Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Problem, reaction, solution.

They're not just going for the 2nd Amendment... They're going for ingredients that could be used to make bullets even.. obvious sign that the gov. is preparing for something.

Senator to propose bill regulating black powder in wake of Boston Massacre

On April 17, New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg issued a statement to the public that he intends to propose a bill or amendment to regulate black powder, and other forms of explosive components, in the wake of the Boston Marathon Massacre. The bill would demand full Federal background checks of anyone seeking to purchase the minor explosive, similar to recent attempts by Congress to require full background checks on the sale of firearms.

http://www.examiner.com/article/senator ... n-massacre" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hi5 - STAT!!

expandspanos wrote:Problem, reaction, solution.

They're not just going for the 2nd Amendment... They're going for ingredients that could be used to make bullets even.. obvious sign that the gov. is preparing for something.

Senator to propose bill regulating black powder in wake of Boston Massacre

On April 17, New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg issued a statement to the public that he intends to propose a bill or amendment to regulate black powder, and other forms of explosive components, in the wake of the Boston Marathon Massacre. The bill would demand full Federal background checks of anyone seeking to purchase the minor explosive, similar to recent attempts by Congress to require full background checks on the sale of firearms.

http://www.examiner.com/article/senator ... n-massacre" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I'm curious, where do you draw the line? Is it okay to regulate enriched uranium or plutonium?

And one more thing: That's racist!!

BlueHen86 wrote:

expandspanos wrote:Problem, reaction, solution.

They're not just going for the 2nd Amendment... They're going for ingredients that could be used to make bullets even.. obvious sign that the gov. is preparing for something.

Senator to propose bill regulating black powder in wake of Boston Massacre

On April 17, New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg issued a statement to the public that he intends to propose a bill or amendment to regulate black powder, and other forms of explosive components, in the wake of the Boston Marathon Massacre. The bill would demand full Federal background checks of anyone seeking to purchase the minor explosive, similar to recent attempts by Congress to require full background checks on the sale of firearms.

http://www.examiner.com/article/senator ... n-massacre" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I'm curious, where do you draw the line? Is it okay to regulate enriched uranium or plutonium?

Well, of course, but powder is used by thousands of hunters to reload ammo. I reload shotgun shells for dove, turkey, and duck season, and for skeet. It's gotten so difficult to find regular sources of shells. They either limit you to a couple of boxes a day or are always out of supply. I don't want to have to worry about a background check every time I make an order.

BlueHen86 wrote:

expandspanos wrote:Problem, reaction, solution.

They're not just going for the 2nd Amendment... They're going for ingredients that could be used to make bullets even.. obvious sign that the gov. is preparing for something.

Senator to propose bill regulating black powder in wake of Boston Massacre

On April 17, New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg issued a statement to the public that he intends to propose a bill or amendment to regulate black powder, and other forms of explosive components, in the wake of the Boston Marathon Massacre. The bill would demand full Federal background checks of anyone seeking to purchase the minor explosive, similar to recent attempts by Congress to require full background checks on the sale of firearms.

http://www.examiner.com/article/senator ... n-massacre" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I'm curious, where do you draw the line? Is it okay to regulate enriched uranium or plutonium?

And where would you draw the line? Is it not ok to tear pieces of paper to make spitballs? Should we regulate sales of CO2 canisters for bb and pellet guns?

Sent from my HTC One V using Tapatalk 2

DSUrocks07 wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
I'm curious, where do you draw the line? Is it okay to regulate enriched uranium or plutonium?

And where would you draw the line? Is it not ok to tear pieces of paper to make spitballs? Should we regulate sales of CO2 canisters for bb and pellet guns?

Sent from my HTC One V using Tapatalk 2

I don't know, that's why I asked the question. But there is a huge difference between spitballs and explosive power. You do see that right?

Spitballs? Seriously?

death dealer wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
I'm curious, where do you draw the line? Is it okay to regulate enriched uranium or plutonium?

Well, of course, but powder is used by thousands of hunters to reload ammo. I reload shotgun shells for dove, turkey, and duck season, and for skeet. It's gotten so difficult to find regular sources of shells. They either limit you to a couple of boxes a day or are always out of supply. I don't want to have to worry about a background check every time I make an order.

So, you draw the line at the point where you are inconvenienced?

j/k. Admittedly, I don't know exactly what the existing laws are regarding black powder; enriched uranium and plutonium; dynamite; or any other explosive materials are. Perhaps the line has already been drawn. I was just having a little fun asking alcohol induced questions to out favorite conspiracy nut on a Friday night. In other words, I went fishing for spanos, instead I caught a bike riding dentist and a marlin. I'm going to stuff the marlin with spitballs (if they are still legal) and mount it on my wall.

I found the NFPA diamond for enriched spitballs:

BlueHen86 wrote:

death dealer wrote: Well, of course, but powder is used by thousands of hunters to reload ammo. I reload shotgun shells for dove, turkey, and duck season, and for skeet. It's gotten so difficult to find regular sources of shells. They either limit you to a couple of boxes a day or are always out of supply. I don't want to have to worry about a background check every time I make an order.

So, you draw the line at the point where you are inconvenienced?

j/k. Admittedly, I don't know exactly what the existing laws are regarding black powder; enriched uranium and plutonium; dynamite; or any other explosive materials are. Perhaps the line has already been drawn. I was just having a little fun asking alcohol induced questions to out favorite conspiracy nut on a Friday night. In other words, I went fishing for spanos, instead I caught a bike riding dentist and a marlin. I'm going to stuff the marlin with spitballs (if they are still legal) and mount it on my wall.

I'm pretty sure dynamite is pretty hard to come by, as well as uranium. And they should be of course. Powder is limited to 35 pounds per purchase, which is way more than enough for personal reloading use. You could probably build one hell of a bomb with that much powder, but unless you are a muslim extremist, why would you waste all that perfectly good powder on one shot?

No spitballs. Thats nasty.

Background checks for fertilizer. It's coming. Spandos, you know what i'm talkin' about.

Ibanez wrote:Background checks for fertilizer. It's coming. Spandos, you know what i'm talkin' about.

So, is that off the record or an official statement of intent?

death dealer wrote:

Ibanez wrote:Background checks for fertilizer. It's coming. Spandos, you know what i'm talkin' about.

So, is that off the record or an official statement of intent?

Off the record, of course.

BlueHen86 wrote:

DSUrocks07 wrote:
And where would you draw the line? Is it not ok to tear pieces of paper to make spitballs? Should we regulate sales of CO2 canisters for bb and pellet guns?

Sent from my HTC One V using Tapatalk 2

I don't know, that's why I asked the question. But there is a huge difference between spitballs and explosive power. You do see that right?

Spitballs? Seriously?

Hey.

Spitballs are the main weapon of choice for bullies nationwide. And bullying is WRONG!

Andddddd.....here's the bill. S.792 Requiring background checks for "explosive materials".

http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-con ... l/792/text

The text of the bill hasn't been released yet.

That is some bullshit.