Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Cap'n, no more posts denigrating religion. We've ruined cs.com.

D1B wrote:Cap'n, no more posts denigrating religion. We've ruined cs.com.

You're also not allowed to talk about red turf.

kalm wrote:

D1B wrote:Cap'n, no more posts denigrating religion. We've ruined cs.com.

You're also not allowed to talk about red turf.

Or tampons!

Atheism and religion both require faith. That's why I reject both.

CitadelGrad wrote:Atheism and religion both require faith. That's why I reject both.

Nihilist?

CitadelGrad wrote:Atheism and religion both require faith. That's why I reject both.

Everything requires faith you moron. Religion requires faith in dogma.

D1B wrote:

CitadelGrad wrote:Atheism and religion both require faith. That's why I reject both.

Everything requires faith you moron. Religion requires faith in dogma.

Mathematics doesn't require faith.

The most arrogant and dogmatic atheists usually are not only not scientists, but not overly scientifically literate. I can usually school them on subjects like evolution and abiogenesis. They're the same fools that think skepticism about anthropogenic climate change and the saturated fat-heart disease hypothesis is the same as denying that gravity exists.

Case in point, a girl I once dated who was a proud atheist would get all up on a high horse about so many people being scientifically ignorant because of their opinions on evolution and climate change. This was a person who (1) would make fun of me for not drinking but told me I shouldn't eat cheese because it's "bacteria poop" and (2) once said she thought the government should ban the building of nuclear power plants next to large bodies of water.

CitadelGrad wrote:

D1B wrote:
Everything requires faith you moron. Religion requires faith in dogma.

Mathematics doesn't require faith.

Wanna bet, Ass Muncher?

Pwns wrote:The most arrogant and dogmatic atheists usually are not only not scientists, but not overly scientifically literate. I can usually school them on subjects like evolution and abiogenesis. They're the same fools that think skepticism about anthropogenic climate change and the saturated fat-heart disease hypothesis is the same as denying that gravity exists.

Case in point, a girl I once dated who was a proud atheist would get all up on a high horse about so many people being scientifically ignorant because of their opinions on evolution and climate change. This was a person who (1) would make fun of me for not drinking but told me I shouldn't eat cheese because it's "bacteria poop" and (2) once said she thought the government should ban the building of nuclear power plants next to large bodies of water.

Lost all beleivability right there.

D1B wrote:

CitadelGrad wrote:
Mathematics doesn't require faith.

Wanna bet, Ass Muncher?

He's right. Math is a set of axioms and all things that logically follow from those axioms. Math is the only subject where it's correct to say that you "prove" something. We know that there are infinitely many prime numbers because otherwise it would be impossible to factor the product of all of the primes with one added to it. That's using pure logic and not just using empirical evidence to make a guess.

Pwns wrote:

D1B wrote:

Wanna bet, Ass Muncher?

He's right. Math is a set of axioms and all things that logically follow from those axioms. Math is the only subject where it's correct to say that you "prove" something. We know that there are infinitely many prime numbers because otherwise it would be impossible to factor the product of all of the primes with one added to it. That's using pure logic and not just using empirical evidence to make a guess.

Yeah, faith in logic.

kalm wrote:

D1B wrote:Cap'n, no more posts denigrating religion. We've ruined cs.com.

You're also not allowed to talk about red turf.

Red turf is my favorite! Blond is a distant second. Right in front of that fine downy Asian turf.

Math is the only subject where it's correct to say that you "prove" something.

I don't think that's true. There are many things that can be proven. For instance: I can prove that I am between 6'0" and 6'2" in height. Unequivocally. It can be proven that gasoline can be used for locomotion. So on and so forth.

JohnStOnge wrote:

Math is the only subject where it's correct to say that you "prove" something.

I don't think that's true. There are many things that can be proven. For instance: I can prove that I am between 6'0" and 6'2" in height. Unequivocally. It can be proven that gasoline can be used for locomotion. So on and so forth.

But that's all just mathematics in the end. Fail.