Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

God bless Barack Obama!

Greatest president of our lives.

D1B wrote:God bless Barack Obama!

Greatest president of our lives.

Your only lunch choices in the future:

CAA Flagship wrote:

D1B wrote:God bless Barack Obama!

Greatest president of our lives.

Your only lunch choices in the future:

Because Obama has played the China card so differently or the conks didn't heavily contribute to the debt, or the conks have been SO protectionist when it comes to trade. Really, you guys need to get some new material.

Presidents in last century who won 60%+ of popular vote on their reelection bid...

89Hen wrote:Presidents in last century who won 60%+ of popular vote on their reelection bid...

Two of the smartest presidents we ever had.

BTW, for all you political junkies, if you've never seen the move Frost Nixon, you should. It's really good.

kalm wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote: Your only lunch choices in the future:

Because Obama has played the China card so differently or the conks didn't heavily contribute to the debt, or the conks have been SO protectionist when it comes to trade. Really, you guys need to get some new material.

Obama admin just imposed stiff tariffs on Chinese-made solar panels. Who knows, Solyndra might not have bitten the dust if Bush had had the balls to do the same.

How many of those presidents received 10 million fewer votes in their second election than they did in their first?

I can think of only one: The Magic Negro.

Not exactly re-elected with a ringing endorsement.

kalm wrote: Because Obama has played the China card so differently or the conks didn't heavily contribute to the debt, or the conks have been SO protectionist when it comes to trade. Really, you guys need to get some new material.

Well, the Chinks love a weak dollar, and Obama with his boy in the Treasury are doing their best to nuke it with QE3. Since QE1 and QE2 worked so well, why not?

CitadelGrad wrote:How many of those presidents received 10 million fewer votes in their second election than they did in their first?

I can think of only one: The Magic Negro.

Not exactly re-elected with a ringing endorsement.

He still needs to work on the Redneck vote..............lol

Baldy wrote:

kalm wrote: Because Obama has played the China card so differently or the conks didn't heavily contribute to the debt, or the conks have been SO protectionist when it comes to trade. Really, you guys need to get some new material.

Well, the Chinks love a weak dollar, and Obama with his boy in the Treasury are doing their best to nuke it with QE3. Since QE1 and QE2 worked so well, why not?

Who still talks like this???

mrklean wrote:

Baldy wrote: Well, the Chinks love a weak dollar, and Obama with his boy in the Treasury are doing their best to nuke it with QE3. Since QE1 and QE2 worked so well, why not?

Who still talks like this???

Conks.

Grizalltheway wrote:

mrklean wrote:
Who still talks like this???

Conks.

Sad thing about it, they don't think they are doing anything wrong...........

mrklean wrote:

Baldy wrote: Well, the Chinks love a weak dollar, and Obama with his boy in the Treasury are doing their best to nuke it with QE3. Since QE1 and QE2 worked so well, why not?

Who still talks like this???

Why? Are you a Chink?

mrklean wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:
Conks.

Sad thing about it, they don't think they are doing anything wrong...........

Interesting...it doesn't seem to bother you and Jizzfan when Cappy and D1B regularly drop the N-bomb.

CitadelGrad wrote:How many of those presidents received 10 million fewer votes in their second election than they did in their first?

I can think of only one: The Magic Negro.

Not exactly re-elected with a ringing endorsement.

I think that is completely irrelevant. The only thing that matters is the electoral college. The GOP made gains there when Indiana and North Carolina switched from Dem in 2008 to Rep in 2012.

The total votes mean nothing. I'm sure Obama could have picked up more votes in Texas and Romney could have picked up more votes in California, but why bother. There were only about 9 states up for grabs, the vote totals from the other 41 mean nothing.

Skjellyfetti wrote:

BASTARD!

Skjellyfetti wrote:

WANKER!

Skjellyfetti wrote:

TWAT!

Skjellyfetti wrote:

COONT!

