stop moving west if the yankees quit moving south...deal?

D1B wrote:I hope the entire state drowns. We just need to start over.

Conks deserve every disaster.

WE do too, D. Considering the majority of the state that's elected Dems to power every election save the last one live east of the Blue Ridge. So bring on the flooding....start with the pig farmer's down east right on into Raleigh then up 40 to Chapel Hill.....you might actually get this state out of perpetual debt by flooding everything piedmont & East....

Appaholic wrote:

D1B wrote:I hope the entire state drowns. We just need to start over.

Conks deserve every disaster.

WE do too, D. Considering the majority of the state that's elected Dems to power every election save the last one live east of the Blue Ridge. So bring on the flooding....start with the pig farmer's down east right on into Raleigh then up 40 to Chapel Hill.....you might actually get this state out of perpetual debt by flooding everything piedmont & East....

If it floods Chapel Hill, that means we will be starting over in Washington DC also.

Ibanez wrote:

ASUMountaineer wrote:
Agreed. If this continues into the future, I say bring on global warming!

Doesn't global warming have the adverse effect? Essentially, it's a cooling a planet?

Yup. It's called the Progressive Inverse Principle. Whatever the research data suggests is opposite of reality.

i.e...Marijuana consumption results in the user becoming wiser.

See how it works?

Nobody doubts global "climate change"
Heck 25 thousand years ago this planet was in the midst of an ice age

What is in question is to what effect humans are playing in this latest round
It's a ridiculous debate however because neither side is interested in communicating like adults

Chizzang wrote:Nobody doubts global "climate change"
Heck 25 thousand years ago this planet was in the midst of an ice age

What is in question is to what effect humans are playing in this latest round
It's a ridiculous debate however because neither side is interested in communicating like adults

Neither side is interested in a pure, unobstructed scientific inquiry, either.

Chizzang wrote:...It's a ridiculous debate however because neither side is interested in communicating like adults

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... print.html

Like new Interior Sec. Sally Jewell, promoting open dialog and scientific debate:

In an agency-wide address to employees Aug. 1, Jewell took the unusual step of suggesting that no one working for her should challenge the idea that human activity is driving recent warming. “I hope there are no climate-change deniers in the Department of Interior,” she said.

We get rid of epic douchebags Salazar and Lubchenko, and wind up with a political Lenny.

CID1990 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:Nobody doubts global "climate change"
Heck 25 thousand years ago this planet was in the midst of an ice age

What is in question is to what effect humans are playing in this latest round
It's a ridiculous debate however because neither side is interested in communicating like adults

Neither side is interested in a pure, unobstructed scientific inquiry, either.

obviously...
There's a lot of money at stake for both sides (astronomical money)

Chizzang wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Neither side is interested in a pure, unobstructed scientific inquiry, either.

obviously...
There's a lot of money at stake for both sides (astronomical money)

I wonder which side has more people fooled?

My money's on the anthropogenic global warmingists. I thought liberals were supposed to be the smart ones, and yet they are led around by the nose with the occasional panicky documentary and Al Gore of all people.

All you have to do to create deniers on the right is just say "libruls invented this" 20 times

and they will come

CID1990 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
obviously...
There's a lot of money at stake for both sides (astronomical money)

I wonder which side has more people fooled?

My money's on the anthropogenic global warmingists. I thought liberals were supposed to be the smart ones, and yet they are led around by the nose with the occasional panicky documentary and Al Gore of all people.

All you have to do to create deniers on the right is just say "libruls invented this" 20 times

and they will come

For me it aint the Al Gore shit, it's the 2 million highly educated scientists and their body of evidence supporting AGW.