FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=35317
clenz wrote:http://www.goddiscussion.com/109039/lib ... rn-videos/
Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2
...and Liberty fans still wonder why they won't be invited into the Sun Belt Conference.clenz wrote:http://www.goddiscussion.com/109039/lib ... rn-videos/
Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2
andy7171 wrote:Well in a round about way, watching porn does make me play with penis, when otherwise I wouldn't.
When you watch porn, do you want the guy to be soft or hard?andy7171 wrote:Well in a round about way, watching porn does make me play with penis, when otherwise I wouldn't.
I sure hope not!dbackjon wrote:andy7171 wrote:Well in a round about way, watching porn does make me play with penis, when otherwise I wouldn't.
So, masturbation is same-sex, so does that mean beating off is gay?
Which one?Ibanez wrote:When you watch porn, do you want the guy to be soft or hard?andy7171 wrote:Well in a round about way, watching porn does make me play with penis, when otherwise I wouldn't.
CAA Flagship wrote:Which one?Ibanez wrote: When you watch porn, do you want the guy to be soft or hard?
CAA Flagship wrote:Which one?Ibanez wrote: When you watch porn, do you want the guy to be soft or hard?
CID1990 wrote:If this is true then I'm the queerest motherfvcker in here
Sent from the center of the universe.
What does that even mean?JohnStOnge wrote:You know, I'm pretty skeptical about the idea that there is a cause and effect relationship between partaking in pornography and likelihood of ending up as a homosexual. On the other hand, I'm not seeing any real rebuttal of the hypothesis in that article.
JSO is doing "research" as we speakASUG8 wrote:What does that even mean?JohnStOnge wrote:You know, I'm pretty skeptical about the idea that there is a cause and effect relationship between partaking in pornography and likelihood of ending up as a homosexual. On the other hand, I'm not seeing any real rebuttal of the hypothesis in that article.
What he means was that the article was a sensationalistic "I can't believe she just said that!" rather than a serious piece of investigative journalism. If it were, the author would have looked at the prof's sources and found other sources that would counter her conclusions.ASUG8 wrote:What does that even mean?JohnStOnge wrote:You know, I'm pretty skeptical about the idea that there is a cause and effect relationship between partaking in pornography and likelihood of ending up as a homosexual. On the other hand, I'm not seeing any real rebuttal of the hypothesis in that article.
Yes. That's pretty much it. The author talked about her citing some other guy who talked about how interfering with insects with a certain source of stimulation altered the normal course of sexual behavior. And he talked about the other author comparing that source of stimulation to pornography. He did nothing at all to rebut any of that. As I read it I was expecting him to maybe contend that when the Liberty professor cited the other guy she misrepresented him. But he didn't.What he means was that the article was a sensationalistic "I can't believe she just said that!" rather than a serious piece of investigative journalism. If it were, the author would have looked at the prof's sources and found other sources that would counter her conclusions.
No, clenz. You're taking that a step too far. This is the opinion of ONE professor, NOT the school's position. The school's position on homosexuality does NOT address causes. This is one of the things that happens when you actually allow academic freedom instead of firing tenured professors because they don't agree with someone else's position on the topic, as happens WAY too often regarding Evolution.clenz wrote:This is what your school...your religion...is professing.
Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2
So THIS is the official position of Columbia University?Columbia Assistant Anthro Prof Nicholas De Genova wrote:The only true heroes are those who find ways that help defeat the U.S. military. I personally would like to see a million Mogadishus.
if Columbia's founder notorious for being a bigot that hated blacks, gays, non-protestants, etc... and openly wished ill will in them and then started his university to further those beliefs?SuperHornet wrote:So THIS is the official position of Columbia University?Columbia Assistant Anthro Prof Nicholas De Genova wrote:The only true heroes are those who find ways that help defeat the U.S. military. I personally would like to see a million Mogadishus.
http://forums.anandtech.com/archive/ind ... 24275.html