Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

From the online edition (now the ONLY edition) of Newsweek:

Greatest President since Lincoln.

Thank you, President Obama, for saving our nation from the conks.

Yes, how will women save Europe?


I assume that is what you are referring to .

That's the stupidest statement EVER. Wouldn't expect anything less from a member of the Troll Brothers.



While I was clearly not referring to THAT, Jon, Thatcher did a pretty good job....

dbackjon wrote:Yes, how will women save Europe?


I assume that is what you are referring to .

By being hot and blonde.

So you think it's disgusting that they are asking if he can deliver? Like you fully expect him to deliver without any problems??

Who in their right mind expects great things out of Obama's second term???

That cover screams Soviet Union.

Second Coming huh? Christ laughs at Obama. May we all be ready for the REAL Second Coming.

psychoCAT wrote:Second Coming huh? Christ laughs at Obama. May we all be ready for the REAL Second Coming.

Christ is a smart ass?

SuperHornet wrote:From the online edition (now the ONLY edition) of Newsweek:

IMO, it's a brilliant jab at conks like Super and Hannity who love to talk about the "Anointed One" and the "Messiah".

I keep hitting the button in the bottom left corner but the video does not play. Thanks Obama.

D1B wrote:Greatest President since Lincoln.

Thank you, President Obama, for saving our nation from the conks.

Nice chain jerk. I know you know better. You're too smart not to realize that this guy is a disaster.

bluehenbillk wrote:Who in their right mind expects great things out of Obama's second term???

Expecting him to "deliver" is like expecting Dana Carvey to step in as quarterback in a Super Bowl and deliver. This is the most unqualified President of our lifetimes. And If you're thinking George W. Bush: Yes, George W. Bush was way more qualified to be President than Obama is.

Plus he's got totally the wrong philosophy of government. Again: He is a disaster.

JohnStOnge wrote:

bluehenbillk wrote:Who in their right mind expects great things out of Obama's second term???

Expecting him to "deliver" is like expecting Dana Carvey to step in as quarterback in a Super Bowl and deliver. This is the most unqualified President of our lifetimes. And If you're thinking George W. Bush: Yes, George W. Bush was way more qualified to be President than Obama is.

Plus he's got totally the wrong philosophy of government. Again: He is a disaster.

JohnStOnge wrote:

bluehenbillk wrote:Who in their right mind expects great things out of Obama's second term???

Expecting him to "deliver" is like expecting Dana Carvey to step in as quarterback in a Super Bowl and deliver. This is the most unqualified President of our lifetimes. And If you're thinking George W. Bush: Yes, George W. Bush was way more qualified to be President than Obama is.

Plus he's got totally the wrong philosophy of government. Again: He is a disaster.

Is that George "Dead or Alive" Bush of whom you speak? Ask Osama bin Laden who is more qualified.

Is that George "Dead or Alive" Bush of whom you speak? Ask Osama bin Laden who is more qualified.

You have got to be kidding. Do you honestly think Obama is the reason our military/intelligence complex got Bin Laden? C'mon man.

George W. Bush was the Governor of a the second most populated State before he was President and by all accounts was very successful in the job of being Governor. He held other executive jobs prior to that as well. By any reasonable standard he was WAY more qualified than Obama was to be Chief Executive of the Executive Branch of Government than Obama was. Obama had absolutely NO executive experience prior to becoming President.

I mean think about Obama's background and his previous experience. He has no business being in this position. He's totally unqualified and he's got a totally wrong world view. It's absolutely ridiculous that this guy is President of the United States and if it wasn't so serious that we've got a totally unqualified person in that position it would be funny.

But you can't say that, JSO. The logical extension of your argument is that the libs' favorite "whack job" is more qualified to be President than Obama. And THAT is unforgivable. Therefore, they will do all they can to shut you up, including dropping F-bombs on you.

Spoiler: show

And, yes, you're correct. You just can't say it in their presence, or they'll crap on you.

JohnStOnge wrote:

bluehenbillk wrote:Who in their right mind expects great things out of Obama's second term???

Expecting him to "deliver" is like expecting Dana Carvey to step in as quarterback in a Super Bowl and deliver. This is the most unqualified President of our lifetimes. And If you're thinking George W. Bush: Yes, George W. Bush was way more qualified to be President than Obama is.

Plus he's got totally the wrong philosophy of government. Again: He is a disaster.

W was the worst president we ever had. Ever. Seriously, William Henry Harrison was 1000x better.

There is a lot of fail in this thread. Since HI54UNI is not available, he has bestowed upon me to carry his torch until tomorrow.


I give you this

JohnStOnge wrote:

bluehenbillk wrote:Who in their right mind expects great things out of Obama's second term???

Expecting him to "deliver" is like expecting Dana Carvey to step in as quarterback in a Super Bowl and deliver. This is the most unqualified President of our lifetimes. And If you're thinking George W. Bush: Yes, George W. Bush was way more qualified to be President than Obama is.

Plus he's got totally the wrong philosophy of government. Again: He is a disaster.

By qualified, what do you mean? If by the Constitution, then he's qualified. What does "qualified' mean to become POTUS to you???

Previous government executive experience.

I pick this one:

Beardown wrote:By qualified, what do you mean? If by the Constitution, then he's qualified. What does "qualified' mean to become POTUS to you???

Well..if truth be known I don't think a President has to be all that technically qualified. I think our government is largely on autopilot when it comes to the day to day operations. The Bureaucracies do their thing year in and year out and who is President and who is in Congress really doesn't make all that much difference in terms of functioning. A President, to me, is more of a figurehead than anything else. What's important, I think, is the President's philosophical outlook. That can make a difference in doing something like, for instance, unleashing the Hellions at the EPA upon the coal industry. President doesn't have to be qualified to do anything except say, "Go get 'em."

BUT...to the extent that there is qualification...yes I think Obama was the least qualified President of our lifetime going in. I mean, really, what did the guy do prior to being elected the first time? Seriously. Take the pretty face and the radio voice out of the equation. Visualize just looking at a resume listing previous experience. Do you really think you'd just look at what Obama had done prior to being elected the first time and think, "This guy is qualified to be President of the United States?"

W was the worst president we ever had. Ever. Seriously, William Henry Harrison was 1000x better.

That can't be true because all you have to do is go to the next guy to find a worse one. What Obama is facilitating is going to do way more long term damage to the United States than anything Bush did.

I also do not think Obama has had to deal with as difficult a set of circumstances as Bush did. People say what happened in 2008 was the worst economy since the Great Depression but I think that's total nonsense. I was alive in my young adult years in the late 70s and it was a LOT worse. I guess it depends on what parameters you're looking at but saying what Obama inherited was worse than what things were like then is absurd.

Obama didn't have to decide what to do in response to the 9/11 attacks. Obama did not have to deal with the Katrina aftermath. And, no, the Sandy aftermath is not as bad. It's not the same crisis level and not as difficult a situation to deal with. Nowhere close. Katrina remains the worst natural disaster in this country's history by far. They weren't just dealing with people having their houses ruined and being uncomfortable for a while. They were having to quickly rescue tens of thousands of people from imminent risk of death, stranded without food or drinkable water on rooftops and such, while the media was focusing on a relatively small number of people in the Superdome area who had it relatively good compared to a lot of others. There was a time crunch such that thousands of people were going to die of thirst and/or exposure if they didn't get to them. Much more urgency, much more of an emergency aspect, much more difficult to deal with.