Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

King Konk, loudest and baddest of all conks just ate shit, big time. Keep him in your thoughts.

D1B wrote:King Konk, loudest and baddest of all conks just ate shit, big time. Keep him in your thoughts.

He who laughs last, laughs best.

Baldy wrote:

D1B wrote:King Konk, loudest and baddest of all conks just ate ****, big time. Keep him in your thoughts.

He who laughs last, laughs best.

We're not laughing with you......

Baldy wrote:

D1B wrote:King Konk, loudest and baddest of all conks just ate shit, big time. Keep him in your thoughts.

He who laughs last, laughs best.

God love you, Baldy. You're a good sport and I hope you find small comfort in the fact that I did not vote for Obama or Jill Stein. IMO, if you did not vote for Gary Johnson, you wasted your vote.

D1B wrote:

Baldy wrote:


He who laughs last, laughs best.

God love you, Baldy. You're a good sport and I hope you find small comfort in the fact that I did not vote for Obama or Jill Stein. IMO, if you did not vote for Gary Johnson, you wasted your vote.

God even loves hate-filled bigots, Baldy. That should give you comfort in your dark hour.

houndawg wrote:
We're not laughing with you......

Don't expect you to, dawg. Your sense of humor is on par with a hemorrhoid.

Baldy wrote:

houndawg wrote:
We're not laughing with you......

Don't expect you to, dawg. Your sense of humor is on par with a hemorrhoid.

Nobody likes a sore loser, Baldy, even if you're consistent about it.

houndawg wrote:

D1B wrote:
God love you, Baldy. You're a good sport and I hope you find small comfort in the fact that I did not vote for Obama or Jill Stein. IMO, if you did not vote for Gary Johnson, you wasted your vote.

God even loves hate-filled bigots, Baldy. That should give you comfort in your dark hour.

From what I've been told, God is supposed to love everyone. I just doubt he has met you yet.

houndawg wrote:

Baldy wrote:
Don't expect you to, dawg. Your sense of humor is on par with a hemorrhoid.

Nobody likes a loser, Baldy...

Guess that's why nobody likes you.

A lot of classy winners on the left I see

D1B wrote:

Baldy wrote:


He who laughs last, laughs best.

God love you, Baldy. You're a good sport and I hope you find small comfort in the fact that I did not vote for Obama or Jill Stein. IMO, if you did not vote for Gary Johnson, you wasted your vote.

I concur.

Nobody will remember Gary Johnson's name in four years and he has left no impact on this or future elections.

89Hen wrote:Nobody will remember Gary Johnson's name in four years and he has left no impact on this or future elections.

Neither has Romney (unless you count Obamacare). At least Gary Johnson offered a different vision. Why do Republicans despise conservatives?

ASUMountaineer wrote:

89Hen wrote:Nobody will remember Gary Johnson's name in four years and he has left no impact on this or future elections.

Neither has Romney (unless you count Obamacare). At least Gary Johnson offered a different vision. Why do Republicans despise conservatives?

That's a pretty big leap there. All I'm saying is a vote for Gary Johnson was a FARRRRR bigger waste than a vote for either O or Rom.

89Hen wrote:

ASUMountaineer wrote:
Neither has Romney (unless you count Obamacare). At least Gary Johnson offered a different vision. Why do Republicans despise conservatives?

That's a pretty big leap there. All I'm saying is a vote for Gary Johnson was a FARRRRR bigger waste than a vote for either O or Rom.

Not a leap, what did Romney's candidacy impact? He lost, Republicans lost more seats in the Senate, and he got less votes than McCain.

All I'm saying is that the end result is the same--Romney lost. Also, a vote for who you truly support is not a wasted vote. Voting for someone that you disagree with on a myriad of issues just because he's not the other guy is a wasted vote. I am proud I did not vote for Romney or Obama, neither deserved my vote.

Please though, answer my question. Why do Republicans despise conservatives?

89Hen wrote:

ASUMountaineer wrote:
Neither has Romney (unless you count Obamacare). At least Gary Johnson offered a different vision. Why do Republicans despise conservatives?

That's a pretty big leap there. All I'm saying is a vote for Gary Johnson was a FARRRRR bigger waste than a vote for either O or Rom.

With Johnson getting less than 1% of the vote, at least that was not enough to affect the winner of the election.

BTW, who the hell said he would get 5% (1 in 20)?

ASUMountaineer wrote:Please though, answer my question. Why do Republicans despise conservatives?

That's what I was saying was the big leap. Johnson was NOT a republican candidate, nor a viable winner. Why do you think they didn't vote for him?

With Johnson getting less than 1% of the vote, at least that was not enough to affect the winner of the election.

BTW, who the hell said he would get 5% (1 in 20)?

It's a product of no one knowing about him. If Ron Paul was the candidate, I seriously think he could have gotten close to the 5%.

