Maryland and the Death Penalty
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:11 am
Gov O'Malley wants to eliminate it. Thoughts from our Mary-landers?
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=34480
I'm not a Mary-lander, though I married into a family with many Mary-landers. For what it's worth, I agree with O'Malley.dbackjon wrote:Gov O'Malley wants to eliminate it. Thoughts from our Mary-landers?
Yeah, b/c the death penalty is such a deterrent.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:I think he is a pussy and should be fired for incompetency.
I am opposed to capital punishment, so I would support the Gov on this one.dbackjon wrote:Gov O'Malley wants to eliminate it. Thoughts from our Mary-landers?
Are you opposed on the grounds that it's murder, it's not a deterrent or both?89Hen wrote:I am opposed to capital punishment, so I would support the Gov on this one.dbackjon wrote:Gov O'Malley wants to eliminate it. Thoughts from our Mary-landers?
I dont care if it deters or not.Ibanez wrote:Yeah, b/c the death penalty is such a deterrent.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:I think he is a pussy and should be fired for incompetency.
Both. BTW, I used to be a proponent of it.Ibanez wrote:Are you opposed on the grounds that it's murder, it's not a deterrent or both?89Hen wrote: I am opposed to capital punishment, so I would support the Gov on this one.
What changed your outlook?89Hen wrote:Both. BTW, I used to be a proponent of it.Ibanez wrote:
Are you opposed on the grounds that it's murder, it's not a deterrent or both?
Not exactly sure what you mean here unless you are saying you think more crimes should carry the death penalty. I seriously doubt there are any criminals convicted of serious enough crimes to consider the death penalty that ever get out of jail.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:I dont care if it deters or not.Ibanez wrote: Yeah, b/c the death penalty is such a deterrent.
I am done with the left letting people out of prison that 99% of the time harm other people. You guys have to wash the blood off your hands.
Compassion with age. Hope that doesn't hurt my curmudgeon status.Ibanez wrote:What changed your outlook?89Hen wrote: Both. BTW, I used to be a proponent of it.
You're so screwed....your image is tainted.89Hen wrote:Compassion with age. Hope that doesn't hurt my curmudgeon status.Ibanez wrote: What changed your outlook?
Ibanez wrote:You're so screwed....your image is tainted.89Hen wrote: Compassion with age. Hope that doesn't hurt my curmudgeon status.
^^This.89Hen wrote:Both. BTW, I used to be a proponent of it.Ibanez wrote:
Are you opposed on the grounds that it's murder, it's not a deterrent or both?
They know not to come out in the day. The mounted are out in full force.Grizalltheway wrote:So how many people get gunned down during the parade today?
Screaming Bagels mom works for the po po?andy7171 wrote:They know not to come out in the day. The mounted are out in full force.Grizalltheway wrote:So how many people get gunned down during the parade today?
It is an absolute deterrent that prevents that particular person from committing another crime.Ibanez wrote:Yeah, b/c the death penalty is such a deterrent.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:I think he is a pussy and should be fired for incompetency.
Yeah, it has nothing to do with the people living in each.andy7171 wrote:Well as far as the death penalty is concerned as a deterrant. Baltimore County prosecutors push hard for the death penalty, murder rate is low. Baltimore City prosecutors refuse to use the death penalty, murder rate is top 3 in the country?
I was on a jury that convicted a guy of murder and sentenced him to death - this was after he had already been convicted and sentenced to death for two other murders for which they had enough evidence. He said himself he may have killed up to 8 people.Pwns wrote:The only people I support the death penalty for are those who commit crimes with absolutely no (I mean not even an infintecimal) chance of false conviction (e.g. Jared Loughner). Since those people are usually deemed not fit to stand trial, I don't have a problem with it.
Exactly. I think the only way for it to be a truly effective deterrent is to have a Saudi Arabia-style, cut-your-head-off-at-dawn system.ASUG8 wrote:I was on a jury that convicted a guy of murder and sentenced him to death - this was after he had already been convicted and sentenced to death for two other murders for which they had enough evidence. He said himself he may have killed up to 8 people.Pwns wrote:The only people I support the death penalty for are those who commit crimes with absolutely no (I mean not even an infintecimal) chance of false conviction (e.g. Jared Loughner). Since those people are usually deemed not fit to stand trial, I don't have a problem with it.
That was 1996, in North Carolina for murders committed in 1990 or before. And he's still in jail with no date set. Not too much of a deterrent if you know you'll have plenty of time to exhaust appeals
This is pretty much where I stand. It's known that we have executed innocent people in this country. That's a terrible tragedy.Pwns wrote:The only people I support the death penalty for are those who commit crimes with absolutely no (I mean not even an infintecimal) chance of false conviction (e.g. Jared Loughner). Since those people are usually deemed not fit to stand trial, I don't have a problem with it.
Yeah, we should model our justice system after Saudi Arabia.Grizalltheway wrote:Exactly. I think the only way for it to be a truly effective deterrent is to have a Saudi Arabia-style, cut-your-head-off-at-dawn system.