Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

The entire Sandy Hook Shooting event wreaks to high heaven. The initial reports that Adam Lanza got in a confrontation at the school have been recanted (apparently totally made up). The initial. reports that Adam Lanza attended Sandy Hook school, and his mother was a teacher there have now been completely recanted.

The story about which guns were used has been completely changed time and time again (it should be easy enough to figure this out) 4 handguns.. or a long gun? and what kind of gun was left in the car trunk- it appears to be a shotgun.. never mentioned.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHvVqqim_T0[/youtube]

There has been no video evidence released to the public, even though the school just invested in a surveillance system- Why are we relying on eyewitness accounts if there is video evidence?

Adam Lanza- the main suspect who's "scary black and white" image is shown over and over again to the public doesn't have ANY record since 2009.. There isn't one picture of him, any online fingerprint (even though he's supposedly a computer geek) and his hard drive is conveniently "smashed beyond retrieval."

We have not seen ONE image from inside the school- and now the public is being "primed" for the school to be completely demolished- removing any evidence of the cameras, or future discourse on the ridiculousness of this event. (kind of like 9/11's evidence being shipped to China). Even Columbine was left standing.

Conflicting reports that Adam Lanza lived in a "windowless basement full of posters of tanks and guns" have clashed with reports that he "lived in two very clean bedrooms out of the 5 bedroom home."

All the "eyewitness" testimony is very strange- especially that given by Gene Rosen, the "Medical examiner" Wayne Carver, and the School Nurse Sally Cox.

None of the neighbors of the Lanza's have ever been allowed into Nancy's home- and most of the neighbors didn't even apparently know who the family was and most neighbors have not seen Adam Lanza for the last few years.

The Danbury Hospital was on "lock down" and was ready for a flood of shot people- but amazingly only 3 people ever were taken to the hospital, and a man who shows up to the hospital shortly after says already they were saying 27 people had died- This is the same hospital where 2 people apparently died, so how could this death toll have been announced so quickly?

Gene Rosen claiming he "saw the death toll list" on the day of the shooting (the 24th of December) when this is impossible, because it wasn't released until the 26th.

The R.I.P. Victoria Soto page was created on December 10th, 4 days before the shooting, and the United Way donation pages were created on December 13th- 3 days before the shooting. The United Way has now been put in charge of directing who and where the money goes by appointing Joe Lieberman in charge of the fund.

------------

Prove me wrong: Provide ONE image of an injured child, person in a stretcher, surveillance video, camera phone video, or someone with an injury and I will NEVER post about this subject again.

If only you were there that day.

spandos.

You got nothing new
You never had nothing new
You'll never have nothing new




Just a Fred Phelps wannabe without the stones to come out into the daylight, spandos.

Somebody needs to shoot up Spandos' hometown, maybe his kids school.

Then we can say it didn't happen.

bluehenbillk wrote:Somebody needs to shoot up Spandos' hometown, maybe his kids school.

Then we can say it didn't happen.

That's the SECOND time you've wished this on someone.

That's the only thing some people understand unfortunately. Can't waste my time talking to brick walls.

bluehenbillk wrote:That's the only thing some people understand unfortunately. Can't waste my time talking to brick walls.

Sayeth the brick wall...



Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2

Waiting for HI54UNI to ride, er, jiggle to the recue of this thread!

It's amazing to me how quickly people want to roll over and give up the rights their ancestors died to protect over an event that has literally zero proof.

expandspanos wrote:an event that has literally zero proof.

It's amazing how great your standard of proof is for this event... and how low your standard of evidence is for counter theories.

expandspanos wrote:It's amazing to me how quickly people want to roll over and give up the rights their ancestors died to protect over an event that has literally zero proof.

The families who burried their kids aren't proof

Sent from the nexus of the universe

expandspanos wrote:It's amazing to me how quickly people want to roll over and give up the rights their ancestors died to protect over an event that has literally zero proof.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. You got nothing, just like you always have.

expandspanos wrote:It's amazing to me how quickly people want to roll over and give up the rights their ancestors died to protect over an event that has literally zero proof.

What proof would satisfy you? What would you like to see?

I hope that, with threads like this, that you are just trolling here, otherwise you are a complete kook.

Hey spanos -

Don't let your mom catch you spanking it to this

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2BnqP6E ... Q&index=18[/youtube]

The tatoo on her ass, is that part of a conspiracy? It kind of looks like the mark of the Masons or the Stonecutters.

HI54UNI wrote:

God bless you, my son!

If this was all hoax wouldn't they have all the facts straight before the damn thing even happened?

HI54UNI wrote:The tatoo on her ass, is that part of a conspiracy? It kind of looks like the mark of the Masons or the Stonecutters.

You never disappoint my man...never.

griz37 wrote:If this was all hoax wouldn't they have all the facts straight before the damn thing even happened?

Not exactly- as certain things happen that can't account for someone shows up that isn't supposed to be there, someone sees something- a medical examiner starts acting like a nutso-drunk who you thought would keep his cool.

It's not like producing a movie where you could simply write a script- people do unpredictable things that aren't accounted for, and during the event, things happen which are unexpected.

That's when the story starts to wreak to high-heaven, like the Sandyhoax does.

They have a story- "The Gunman used the AR-15 to shoot the kids" then someone involved accidentally leaves the long rifle in the trunk of the car.. Then you have to change the story to "the gunman used 4 firearms"

Truth of the matter is- it should be very easy to see exactly which firearms were used by the gunman- they should be laying right next to his dead body inside the school.

Where's the video evidence? Media hasn't been asking about that much have they?