Baldy wrote:

mrklean wrote:
Sad thing about it, they don't think they are doing anything wrong...........

Interesting...it doesn't seem to bother you and Jizzfan when Cappy and D1B regularly drop the N-bomb.

You see, Baldy, people love us and we have street cred. You lack both.

When we use it, it's appropriate satire. When you drop, it's vitriol from a hateful conk who thinks poor people and blacks are the root of all America's problems.

CitadelGrad wrote:How many of those presidents received 10 million fewer votes in their second election than they did in their first?

I can think of only one: The Magic Negro.

Not exactly re-elected with a ringing endorsement.

Lame Rushannity talking point.

You do realize there are millions of votes yet to be counted?

Even your pea-brain should understand that in NJ/NY/CT alone, 1.5 million fewer votes were cast this year, than in 2008 - mostly Democratic votes not cast because of Sandy.

Fucking Racist Idiot.

D1B wrote:

Baldy wrote: Interesting...it doesn't seem to bother you and Jizzfan when Cappy and D1B regularly drop the N-bomb.

You see, Baldy, people love us and we have street cred. You lack both.

When we use it, it's appropriate satire. When you drop, it's vitriol from a hateful conk who thinks poor people and blacks are the root of all America's problems.

Street cred in pasty white bread Wisconsin.

That's the problem, D. You and the people who think like you are great at pointing fingers and putting labels on everyone and everything...the champions of hyphenated Americanism. The root of America's problems aren't blacks or illegals, the poor, etc. but it is the people who share the same world view as you. You will never ever understand, but there is a clear difference.

dbackjon wrote:

CitadelGrad wrote:How many of those presidents received 10 million fewer votes in their second election than they did in their first?

I can think of only one: The Magic Negro.

Not exactly re-elected with a ringing endorsement.

Lame Rushannity talking point.

You do realize there are millions of votes yet to be counted?

Even your pea-brain should understand that in NJ/NY/CT alone, 1.5 million fewer votes were cast this year, than in 2008 - mostly Democratic votes not cast because of Sandy.

Fucking Racist Idiot.

The idea is to win states and get electoral votes, not run up the popular vote. Clearly Romney came closer than McCain did, but the total vote count tells us nothing.

Baldy wrote:

D1B wrote:

You see, Baldy, people love us and we have street cred. You lack both.

When we use it, it's appropriate satire. When you drop, it's vitriol from a hateful conk who thinks poor people and blacks are the root of all America's problems.

Street cred in pasty white bread Wisconsin.

That's the problem, D. You and the people who think like you are great at pointing fingers and putting labels on everyone and everything...the champions of hyphenated Americanism. The root of America's problems aren't blacks or illegals, the poor, etc. but it is the people who share the same world view as you. You will never ever understand, but there is a clear difference.

Pasty white? Beloit, South Beloit, Milwaukee, Chicago, Rockford and Madison - all less than a couple hours away at most.

People like me don't start wars, fuck off half the country, build walls, make fun of and villify people who need welfare, etc...

BlueHen86 wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

Lame Rushannity talking point.

You do realize there are millions of votes yet to be counted?

Even your pea-brain should understand that in NJ/NY/CT alone, 1.5 million fewer votes were cast this year, than in 2008 - mostly Democratic votes not cast because of Sandy.

Fucking Racist Idiot.

The idea is to win states and get electoral votes, not run up the popular vote. Clearly Romney came closer than McCain did, but the total vote count tells us nothing.

Yup - in 2008, it was apparent much earlier that Obama would win, so he set out to work on states not normally Dem (Ind and NC) and to help out in local races - so a lot of money went to NY/CA as well. This year, it was much closer, so those GOTV efforts in Blue States were curtailed.

D1B wrote:People like me don't start wars, fuck off half the country, build walls, make fun of and villify people who need welfare, etc...

The hell you don't.

89Hen wrote:

D1B wrote:People like me don't start wars, fuck off half the country, build walls, make fun of and villify people who need welfare, etc...

The hell you don't.