ASUMountaineer wrote:

89Hen wrote: That's a pretty big leap there. All I'm saying is a vote for Gary Johnson was a FARRRRR bigger waste than a vote for either O or Rom.

Not a leap, what did Romney's candidacy impact? He lost, Republicans lost more seats in the Senate, and he got less votes than McCain.

All I'm saying is that the end result is the same--Romney lost. Also, a vote for who you truly support is not a wasted vote. Voting for someone that you disagree with on a myriad of issues just because he's not the other guy is a wasted vote. I am proud I did not vote for Romney or Obama, neither deserved my vote.

Please though, answer my question. Why do Republicans despise conservatives?

I'm not sure what you mean by the question, so I will let 89 answer that.

Meh. I'm thinking a vote for a guy that has a chance to beat the guy who you dislike the most is better than voting for the guy you like the most when you know he has no chance to win. And even if he did win, with no support in Congress, what could he get done anyway? It would be 4 years that looks like the last 2 and a half of Obamas first term.

Seahawks08 wrote:

With Johnson getting less than 1% of the vote, at least that was not enough to affect the winner of the election.

BTW, who the hell said he would get 5% (1 in 20)?

It's a product of no one knowing about him. If Ron Paul was the candidate, I seriously think he could have gotten close to the 5%.

You forgot to say, "That was me ".


OK. On a serious note. I thought it was pretty clear that nobody knew who he was. I didn't need to see the final tally to realize that. I thought you factored that in and still thought he would get 5%.

89Hen wrote:

ASUMountaineer wrote:Please though, answer my question. Why do Republicans despise conservatives?

That's what I was saying was the big leap. Johnson was NOT a republican candidate, nor a viable winner. Why do you think they didn't vote for him?

Couple of points. I didn't say Johnson WAS (capitalizing words is necessary?) a Republican, but I did call him a conservative. I also implied that he is what Republicans used to be.

The reason Republicans didn't vote for him is because clearly the Republican Party is dishonest when it says it supports personal freedom, smaller government, and fiscal responsibility.

Gary Johnson actually does support those things, unlike Romney and the GOP. The Republican Party is not a party of conservatives, though they claim to be. So, again, why do Republicans despise conservatives? Perhaps I should say, why do Republicans despise conservatism? Or is creating an unfunded Rx drug benefit plan now considered fiscally responsible?

ASUMountaineer wrote:The reason Republicans didn't vote for him is because clearly the Republican Party is dishonest when it says it supports personal freedom, smaller government, and fiscal responsibility.

You can post it a dozen more times, but it won't make it any more true. Republicans didn't vote for Gary Johnson because HE DID NOT HAVE AN 'R' NEXT TO HIS NAME and he was NOT a viable candidate during yesterday's election.

CAA Flagship wrote:

ASUMountaineer wrote:
Not a leap, what did Romney's candidacy impact? He lost, Republicans lost more seats in the Senate, and he got less votes than McCain.

All I'm saying is that the end result is the same--Romney lost. Also, a vote for who you truly support is not a wasted vote. Voting for someone that you disagree with on a myriad of issues just because he's not the other guy is a wasted vote. I am proud I did not vote for Romney or Obama, neither deserved my vote.

Please though, answer my question. Why do Republicans despise conservatives?

I'm not sure what you mean by the question, so I will let 89 answer that.

Meh. I'm thinking a vote for a guy that has a chance to beat the guy who you dislike the most is better than voting for the guy you like the most when you know he has no chance to win. And even if he did win, with no support in Congress, what could he get done anyway? It would be 4 years that looks like the last 2 and a half of Obamas first term.

Do you honestly think it would have looked different had Mitt "my views are progressive (when running in MA)" Romney been elected?

My vote was not wasted because it reflected my desire. I did not want Romney or Obama to be President in January. How is that wasting my vote?

What I find most shocking is that people actually believe that Romney would usher in change.

89Hen wrote:

ASUMountaineer wrote:The reason Republicans didn't vote for him is because clearly the Republican Party is dishonest when it says it supports personal freedom, smaller government, and fiscal responsibility.

You can post it a dozen more times, but it won't make it any more true. Republicans didn't vote for Gary Johnson because HE DID NOT HAVE AN 'R' NEXT TO HIS NAME and he was NOT a viable candidate during yesterday's election.

What is the deal with the all-caps, are you 12?

You can avoid the question all you want, doesn't make you correct.

What about the GOP since 2000 shows it supports conservatism? The GOP has clearly lost its way, and it's because it turned its back on conservatism. This concept is supported given that Republicans would rather support a self-proclaimed and proven "progressive" than a proven conservative. Pretty simple concept.

BTW, I never asked why Republicans didn't vote for Johnson last night. I asked why they despise conservatism.