Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Gotta be, since the court deems it o.k. to...

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2012/12/2 ... e-workers/








****ing unbelievable.

Door prize to whoever posts the pic...

It's a curse some of us must bear.


And fucking stupid decsion.

Don't see how you can argue sex discrimination here, and there is no legal protections for discrimination based on looks, so I don't see the case you can make here.

She'll be all right, though. She is a young and attractive female - no one has it easier in life.

Pwns wrote:Don't see how you can argue sex discrimination here...

Say what?

But for her gender, she wouldn't have lost her job.

Had she been an "irresistable male", her employer wouldn't have terminated her.

What part of this is ambiguous?

travelinman67 wrote:

Pwns wrote:Don't see how you can argue sex discrimination here...

Say what?

But for her gender, she wouldn't have lost her job.

Had she been an "irresistable male", her employer wouldn't have terminated her.

What part of this is ambiguous?

If she had been an unattractive female she would not have lost her job. It's not discrimination based on sex, it is discrimination based on looks.

Pwns wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:
Say what?

But for her gender, she wouldn't have lost her job.

Had she been an "irresistable male", her employer wouldn't have terminated her.

What part of this is ambiguous?

If she had been an unattractive female she would not have lost her job. It's not discrimination based on sex, it is discrimination based on looks.

But if the employer has a "thing" for flat-chested, heavily-acne'd, overweight, greasy skinned, high-pitch voiced women, under your criteria, this woman's appearance makes her termination justifiable?

Can an employer now say, "Due to your recent addition of full-body tattoos, fifty facial piercings, and refusal to shave your pits, even though your work is exemplary and without blemish, I'm firing your for cause because I'm sexually aroused by trashy, bohemian women." ?

This would make finding suitable assistants for Cappy virtually impossible.

JoltinJoe wrote:

Aha! The Papal Horndog appeareth!

Vidav wrote:

Thanks, Vid! I think that gal is semi hot.

Seems like Dr. Knight's wife is the one makin' all the noise! I wonder what she look's like...Vid?

Like I posted on FB. This is exactly why my wife stays at home. Too hot. 5'11", Russian heritage. I don't need to say anymore.

SeattleGriz wrote:Like I posted on FB. This is exactly why my wife stays at home. Too hot. 5'11", Russian heritage. I don't need to say anymore.

SeattleGriz wrote:Like I posted on FB. This is exactly why my wife stays at home. Too hot. 5'11", Russian heritage. I don't need to say anymore.

No, but it has been a while since you posted any pics.

Pwns wrote:Don't see how you can argue sex discrimination here, and there is no legal protections for discrimination based on looks, so I don't see the case you can make here.

She'll be all right, though. She is a young and attractive female - no one has it easier in life.

This.

Vidav wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:Like I posted on FB. This is exactly why my wife stays at home. Too hot. 5'11", Russian heritage. I don't need to say anymore.

Lithuanian actually. Cleets tried to hump her leg. Had to shake a can of pennies at him to scare him off.

travelinman67 wrote:

Pwns wrote:
If she had been an unattractive female she would not have lost her job. It's not discrimination based on sex, it is discrimination based on looks.

But if the employer has a "thing" for flat-chested, heavily-acne'd, overweight, greasy skinned, high-pitch voiced women, under your criteria, this woman's appearance makes her termination justifiable?

Can an employer now say, "Due to your recent addition of full-body tattoos, fifty facial piercings, and refusal to shave your pits, even though your work is exemplary and without blemish, I'm firing your for cause because I'm sexually aroused by trashy, bohemian women." ?

This would make finding suitable assistants for Cappy virtually impossible.

What if the employer is gay?

You should not have to give a reason for firing a person...just do it.

Love is blind.