Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

So, some o' you cunts worship Reagan, huh?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Mozote_massacre" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The El Mozote Massacre took place in and around the village of El Mozote, in Morazán department, El Salvador, on December 11, 1981, when Salvadoran armed forces killed more than 800 civilians in an anti-guerrilla campaign[1] during the Salvadoran Civil War.

The massacre was first reported in the US by New York Times and Washington Post reporters who had independently reached the scene, and came during a congressional debate over whether to continue military aid to the Salvadoran armed forces. Following a "certification" by the administration of US President Ronald Reagan that no massacre had taken place and that Salvadoran forces were working to respect human rights, the Democratic-controlled Congress agreed to continue aid.

Cocksucker lied, of course.


Early the next morning, the soldiers reassembled the entire village in the square. They separated the men from the women and children and locked them in separate groups in the church, the convent, and various houses.[7]

During the morning, they proceeded to interrogate, torture, and execute the men in several locations.[8] Around noon, they began taking the women and older girls in groups, separating them from their children and machine gunning them after raping them.[9] Girls as young as 10 were raped, with soldiers reportedly heard bragging how they especially liked the twelve-year-old girls.[10] Finally, they killed the children at first by slitting their throats then by hanging them from trees, with one child as young as two years old.[11] After killing the entire population, the soldiers set fire to the buildings.

(Reminder, the above is Reagan's gig....)



The soldiers remained in El Mozote that night but the next day went to the village of Los Toriles, some 2 km away and carried out a further massacre. Men, women and children were taken from their homes, lined up, robbed and shot and their homes then set ablaze.[12]

"What made the Morazan massacre stories so threatening was that they repudiated the fundamental moral claim that undergirded US policy. They suggested that what the United States was supporting in Central America was not democracy but repression. They therefore threatened to shift the political debate from means to ends, from how best to combat the supposed Communist threat—send US troops or merely US aid?—to why the United States was backing state terrorism in the first place."[22]


That asshole, Reagan, was the Osama bin Laden of his time. You dumbass Conks gotta read your history instead of trusting what Rove and Limbaugh say about your idols. Oh, and fuck off.

Wanted to repeat this special little part and have you Conks take a long look at YOUR daughters. Then, think about Reagan.



Around noon, they began taking the women and older girls in groups, separating them from their children and machine gunning them after raping them. Girls as young as 10 were raped, with soldiers reportedly heard bragging how they especially liked the twelve-year-old girls. Finally, they killed the children at first by slitting their throats then by hanging them from trees, with one child as young as two years old. After killing the entire population, the soldiers set fire to the buildings.

There's lots of blood on FDR's hands, Truman's hands, Eisenhower's hands, Kennedy's hands, Johnson's hands, Nixon's hands, Carter's hands, Bush's hands, Clinton's hands Bush II's hands and Obama's hands.

AZGrizFan wrote:There's lots of blood on FDR's hands, Truman's hands, Eisenhower's hands, Kennedy's hands, Johnson's hands, Nixon's hands, Carter's hands, Bush's hands, Clinton's hands Bush II's hands and Obama's hands.

Don't forget Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Grant (to name a few)

Ibanez wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:There's lots of blood on FDR's hands, Truman's hands, Eisenhower's hands, Kennedy's hands, Johnson's hands, Nixon's hands, Carter's hands, Bush's hands, Clinton's hands Bush II's hands and Obama's hands.

Don't forget Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Grant (to name a few)

I was just thinking of the presidents since WWII.

The only good communist is a dead communist.

CitadelGrad wrote:The only good communist is a dead communist.

That is precisely the idiocy that has us right where we are today...
But I'm guessing you were kinda being sarcastic

Cap, it's Wikipedia. It could be true. But you're going to have to find another source. The problems with Wikipedia are well known. It's OK to use it for a starting point. But in order to provide a credible reference...especially when you're dealing with something inflamatory...you need to find something else.

Here you go:

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/journalism/ ... ozote.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You are apparently correct in saying the massacres occurred. But that is a much better reference.

Wonder when Cappy is going to post something about the women and children Obama is murdering with drones.

You know, because providing children daily shredded limbs and death from above while claiming all casualties as "combatants" really cleanses the soul.

And then there's the oppressed people of Bahrain...just ignore those reports of torture. And we are giving billions to Egypt and the Muslin Brotherhood's rape squads.

Forward...whether they want it or not (because deep down, they all really want it).

JohnStOnge wrote:Cap, it's Wikipedia. It could be true. But you're going to have to find another source. The problems with Wikipedia are well known. It's OK to use it for a starting point. But in order to provide a credible reference...especially when you're dealing with something inflamatory...you need to find something else.

You're still falling for his stale bait? The Hanson brothers don't care about facts, they are both trolls who's schtick became old around 2004. Seem like nice guys in person, but their internet personas are tired.

89Hen wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:Cap, it's Wikipedia. It could be true. But you're going to have to find another source. The problems with Wikipedia are well known. It's OK to use it for a starting point. But in order to provide a credible reference...especially when you're dealing with something inflamatory...you need to find something else.

You're still falling for his stale bait? The Hanson brothers don't care about facts, they are both trolls who's schtick became old around 2004. Seem like nice guys in person, but their internet personas are tired.

And you're a barrel of laughs.

You're a smug Gil Dobie.

How pathetic.

D1B wrote:

89Hen wrote: You're still falling for his stale bait? The Hanson brothers don't care about facts, they are both trolls who's schtick became old around 2004. Seem like nice guys in person, but their internet personas are tired.

And you're a barrel of laughs.

You're a smug Gil Dobie.

How pathetic.

Dead stone-cold nuts-on about Hen. Used to be a poster of some substance years ago. Now, he's about as relevant as Ralph. Reduced to one line (one word) quips with no beef in anything. Been slapped around here too much.

Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Tokyo.


It's all relative.